Quote:
RC said:
But all this passion/non-passion schmonzens really gives me the passion myself and yes, I call it crap. C.R.A.P.
Maybe this example helps, btw. a very good one taken from a friend: a man meets a woman, they have fun together, man claims afterwards that woman was cold like a fish and boring (technically speaking...you understand ). Another man dates the same woman a few weeks later, they have fun and this man claims afterwards that this woman rocked and that it was incredible. The second guy is a pretty experienced guy, not to say a ladies man. Now guess who knew how to press the right buttons to ignite that passion?! If you guys didn't get my point with this comparison, I'm sorry. To each his own I guess.
Although you are correct in some of your assumptions, there has to be a standard of judgement. We cannot absolve everything into relativity.
The gestalt concept of a sports car is not a definitive strata, but it has several aspects to its ideology that are empirically accepted:
1.) To derive pleasure from the act of driving it
-this can be delivered through the sensation (feel, sound, touch) of speed
-the concept of speed can be further broken down into elements such as acceleration or cornering. Acceleration is pretty much percieved as the less pure of the two (relying on grip and power as the most important elements (any muscle car can haul arse down a line, it takes more around a track).
-The concept of cornering adds elements such as weight, RWD pleasure (the balance between oversteer, understeer and control), aerodynamics, grip etc...
-The most
hardcore purists in regards to cornering will be obsessed with things such as ABS, Power Steering and above all else
weight . Cars such as the McLaren F1, the Ferarri F40, the GT3RS, the Lotus Elise become the staples of this ideology. The truly fanatics push it further to the ariel atoms, the Radicals etc...
-Top speed can also be thrown into the equation, something of a mix between aerodynamics and weight/power ratio. Something of a hybrid...
---------
2.) To derive pleasure from the act of appreciating it (the vehicle)
-this can be delivered visually and auditorally; amongst friends and pedestrians.
-Do you find the sound of the Carerra GT spinetingling? Do you find yourself standing in your garage staring at your F430 for untold periods of time? Do you enjoy having people gawk at your Ferrari F430? These are subsidiary elements to the concept of sport driving pleasure but nevertheless
important elements .
- what does one find aesthetically pleasing? What does one find visually stimulating? These become more convoluted questions about personal taste, anyone can attest to this.
-(The very tennants of aesthetic standards is a much larger concept that is only tangentially relevant, so I wont get into it)
------------
The fundamental principles of driving pleasure are founded on the connection between the man and the machine.
To give an example, do you get pleasure at raising a child to be a functional and well-mannered human being or do you get pleasure at hiring maids, tutors and nannies to do it for yourself?
Of course, the debate between GT3 and Turbo is not as simple as the afformentioned anecdote. Both have their strengths and both have their weaknesses in the paradigm I so roughly laid out above.
Both cars can derive pleasure, however
the GT3 is more pure to form (undeniably) in terms of connection between the driver and the machine. This very element is perhaps why Excellence magazine's snipet about the GT3 was filled with speculation, about the PASM's role in changing the driver/machine paradigm on the machine.
----------
What we can draw from this is that the Turbo
is not a pure sportscar . It never has been and anyone who claims it to be or is disappointed by it not being is foolish.
It is heavy, it is less involving (4WD vs 2WD) and this particular 997 pushes the envelope with the concept of Tiptronic vs Manual (again, back to connectivity with the machine).
However, the very question of true sports driving is becoming more and more impractical for many, so
compromises are appreciated . The 997 Turbo may be the most technically jawdropping compromise for a sports car ever.
Furthermore, we can't always be so selfish to the tennants of pure pleasure via driving. Issues such as safety and responsibility are important.
For many (especially on the 997 Turbo forum) this is
exactly what they want and I emplore them to get this fantastic machine.
For others (such as AUM and, I must say, myself) it is not the end-all be all. These others may be reckless and less safe and less concerned about the creatures of comfort, but they are more connected to the concept of sports car driving.