Quote:
reginos said:
The GT-R is the biggest bluff in automotive history.
The triumph of publicity over substance.
I am glad people start coming to terms with the realities and recognising the cracks in the armour of this mighty car!
Quote:
Seraphim said:Quote:
reginos said:
The GT-R is the biggest bluff in automotive history.
The triumph of publicity over substance.
I am glad people start coming to terms with the realities and recognising the cracks in the armour of this mighty car!
Lol...triumph of publicity over substance?? Have you been hiding in a cave this last year? Please explain how the GTR lacks 'substance'
Quote:
Seraphim said:Quote:
reginos said:
The GT-R is the biggest bluff in automotive history.
The triumph of publicity over substance.
I am glad people start coming to terms with the realities and recognising the cracks in the armour of this mighty car!
Lol...triumph of publicity over substance?? Have you been hiding in a cave this last year? Please explain how the GTR lacks 'substance'
Sep 17, 2008 4:40:05 PM
Quote:
Crash said:
Superior performance is nothing without durability.
Quote:
WAY said:
Grant, it isn't the fluid change I am worried about. I change my oil every track day anyway. But did you know that you have to strip down the engine after a certain mileage of track use?
Sep 17, 2008 6:13:25 PM
Sep 17, 2008 6:48:26 PM
Sep 17, 2008 7:59:57 PM
Quote:
Porsche-Jeck said:Quote:
Crash said:
Superior performance is nothing without durability.
Very true In my book durability is part of the performance (though not that easy to express in numbers like 0-100 etc. ). To finish first....
Inspite of all the hype about the GT-R's laptimes I never would consider this car as a track car (too big, too heavy).
To me it appears more as an Autobahn stormer.
Sep 18, 2008 8:55:45 AM
Quote:
SadoTorque said:
Wow, the attacks between the Nissan and traditional sports car makers are getting more heated than the presidential race. If I ever see Sarah Palin in a GTR, the car forums are going to explode. Damn you Nissan for forcing Porsche to make better cars in the future. Umm... I mean thank you.
Quote:
Nidge said:
If more proof of the Nissan capabilities were needed, please see video,
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Nissan-GTR-R35-on-08-Quit_184810.htm
Quote:
Nidge said:
If more proof of the Nissan capabilities were needed, please see video,
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Nissan-GTR-R35-on-08-Quit_184810.htm
Quote:
Nidge said:I have also driven the GTR around Silverstone. The GTR is just not a cruising car. It handles in a way that defy belief.
Quote:
Heist said:
The GT-R was on (heavy) run-flat STREET TIRES - the GT-2 was on Racing Compound tires (probably street legal cut slicks).
Done! That's all I needed to see. Anyone who's done a trackday or several knows how much of a difference R compound tires can make. It can shave seconds off a lap time.
Quote:
Nidge said:
Grant, Here is my take for what it is worth. If the purist believe a car can be engaging only if its man and machine with no electronic support, then the Nissan fails. If however one can appreciate the mechanical and electronic engineering advancements, then the GTR stands on its own. I found the car completely engaging. The speed one can carry into a corner is unbelievable. Yes it flattered my driving (mind you relatively the professional driving instructors said likewise)but to say that i was uninvolved is total nonsense. The GTR is amazingly so nimble for such a large and heavy car. The only hint of understeer arrives at speed through longer bends.The gearbox is to die for and the twin turbos do their thing without lag. All i would say is if you have the chance to drive a GTR take it. It is a very credible product.
Quote:
Nidge said:
Grant, Here is my take for what it is worth. If the purist believe a car can be engaging only if its man and machine with no electronic support, then the Nissan fails. If however one can appreciate the mechanical and electronic engineering advancements, then the GTR stands on its own. I found the car completely engaging. The speed one can carry into a corner is unbelievable. Yes it flattered my driving (mind you relatively the professional driving instructors said likewise)but to say that i was uninvolved is total nonsense. The GTR is amazingly so nimble for such a large and heavy car. The only hint of understeer arrives at speed through longer bends.The gearbox is to die for and the twin turbos do their thing without lag. All i would say is if you have the chance to drive a GTR take it. It is a very credible product.
Quote:
reginos said:Quote:
Nidge said:
Grant, Here is my take for what it is worth. If the purist believe a car can be engaging only if its man and machine with no electronic support, then the Nissan fails. If however one can appreciate the mechanical and electronic engineering advancements, then the GTR stands on its own. I found the car completely engaging. The speed one can carry into a corner is unbelievable. Yes it flattered my driving (mind you relatively the professional driving instructors said likewise)but to say that i was uninvolved is total nonsense. The GTR is amazingly so nimble for such a large and heavy car. The only hint of understeer arrives at speed through longer bends.The gearbox is to die for and the twin turbos do their thing without lag. All i would say is if you have the chance to drive a GTR take it. It is a very credible product.
Nidge, the bottom line! Have ordered a GT-R or plan to acquire one in the forseeable future?