Quote:
arakis said:
hi I was wondering is the function, time limited like u can use it once every 5 min, like for overtacking on a highway? Actualy anyone who knows how it works and what are the limitations is welcome.
Quote:
arakis said:
hi I was wondering is the function, time limited like u can use it once every 5 min, like for overtacking on a highway? Actualy anyone who knows how it works and what are the limitations is welcome.
1 févr. 2006 12:29:57
Quote:
arakis said:
stupid me, sorry. yea probably the gt2 version will have 700Nm+ all the time
Quote:
TB993tt said:
IF I get one of these I would forego this feature and wait for the tuners to crack the ECU - 680NM will be a joke compared to what is waiting in there.
1 févr. 2006 18:44:45
Quote:
Fanch said:Quote:
arakis said:
yeah for inexpirienced drvers, for those that know what they are doing more power is always a good thing.
Not that I would qualify myself as an experienced driver, but given the choice, I'd rather have less weight than more power.
1 févr. 2006 18:59:42
2 févr. 2006 01:03:42
Quote:
RC said:Quote:
arakis said:
stupid me, sorry. yea probably the gt2 version will have 700Nm+ all the time
Have you ever driven a 996 GT2 on the track? Trust me, you have to be an excellent driver to be able to keep up with those GT3 MkII because the high torque and turbo boost actually create a lot of problems for unexperienced drivers.
So unless somebody is Walter Röhrl, I suggest sticking with GT2 stock power or better...get a tuned 911 Turbo and you'll blow away most of the cars around the track even with less developped driver skills.
Quote:
TB993tt said:
Now we have what appear to be authorised power/torque numbers for the 997tt of 480PS/620NM one can speculate further on the overboost function. According to the reports it will give 680NM for "short bursts".
For a motor which in 996tt form could give over 700NM reliably with just an exhaust and ECU modification this new engine with its further advancements, (especially the variable vane turbos which should allow much greater efficiency and colder intake air which is THE most important feature, keeping the engine away from its knock limits)would easily be able to run 680NM ALL the time, no problem - I'm afraid this feature is Porsche giving its customers a spanking $$$$$$
IF I get one of these I would forego this feature and wait for the tuners to crack the ECU - 680NM will be a joke compared to what is waiting in there.
Quote:
Turbo Al said:Quote:
[
TB993tt,
I have sympathy for what you are arguing, after all, the stock 996TTS peak torque is 457lb-ft or 620Nm-the same as rumoured on the 997baseTT (sans overboost). HOWEVER, and this is where RC's point is important about power and torque across the rev-range and with varying outputs graded to throttle pressure, what we call driveability , peak power and torque numbers alone don't do justice to the car's performance: With the VTG's spooling quickly, 620Nm (with 680 with OB) at low rev's, can produce superior performance in a 997TT versus a 996TT with KKK16 or 24 turbo's, due to BOTH decreased T-lag and OB. AND with the 997TT's improved chassis (not to mention possible lighter weight yielding higher power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios at a given rpm), the car's available power will more efficiently translate to higher speeds in the turns. So peak HP and torque numbers on a 996TT don't directly correlate with peak HP and torque numbers on a 997TT. All this means that, while YES, peak power and torque numbers DO matter, this is only the "tip of the iceberg" when measuring performance, if you will pardon the expression, all the more reason to WAIT until the official specs. AND independent reviews/testdrives (likely to be reported first HERE on rennteam) come in. And this recommendation comes from a 996TTS owner on my dealer's waiting list for a 997TT who advocates modding the 996TT-HINT: Look below at my signature summarizing the 911Turbo I own.
I also think the 997TT will be easily modded with ECU upgrade and minor mechanical mods to handle the added thermal stress, but I too will prefer the Porsche powerkit (or the "S") over an aftermarket tuning-not just for warranty protection, but also because the factory upgrade will be based on extensive testing for reliability through trial and error, two reasons the aftermarket for 997TT upgrades will be riskier, especially in the first couple years after launch.
BTW, I am betting the overboost feature (in the Sports Chrono Turbo package) will be automatically actuated in the Bosch-Motronic program-based on right foot-controlled throttle manipulation, rather than fired from a switch on the dash or steering wheel, as I suspect some people think-I could be wrong, but I think a more sophisticated system would be hooked up to the throttle-simply keep the Sports Chrono Turbo mode in the "On" postiiton, floor it and feel the whiplash!
I agree with everything you say here. My one reservation is with Porsche making the overboost feature an $$$ option - I guess one can see why as the "poseurs" can save their money.
I agree entirely about the "peak power" argument, these variable turbos are going to be amazing.
What I am going to find fascinating over the next couple of years in watching the tuners try and "crack" the electronics and unleash another dimension with tuned VVTs. There will only be a few who manage it - but Porsche always leave so much on the table, witness a stock 996tt versus a "chipped" one +100NM - A properly tuned 997tt is going to be something else.
Quote:
TB993tt said:Quote:
Turbo Al said:Quote:
[
TB993tt,
I have sympathy for what you are arguing, after all, the stock 996TTS peak torque is 457lb-ft or 620Nm-the same as rumoured on the 997baseTT (sans overboost). HOWEVER, and this is where RC's point is important about power and torque across the rev-range and with varying outputs graded to throttle pressure, what we call driveability , peak power and torque numbers alone don't do justice to the car's performance: With the VTG's spooling quickly, 620Nm (with 680 with OB) at low rev's, can produce superior performance in a 997TT versus a 996TT with KKK16 or 24 turbo's, due to BOTH decreased T-lag and OB. AND with the 997TT's improved chassis (not to mention possible lighter weight yielding higher power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios at a given rpm), the car's available power will more efficiently translate to higher speeds in the turns. So peak HP and torque numbers on a 996TT don't directly correlate with peak HP and torque numbers on a 997TT. All this means that, while YES, peak power and torque numbers DO matter, this is only the "tip of the iceberg" when measuring performance, if you will pardon the expression, all the more reason to WAIT until the official specs. AND independent reviews/testdrives (likely to be reported first HERE on rennteam) come in. And this recommendation comes from a 996TTS owner on my dealer's waiting list for a 997TT who advocates modding the 996TT-HINT: Look below at my signature summarizing the 911Turbo I own.
I also think the 997TT will be easily modded with ECU upgrade and minor mechanical mods to handle the added thermal stress, but I too will prefer the Porsche powerkit (or the "S") over an aftermarket tuning-not just for warranty protection, but also because the factory upgrade will be based on extensive testing for reliability through trial and error, two reasons the aftermarket for 997TT upgrades will be riskier, especially in the first couple years after launch.
BTW, I am betting the overboost feature (in the Sports Chrono Turbo package) will be automatically actuated in the Bosch-Motronic program-based on right foot-controlled throttle manipulation, rather than fired from a switch on the dash or steering wheel, as I suspect some people think-I could be wrong, but I think a more sophisticated system would be hooked up to the throttle-simply keep the Sports Chrono Turbo mode in the "On" postiiton, floor it and feel the whiplash!
I agree with everything you say here. My one reservation is with Porsche making the overboost feature an $$$ option - I guess one can see why as the "poseurs" can save their money.
I agree entirely about the "peak power" argument, these variable turbos are going to be amazing.
What I am going to find fascinating over the next couple of years in watching the tuners try and "crack" the electronics and unleash another dimension with tuned VVTs. There will only be a few who manage it - but Porsche always leave so much on the table, witness a stock 996tt versus a "chipped" one +100NM - A properly tuned 997tt is going to be something else.
Yes,
Are you on a dealer list for a 997TT like the rest of us?
Quote:
TB993tt said:
Hi Al
Yes I'm on the list, but probably won't be taking it. I like my Porsches raw and I feel the turbo has moved in a different direction - the 997GT2 however remains an interesting possible proposition.
Quote:
RC said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
The whole idea of a turbocharged 6 is so yesterday.
They need a motor rethink. I think its time for a 5 liter flat 8.
The flat 6 is good for up to 800 HP and more. So where's the problem???
Quote:
Fanch said:Quote:
RC said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
The whole idea of a turbocharged 6 is so yesterday.
They need a motor rethink. I think its time for a 5 liter flat 8.
The flat 6 is good for up to 800 HP and more. So where's the problem???
People don't seem to realise there will NEVER be a flat 8 rear engined Porsche. It's been said over and over again and by multiple sources (Web, press and mostly Wolfgang Durheimer).
It's dynamically not possible anyway.
Quote:
Grant said:
Fanch - I realize that it might be more of challenge with respect to packaging and weight limitations, but why is it impossible? I thought with new materials and careful design that a Flat-8 could be built without increasing weight or size very much...
Do you think a mid-engined Flat-8 could return to the Porsche lineup (it's been a long time)?
Quote:
RC said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
The whole idea of a turbocharged 6 is so yesterday.
They need a motor rethink. I think its time for a 5 liter flat 8.
The flat 6 is good for up to 800 HP and more. So where's the problem???