Just spent 10 minutes finding Nberry quotes.
Let's just say you wont get the "employee of the month award" from Porsche
ANTI-PORSCHE (company or owners) or promoting Ferrari
It would be my pick(it really is a fabulous car) but for its plummeting new and resale value. I just saw a NEW CGT advertised for $400,000 in Autoweek.
It reminds me of the stockmarket.
::::::::::
James, Ford depreciate just like Porsche's but not as much. However I do like your Google strategy.
::::::::::::
I suppose I could tone down my anti-Porsche rhetoric but then what would the poster's do? Defending what you buy is bonding with what you bought.
:::::::::::
The track exclusion is an insult to every Porsche owner. It forces the owner to lie.
What I cannot believe is that I have to defend my position which is to your benefit.! MY GOD, no matter how much you love Porsche at least look out for your own interest and get what you paid for.
::::::::::::
I am flabbergasted that owners would defend Porsche to the detriment of their self interest. To buy a sport car which is designed for track events and not want/insist on getting an answer from the car manufacturer as to whether they extend the warranty coverage to these events is beyond my comprehension. "Lemming's over the cliff."
::::::::::
Finally, if I want a sanely exciting ride which gives GT and racing driving experience and holds its value, the Ferrari 430 is perfect.
:::::::
BTW, the British pro Porsche magazine had another article which was headlined "Why The AM V8 Vantage Will Pulverise Porsche".
:::::::
Take this to the bank. The rear engine concept was good while it lasted. Porsche is going to dump it despite howls from some of its enthusiast who are stuck in a time warp.
:::::
I have no doubt the 997 TT will perform at least on par with the 430. But with AWD and an engine hanging over its rear axle it will be a boring car to drive just as the 996 TT was.
:::::
Here is a comment from Motor Trend magazine regarding the 911 Cab.
"The Boxster S has been heavily revised for 2005 effectively making the 911 Cab.an expensive redundancy."
I am inclined to agree but for the backseat in the 911 though barely useable.
:::::::
The reality is you buy Porsche because it gives you performance and in your and others view BLING! .
You can tell yourself like others do that bling does not matter but you buy Porsche because it is a Porsche and there is a BLING BLING to it.
Why do you all deny what is plain on your face and people that know you? I read how Europeans find it vulgar in a business setting for someone to be driving a Porsche and how you owners are sensitive to the problem. Now why would Europeans think that way? Because it is a performance car or is it BLING BLING?
Stop fooling yourself and fess up. "I bought a Porsche because all my life I wanted one and once I began successful enough I fulfilled my dream BLING BLING .
::::::
If it isn't a joke then it only confirms what I have believed about Porsche. A money grabbing company.
The base 997 should have had the S power and the S should have the powerkit power. Instead, they make you pay through the nose for what you should have had. What is distressing about all this is they get away with it! Many S owners will fork out the extra money and line Porsches' pockets.
Those that do will soon learn they will not get one dime back on their powerkit cost.
If this rumor is true, Porsche thank you for not letting me down.
::::::
BTW your dealing with a mass producer of automobiles. Delays and poor workmanship are the norm. Accept it.
:::
(Quoting an article, posted it on the Porsche board)
Believe me I have had my ups and downs in life ( including losing more than 1.2 Mio US in a week in 1998) but this is really the best 200K I have EVER spent and now I know why Porsche makes 1.3 BN USD a year and Ferrari is strugging to breakeven....as they give you more.
::::::
PRO-PORSCHE (company or owners)
"Porsche is reputed to be the premier sport car for performance driving and most people buy Porsche's for performance."
God I only wish I had clients like you. 
