Hmm...not trying to start something, but is it possible that the LT's time is in the trofeos? I mean, if you take the times that have been put down between the 650s coupe and spider vs the Huracan, the H is generally either even or slightly faster. The only times I've read the 650 being faster are "Officially" three time, but "Technically" two times since i can't find where the third source came from. I'm not even going to consider the N-Ring time for both, since the Huracan had an ABS problem, and I don't even know what happened to the 650s since its even slower than the 12c. On C&D's LL2015, the huracan was 1.7secs slower than the 650s (if the test was done in a similar fashion to the 2016 test, such as nearly each car had a different driver, then this is voided. But both were on trofeos presumably, since the huracan is always tracked on them), everything else is either a second or a couple of tenths.
Once you throw in the SV which probably has a bigger disadvantage due to weight, tranny, and tires, but the difference is usually a second, except for willow springs (0.4secs). Then once you swap in the 675LT, the difference flips. Then the LT is generally half a second to a full second faster than the SV, even in the hands of customers (salomondrin. However, you could argue that most of his tests are voided since we have no idea about what state the tires are in, whether the suspensions been calibrated for that specific track, or whether they have the heaviest or lightest specs). But do you think that once you get past the rawness, feel, and weight of the car, most of times come from the tires? Do you think it is overhyped because of its low weight, while the SV and lambo in general are underestimated? Because if you take C&D's SV test, the acceleration is essentially even at 300kph.
Then I decided to compare the 650s coupe and spider to the LT. On P-zeros, the 650s lapped the Sachsenring around 1:34, while the turbo s did it 1:32 on the same tire (you could argue its a shorter track, so it benefits the turbo s, unlike most other tracks where its generally a second slower). Then they put the 650s on semi-slicks and it put down a 1:33, while the 675LT put down a 1:30. Then theres willow springs where the 650s spider did a 1:25.8, and the LT a 1:24.2, But the spider had a hodgepodge set of tires, Pirelli "Assimetricos" in the rear and "Corsas" on the front. But the funniest test, is actually the Sachsenring test of the 570s and the 650s. The 570 is actually faster, than the 650 on that one track, despite the 650 being on corsas and semi-slicks. Except for the willow springs test, they're nearly even.
I would like to add in the 488 in light of the recent EVO test, but they too had different drivers, so that test is voided. This is why I'm waiting for the LT nurburgring test, so we can compare them. I would like some comments and opinions about this post and why these times are so close to each other, despite their differences. Is it down to tires or just simple good engineering and chassis? PS, noone1, please don't post this to mclife. I don't want cause a nuclear firestorm over there and then have every post of mine flagged, treated as a troll, or just get generally insulted or mobbed.