Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
More like your wishful thinking clouding your mind.
Porsche claims that the "fastback" feature of the Tip,when combined with Sport Chrono on Sport, provides for lightening quick downshifts, perfectly matched to engine speed and that it even does that and shifts down automatically when applying the brakes.
So far no news on that from independent sources.
So far its just.."Oh, the Tip is slower at changing gears."
Be a ostrich if you want to be, thats ok, but I want to see some specific mention of that claimed performance in a test.
Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
leasing does have its money factor and tax advantages, but it also kills some of the joy of feeling actual ownership.
Id rather say, yes my Enzo is bought and paid for, instead of Oh, its owned by City Bank.
Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
Trip, Dont look to me to help you improve your reading comprehension skills.. but as a gift to you....
Yes the manual TT did better buy a few sec on the 'ring, a long course with some longe straights. So for the ring its the best choice. Let the simple parrots in the press squak that different ways.
But street use is a different matter, the Tip is quicker where its used the most - 0 to 200kph. How is the Tip being quicker "less involving" or less "sporty" ???
And on a short technical course wich downshifts quicker?
If you are that enamoured with journalists as paragons of accuracy and theink they are all knowing of all details, just visit the retraction pages of the NY Times or the many law offices that specialize in libel actions against-gasp- "Journalists"!
Quote:
trip said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
Trip, Dont look to me to help you improve your reading comprehension skills.. but as a gift to you....
Yes the manual TT did better buy a few sec on the 'ring, a long course with some longe straights. So for the ring its the best choice. Let the simple parrots in the press squak that different ways.
But street use is a different matter, the Tip is quicker where its used the most - 0 to 200kph. How is the Tip being quicker "less involving" or less "sporty" ???
And on a short technical course wich downshifts quicker?
If you are that enamoured with journalists as paragons of accuracy and theink they are all knowing of all details, just visit the retraction pages of the NY Times or the many law offices that specialize in libel actions against-gasp- "Journalists"!
That was not only the most arrogant post I have read in a while, it was the most ignorant. Why would I need to improve my reading comprehension skills? You have no reason to say that. Don't look to me to improve your car knowledge. Exploiting the tiptronics slight advantage to 200kph is not going to make the car more invovling. Do you know what the word involving means? Involving has nothing to do with speed, it is how INVOLVED you are in the driving experience. If the car was completely automated and all you had to do was sit in it, it might would be quicker because human error would be completely removed yet, by the definition of the word, there would be no involvment. How can you fail to grasp this? So far you have proved to me you know very little about driving and that the only pleasure you get is from comparing statistics. You are not an enthusiast if you cannot even understand what driver involvment means! Again the tip is obviously the transmision for you. Not to say that all those buying the tip are not enthusiasts, RC is definitely passionate. But he understands what driver involvment means and you clearly don't. And no, I don't hold journalists on a pedistal, but they have actually driven the car, understand the word involvment, and have little or no bias, unlike you.Stop wasting everyone's time with your nonsense posts.
Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
But, some of them like Horst von Saurma from German Sport Auto mag are really good drivers!
Don't let that hear Nick!
Quote:
W8MM said:Quote:
zzboba said:PAG could have saved us from this dilemma with the timely introduction of the PDK.
I'm not sure I can agree.
Twin-clutch, double-gear-shaft style transmission setups have some serious heat dissipation challenges since (as I understand it) simultaneous slip of both clutches necessarily substitutes for the action of the torque converter in the Tip to arrive at acceptably smooth gear changes.
Twin clutches need to be packaged in the space ordinarily devoted to only one. They might each have to be smaller in order that both have an acceptably small combined packaging volume. Smaller, while simultaneously more powerful, seems hard to do.
The Veyron seems to have conquered this problem at a high power level, but we're talking here about a Porsche at 10 times lower cost. How many PDKs would be sold for a $40,000 option price?
What if one wants to "chip" ones new 997TT? How robust do the new double-shaft twin-clutches have to be? How much safety margin is built in for the "tuners" to use up?
I can just hear it now; "Why didn't they make the PDK able to stand adequate power? Now, I'll have to buy a (insert other transmission here) so I can get what I want in the way of even higher power level!"
The posts I especially love are the accusations that Porsche is not really an engineering company at heart, but rather a slimy, manipulative marketer of less than optimum, over-hyped hardware pandered to a bunch of image-conscious know-nothings that crowd out the needs of the truly worthy, who deserve much better.
Tell me, which company is serving the needs of car enthusiasts so much better than Porsche?
Quote:
W8MM said:Quote:
trip said:... I don't think that the manual will be a special order item because it is still available on ferraris even though 90% choose the F1 geabox.
So, once it gets to 98% F1, will the manual be special order then?
Quote:
W8MM said:Quote:
nberry said:The arguments here for manual are a last gasp by backward thinking car enthusiast who know they are on life support.
Nick, you and Trip should go to counseling together to work out your respective issues.
Quote:
trip said:
So you are trying to teach me a lesson? My exchange with JimFlat6 only reached such a heated level on my part because of the way in which he kept attacking my views without supporting his argument with anything but his opinion. What does that have to do with you?