Quote:
FixedWing said:
It is impossible for me to either prove or know what would have happened had I handled the situation differently. How can anyone say for sure what would have been? That's impossible....
Stephen,
I am sorry, but this is all B.S.
First: You challenged the authority of the policeman. Since you knew you were going to be arrested, why did you call your mother?
Second: As a layman, I know a hearing is held to see if there is sufficient evidence to go to trial. There was sufficienct evidence. Second, your motion was out of place. Even if the cop treated you bad, there was sufficient evidence to hold you over for trial.
Third: You mention discovery. Discovery is for trial, not a hearing. The biggest mistake that you made was to represent yourself.
Fourth: Connecticut Superior Court Judge Patricia Swords did exactly what she is suppose to do. Your tape was inappropiate at that time. It was a hearing to see if there was enough evidence and set a trial date. And then you were late because as I read it, the Judge, the clerks, the whole system is in a conspiracy against you. I thought she did you a favor because she could have kept you in jail until the trial, yet she only increased your bail by $250.
Fifth: AND THE MOST DUMBEST THING YET, you fail to appear for your trial. Yet these same cops who were in a conspirarcy against you, let you turn yourself in and you complain about carrying $10,000 in bail money.
Sixth: Now the prosecutor is in the conspiracy and holds your trial till after lunch. Yet, I am sure that other court matters were going on during the morning. And they did this to arrest you at lunch? As an attorney, why did you not do your homework? There is no excuse that an attorney did not know that if you miss a court date for reckless driving, that your license is automatically suspended. And in most states,
driving with a suspended license is an arrestable offense. Yet they did not arrest you, so I guess the officer was or was not part of the conspiracy. I lost track with this one.
And then you mention discovery again. Discovery is for trial, not for a hearing. And then I lost track. Was it two different cases where you failed to appear? The reckless driving and a minor speeding ticket?
From your story, I find an individual who has total lack of respect of the law and has made numerous errors in judgement. And what really gets my goat is that this is from an attorney who is suppose to be an officer of the court. Yet he cries that the whole system and individuals are in some mass conspiracy against him.