Jun 16, 2004 7:12:11 PM
- Moogle
- Rennteam Master
- Loc: Bay Area , United States
- Posts: 5019, Gallery
- Registered on: Aug 9, 2003
- Reply to: Carlos from Spain
Jun 16, 2004 7:12:11 PM
Jun 16, 2004 7:26:12 PM
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
carlos fromspain said:
torque converter ... its probably cheaper to make and maintain, at least now, so it will be more popular on lower end cars or models were money is a big factor.
Actually, a quality torque converter costs 15x to 20x as much as a DSG solution
Jun 16, 2004 7:29:27 PM
Jun 16, 2004 7:29:43 PM
Jun 16, 2004 7:40:14 PM
Quote:
carlos fromspain said:
Heaven forbid!! no matter how good it is performance wise, it will never compensate for the involvement and pleasure of a manual in a sportcar for some people, myself included. The future of sequentials, yes. The future of manuals? never
Jun 16, 2004 9:42:59 PM
Quote:
VKSF said:
Should be interesting to see if BMW only offers 7-speed SMG on new M5....w/no traditional manual available
Jun 17, 2004 6:01:29 AM
Quote:
carlos fromspain said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
carlos fromspain said:
torque converter ... its probably cheaper to make and maintain, at least now, so it will be more popular on lower end cars or models were money is a big factor.
Actually, a quality torque converter costs 15x to 20x as much as a DSG solution
Really? I din't know that! yikes I though it would be more expensive now since the technology is new and production low, etc and become cheaper close to a manual's cost in the future, but 15x to 20x thats quite a difference!
Does that mean Porsche will charge 15x to 20x less for the DSG than what they were charging for the Tip?
Jun 17, 2004 3:32:24 PM
Quote:
Moogle said:
if porsche will have 3 tranny options when the DSG comes out (considering they don't eliminate the Tip altogether)
it will probably be
1. 6 speed Traditional Manual (standard)
2. 6 speed Tiptronic S ($3000~)
3. 6 speed DSG ($4000~)
less expensive wouldnt make sense, and too much more expensive wouldnt make sense either, porsche loves to niche market look at all the 911 variants,
now, with transmissions, as well as their 911 variants, its like baskin 31 flavours... something for everyone.
Quote:
MKSGR said:
Actually, a quality torque converter costs 15x to 20x as much as a DSG solution
Quote:
fritz said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
Actually, a quality torque converter costs 15x to 20x as much as a DSG solution
MKSGR,
When you say that, what exactly are comparing?
It cannot be the prices of the respective complete transmissions, because that would also mean that a typical torque converter/epicyclic transmission would have to be more than 15 to 20 times more expensive than a typical manual gearbox, which is far from being the case.
If it were the case, then the slush-pump auto would not have been Detroit's "transmission of choice" for the last 5 to 6 decades! The famous GM/Ford/Chrysler bean counters would never have allowed it to get that way.
Quote:
MKSGR said:
The cost ratio does indeed relate to the entire gear unit. Obviously, the cost ratio does not necessarily reflect upon the prices charged to the customer
Jun 18, 2004 10:55:14 PM
Quote:
carlos fromspain said:
Well, the DSG must be really cheap now because I just read in a mag that they are now offering it in the VW Touran and Golf TDI!
Jun 18, 2004 11:21:01 PM
Quote:
Moogle said:Quote:
carlos fromspain said:
Well, the DSG must be really cheap now because I just read in a mag that they are now offering it in the VW Touran and Golf TDI!
is it standard or an option...
if an option, anyone know how much they are charging?...
(just wait and see porsche's option be essentially the same unit with minimal modifications but at 5-10 times the price)
Quote:
fritz said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
The cost ratio does indeed relate to the entire gear unit. Obviously, the cost ratio does not necessarily reflect upon the prices charged to the customer
I think the source of your information got the decimal point in the wrong place when comparing the production costs of slush pump auto trannies to manual gearboxes. And even then, a factor of 1.5 to 1 would be on the high side.