Quote:
AUM said:
This is what the 997 Turbo needed and does not have.
''The Nissan AWD system wasn't developed from the 959. It was developed from scratch from the results of super-computer simulations and other mathematical analysis. The system is far more comprehensive than that developed for the 959 or 964 C4. Basically Nissan determined the ideal front/rear torque split under all road condtions and vehicle orientations, developed an AWD transaxle to implement the theory (which is very ingenious in how it works), and developed complex sensors and computer programs to help apply the theory. No Porsche car does this.
BTW, the system is called ATTESA E-TS: Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All Electronic Torque Split. It actually can differentiate between entering a corner and exiting one.''
From 6speedonline
Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Costumer cars in USA are more powerfull then 480hp(crank). GT-R is producing at least 520hp(crank), maybe even 530-540hp... All dynos so far confirmed that figures.
Question is why is Nissan lying about true hp?
MY fellow lawyer, I am afraid you are being myopic. Your digging around in the dirt to justify your bias for a German car. Get out of the hole you are digging look at the entire forest, and acknowledge what you know in your heart is true, NISSAN HAS OUT ENGINEERED THE FORMER ENGINEERING LEADER PORSCHE
Just appreciate the wonderful achievement as have all the car magazines that have reviewed the GT-R. It is light years ahead the the base 911 models and certain substantially ahead of the TT, GT3 and GT3RS. I also believe it is ahead of my 430 but my saving grace is Ferrari is not only about performance as Porsche MUST be.
If there is a stake in the heart of Porsche by the GT-R it is this; Porsche have always been about performance/value and that is why you buy it. Styling, resale value and originality are not its strong suit. No comes a car that beats it so bad that Porsche now looks like it has old prune which cannot find a toilet fast enough to relieve itself.
Deal with it.
Final point. To my knowledge, no one has independently confirmed that the GT-R is running at a higher hp level. There is a deference between hope and fact. As a lawyer you must deal with facts.
Quote:
MKSGR said:
It is of highest importance to highlight (as Kreso did in his recent post) that there have been no proper tests of the GTR in the German press. Also, it is important to note that the GTR will not be sold to German customers before mid 2009. At the same time Nissan is already taking deposits from potential buyers...
My conclusion: The GTR is (most likely) a big cheat
Apr 13, 2008 9:55:39 AM
Quote:
nberry said:
NISSAN HAS OUT ENGINEERED THE FORMER ENGINEERING LEADER PORSCHE
Apr 13, 2008 10:02:35 AM
Quote:
Moogle said:
Well, various reliable periodicals have tested both GT-R and Turbo... GT-R wins by a small but sizable margin. It really looks like Porsche has been beat.
Quote:
Moogle said:
Well, various reliable periodicals have tested both GT-R and Turbo... GT-R wins by a small but sizable margin. It really looks like Porsche has been beat.
Styling / interior is another story... but I wonder why people refuse to accept that the GT-R is faster and technologically more advanced?
Apr 13, 2008 10:19:24 AM
Quote:
Crash said:
''The Nissan AWD system wasn't developed from the 959. It was developed from scratch from the results of super-computer simulations and other mathematical analysis. The system is far more comprehensive than that developed for the 959 or 964 C4. Basically Nissan determined the ideal front/rear torque split under all road condtions and vehicle orientations, developed an AWD transaxle to implement the theory (which is very ingenious in how it works), and developed complex sensors and computer programs to help apply the theory. No Porsche car does this.
BTW, the system is called ATTESA E-TS: Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All Electronic Torque Split. It actually can differentiate between entering a corner and exiting one.''
From 6speedonline
Quote:
Crash said:
Because on the Autobahn, it isn't faster and in real-world twisties, the difference will probably be unnoticable. As for track work, one would have to be pretty insane to track a 2-tonne car.
Apr 13, 2008 10:43:05 AM
Quote:
eclou said:Quote:
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
17-1, 6 chome, Chuou-ku, Ginza
Tokyo Japan
www.nissan.co.jp
Dear Valued Nissan GT-R customers,
Thank you very much for purchasing Nissan GT-R. We deeply apologize for the late delivery of the Nissan GT-R.
The reason of the delay is due to the decrease in production of the Nissan GT-R model caused by the shortage of the special crutch for the transmission manufactured by the American maker.
Nissan GT-R is featured in the magazine and Internet, and getting excellent reputation in the market. In order to produce remarkably smooth and fast pick-up high speed as well as the powerful resistance in driving, the special crutch is required with the guaranteed high level of precision and function, which are far different from those for standard continental cars. Unfortunately, the delivery shortage of 50 ~ 200 vehicles / month is caused by the limited capacity of the current manufacturer's production started since last year.
Maintaining the standard of quality of function and trust to all the customers is the Nissan GT-R's the first priority. We guarantee the quality and precision in every production process with strict inspection. This is also the reason for the delay in delivery. There is absolutely no other factor of defect.
In addition, the manufacturer is in the progress of expanding its production plant urgently. It is planned to start production in March or April. Once the new plant is opened, the production will be on schedule.
We, again, would like to apologize for the inconvenience caused by the late delivery of the Nissan GT-R. We seek the customer's understanding about the situation.
Thank you for continues support to Nissan GT-R at the moment and in the future.
Sincerely yours,
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
2nd Project Group
Chief Vehicle Engineer and
Chief Product Specialist
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
Moogle said:
Well, various reliable periodicals have tested both GT-R and Turbo... GT-R wins by a small but sizable margin. It really looks like Porsche has been beat.
Styling / interior is another story... but I wonder why people refuse to accept that the GT-R is faster and technologically more advanced?
Because on the Autobahn, it isn't faster and in real-world twisties, the difference will probably be unnoticable. As for track work, one would have to be pretty insane to track a 2-tonne car.
Quote:
WAY said:
Having said all that, some information has come to light from that Motor article. It is claimed by the guy who personally imported the car that in Japan, the GT-R actually requires a service after each time you track it. And it cost $1000 each time! And after 100,000km, it requires an engine strip down for the recoating of some plasma. This is one expensive car to keep, which is one thing that puts me off it...
Quote:
WAY said:
Having said all that, some information has come to light from that Motor article. It is claimed by the guy who personally imported the car that in Japan, the GT-R actually requires a service after each time you track it. And it cost $1000 each time! And after 100,000km, it requires an engine strip down for the recoating of some plasma. This is one expensive car to keep, which is one thing that puts me off it...
Apr 13, 2008 12:38:21 PM
Quote:
WAY said:
No, the 100,000km service doesn't relate to track time. That is for all cars reaching that milestone. And in terms of service after each track day, I used to do that on my Porsches too, but they were simple services like oil change, brake fluid, back to road pads etc. Usually cost me $200-300 done by Porsche motorsport division. But $1000 after each track day? That is a bit too rich for me. I don't race my cars, just do the social track days.
Apr 13, 2008 12:55:05 PM
Quote:
Crash said:Yep. That's the only thing I really love about the GT-R. Its AWD system is the best there is.
Apr 13, 2008 1:22:43 PM
Quote:
eclou said:
No one wants to comment on the Autoweek article stating the GTR is less satisfying to drive than the IS-F? That the GTR was felt to make the driver only a secondary component of the driving experience?
Quote:
Grant said:Quote:
Crash said:Yep. That's the only thing I really love about the GT-R. Its AWD system is the best there is.
The Mitsubishi EVO X has a similarly excellent system which they call Super All Wheel Control (which includes about 10 different acronyms). It makes sure the car never understeers (or oversteers) in a corner by vectoring torque to each of the 4 wheels as necessary. No understeer is very difficult to achieve in a front-engined AWD car. It comes standard with LSD on both front and rear axles (as well as electronic center diff) too.
It is also much more advanced than Porsche's PTM...
Apr 13, 2008 1:28:22 PM
Quote:
Porsche-Jeck said:Quote:
eclou said:
No one wants to comment on the Autoweek article stating the GTR is less satisfying to drive than the IS-F? That the GTR was felt to make the driver only a secondary component of the driving experience?
Sounds like exactly the same verdict topgear (?) stated in a GT-R/R8 comparo. I'm with Carlos (see his earlier post in this thread): the driving experience/fun is what counts for the majority of (non-poser) buyers. And that's hard/impossible to judge from the numbers on paper.