Latest tested time in SPORT AUTO: 8 min 17 sec for the Nordschleife (996 Carrera 2 facelift with 18'' and 285s on the rear). Hockenheim (Kleiner Kurs): 1 min 17,1 sec.
If somebody thinks that this car may have had a weak engine, the 0-125 mph accel. time has been stopped at 17.3 sec., only around one second slowlier than on the 997 Carrera S.
I think that the 20 mm chassis is a great achievement, especially with the limited slip differential which comes with it. Whoever is a very sporty driver and has the chance to get the 20 mm chassis in his country, GO for it, you won't regret it. PASM is a great compromise but compromise stays compromise. But still: a PASM equipped car is much faster on the track than a 996.
Also interesting: the tested 996 Carrera 2 had a weight of 1467 kg, a tested 997 Carrera S had "only" 1455 kg. Both values are MEASURED values, not factory claims.
The tested 997 Carrera S did 1 min 15,6 sec in Hockenheim (Kleiner Ring) but Sport Auto mentioned that the test conditions were very bad because of extremely high outside air/asphalt temperatures. I suppose a PASM equipped car should do Hockenheim (Kleiner Ring) in around 1 min 15 sec, maybe even slightly better. The 20 mm chassis equipped car is rumoured (test results will be published in Sport Auto as soon as they get the chance to test the car on the Nordschleife) to have achieved 1 min 14 seconds in Hockenheim (Kleiner Ring). Better time than the 996 Turbo and GT3 Mk1.