Crown

Board: Porsche - 911 - 997 Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    To note:

    Le Mans Peugeot 908 - 6-speed tranny.

    Le Mans Audi R10 - 5-speed tranny.

    The 997's 6-gears or PDK's 6 + overdrive are plenty, don't you think?

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Nothing exists in a vacuum

    More gears is a just substitute for more torque. If you have plenty of torque you don't need lots of gears. If your torque curve looks like a mountain, then you need a shedload of gears to compensate.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    ^ Co-sign.
    Gears are only there to keep the engine either in the
    (1) In the sweet spot of the torque range.
    (2) In the fuel efficient, cruising range.

    F1 cars make pissloads of power but laughable torque - such is the reason they have 7 gears. I mean the cars weigh less than 1500lbs, the engines make 900hp+, and rev to the stratosphere but if you try to start out in 2nd gear you'll stall everytime!

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Heist, off topic, but last night they showed HEAT here on TV and immediately I thought of your posts.

    As for six speeds being enough, there are now gearboxes with eight gears!

    The new 997 makes top speed in sixth gear, seventh is for economy and relaxed cruising. I must say I kind of like that idea. In the regular 911 and with PDK, it makes sense. But in a GT3, I am very happy with having exactly six gears.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Quote:
    MarekN said:
    The new 997 makes top speed in sixth gear, seventh is for economy and relaxed cruising. I must say I kind of like that idea. In the regular 911 and with PDK, it makes sense. But in a GT3, I am very happy with having exactly six gears.



    You come around to my point. 6 gears are fine in a 997, and I agree that a 7th gear overdrive is good for long range cruising, which few 911s do, but I do.

    Should PDK have 7 close-spaced cogs with top speed in 7th, I admit there might be a marginal acceleration advantage, but I think it's not worth the trouble.

    To the replier who stated there are now 8-gear trannys, I say, more is not always better.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Retarded drawings to the rescue

    Ok so first off hp is what decides how fast you accelerate. The short explanation is that, yes torque is a (twisting) force and torque matters, but it's torque actually at the wheels that matters and if you make torque at a higher rpm, then you can use a gear to get more torque at your wheels (think big lever with mechanical advantage). Guess what magical unit of measurement includes both torque and what rpm you make the torque... HP (hp = torque X rpm X a constant of proportionality). If this doesn't make sense learn more at your local internet.

    So now that we know that keeping the highest hp is what really matters lets look at some dyno plots.

    The first is a car that doesn't need a lot of gears. This is because the torque drops off quickly because this motor sucks and runs out of breath at high rpm. This creates a relatively flat HP curve because as torque goes down, rpm goes up and hp remains relatively the same. (BTW if you made 200 foot pounds of torque at 3000 rpm and 110 foot pounds of torque at 6000 rpm and at 30mph in gear A you're at 3000 rpm and in gear B you're at 6000 rpm, you accelerate faster at 6000 rpm with only 110 foot pounds of torque because gear B has a different mechanical advantage so that the torque at the wheels is greater since 110 is greater than half of 200 and 3000 is half of 6000). The point is with hp the same at all these rpms then you have an artificially wide powerband and you only need 5 gears.

    Look at plot two, it's beautiful, like a GT3. It has a nice flat TORQUE curve. This is because for the particular engine size they made it work well at high rpms and low rpms. Again we didn't make it flat by cutting off the low end, we added high end with a motor that can breath. Only way to increase low end (on this optimized car) is add displacement. But we see now in this proper motor that we make so much more hp now at high rpm that we should take advantage of that and add gears. So really needing more gears is taking advantage of a car that can breath. It's not that these motors lack low end, it's that "torque motors" just don't have the high end they could potentially have. If you want more everywhere just build a bigger motor, that's a different discussion.

    The second graph is not a peaky motor, it's just a good one that works well at all rpm (flat torque curve). The third graph is a peaky motor.


    Finally, yes 7 gears would be nice on a 3. Many racecars and the extreme track day crowd use shorter 6 speeds that top out at 160 mph and they are faster because of it. If you had these 6 gears plus a 7th that topped out at 200mph for top speed (all 1-7 properly spaced without gaps), this would rock and be the best of both worlds.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    It seems to me that if manufacturers are requiring 7 & 8 speed greaboxes that it may be more fruitful to investigate the "automatic gearbox" that Jim Hall pioneered with the Chaparral. The advancements in computer control and hydraulics make such a device even more feasible. Manufacturers have forgotten the KISS principle.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    1 word, marketing. Otherwise we'd all be driving CVTs. But who wants a car that sounds like a sewing machine?

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Quote:
    connoisseur said:
    It seems to me that if manufacturers are requiring 7 & 8 speed greaboxes that it may be more fruitful to investigate the "automatic gearbox" that Jim Hall pioneered with the Chaparral. The advancements in computer control and hydraulics make such a device even more feasible. Manufacturers have forgotten the KISS principle.



    Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't Jim Hall's auto transmission just a conventional hydraulic torque converter and three-speed epicyclic transmission, but with the then innovative feature of a "lock-up" in the upper ratios?

    If that was the case, then manufacturers did indeed adopt that concept and develop it further. See the Tiptronic, for instance.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Quote:
    Moogle said:
    1 word, marketing. Otherwise we'd all be driving CVTs. But who wants a car that sounds like a sewing machine?



    Hmmmm, Singer Murano has a good ring to it as a model name.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    I would definitely order the PDK if I were ordering a new 911, as the shifting is probably incredibly fast (much faster than me engaging a clutch and shift lever). Most of us are not Formula 1 drivers, and they have the advantage of the fast shifter.

    My best guess is that Porsche waited this long to introduce the PDK for two reasons; 1) to make sure that they could patent critical parts of it; and, 2) to make sure it would work flawlessly - that is, a heck of a lot better than it does on most other cars (at least in the high end price spectrum) that offer a roughly similar option.

    Jim

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    New Honda/Acura NSX will need 8 forward gears to beat NBR time of GT-R:
    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=127306

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    One very interesting thing in both drive impressions in German mags AMS and AZ. They both claim that PDK is actually most natural in D mode(be it standard, Sport or Sport Plus). They even said that(my translation with little freedom)"..only shifting fan will use puddles since auto modes works almost perfectly!"...

    Huh?!

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    One very interesting thing in both drive impressions in German mags AMS and AZ. They both claim that PDK is actually most natural in D mode(be it standard, Sport or Sport Plus). They even said that(my translation with little freedom)"..only shifting fan will use puddles since auto modes works almost perfectly!"...

    Huh?!



    PDK, the new Tiptronic, egnineered by Porsche.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Most drivers can't handle 4 gears properly never mind 7

    More gears = more cogs = more linkages = more weight = more to go wrong = cocktail party bragging rights.

    Re: 6 speed tranny clearly enough...

    Quote:
    Jim48 said:
    I would definitely order the PDK if I were ordering a new 911, as the shifting is probably incredibly fast (much faster than me engaging a clutch and shift lever). Most of us are not Formula 1 drivers, and they have the advantage of the fast shifter.

    My best guess is that Porsche waited this long to introduce the PDK for two reasons; 1) to make sure that they could patent critical parts of it; and, 2) to make sure it would work flawlessly - that is, a heck of a lot better than it does on most other cars (at least in the high end price spectrum) that offer a roughly similar option.

    Jim



    Actually, they waited until they could redesign the engine, so they would not have the long distance with poorly supported shafts and clutches, going from the last main bearing to the first transmission bearing. Imagine the RMS problems then...

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 5/15/24 8:44 AM
    art.italy
    852464 1808
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS - 2022 3/12/24 8:28 AM
    DJM48
    291902 323
    Porsche Sticky The new Macan: the first all-electric SUV from Porsche 1/30/24 9:18 AM
    RCA
    102304 45
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Taycan 2024 Facelift 3/15/24 1:23 PM
    CGX car nut
    21193 50
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 7/27/24 8:44 PM
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    919693 1365
    Porsche GT4RS 4/21/24 11:50 AM
    mcdelaug
    443885 1454
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 2/10/24 4:43 PM
    nberry
    431465 1526
    Porsche Red Nipples 991.2 GT3 Touring on tour 5/12/24 6:23 PM
    blueflame
    306225 669
    Motor Sp. 2023 Formula One 12/19/23 5:38 AM
    WhoopsyM
    149806 685
    BMW M 2024 BMW M3 CS Official Now 12/29/23 9:04 AM
    RCA
    139220 303
    Porsche 2022 992 Safari Model 3/7/24 4:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    96968 239
    AMG Mercedes-Benz W124 500E aka Porsche typ 2758 2/23/24 10:03 PM
    blueflame
    84017 297
    Porsche 992 GT3 RS 3/3/24 7:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    74128 314
    Motor Sp. Porsche 963 5/18/24 9:44 PM
    Wonderbar
    37324 249
    Ferrari Ferrari 296 GTB (830PS, Hybrid V6) 1/21/24 4:29 PM
    GT-Boy
    31711 103
    BMW M 2022 BMW M5 CS 4/8/24 1:43 PM
    Ferdie
    29377 140
    AMG [2022] Mercedes-AMG SL 4/23/24 1:24 PM
    RCA
    24823 225
    Porsche 911 S/T 9/21/24 5:26 AM
    Pilot
    23145 59
    Porsche Macan EV 1/25/24 9:10 AM
    RCA
    21439 28
    Motor Sp. Formula 1 2024!! 6/15/24 11:25 AM
    Anderson
    20385 217
    Porsche 993 4S 3/10/24 12:54 PM
    blueflame
    16543 49
    Porsche 992FL 12/27/23 5:49 PM
    Wonderbar
    15407 16
    BMW M New device for DD 11/23/23 11:58 PM
    WhoopsyM
    10609 9
    Porsche win the lottery? what would you buy? 9/14/24 12:36 AM
    Pilot
    7446 61
    Porsche Taycan ST vs EQS580 1/5/24 1:45 AM
    mcdelaug
    6070 14
    Ferrari The SSO Awards: 2023 12/30/23 6:57 PM
    CGX car nut
    5610 6
    BMW M BMW XM 2/22/24 9:56 PM
    Enmanuel
    5489 23
    Porsche New Panamera Turbo order 3/29/24 3:25 PM
    N11KOY
    5354 7
    Porsche
    Asia
    red 997 gt3 S-Go 5104 11/20/23 9:38 AM
    Oj911
    5276 6
    McLaren McLaren 650S Spider: 5 Years as my Daily Driver 10/17/24 6:16 AM
    sour
    4936 12
    52 items found, displaying 1 to 30.