Quote:
Are these the only two choices?
You cannot set the format to DD MMMMMM YYYY ??
In correspondence, I will always use the full version to avoid confusion (i.e. 11 February 2003).
The trouble with the MMM DD, YY format is that it is only used in North America. That's because it is backwards.
It is a matter of Yankee imperialism. If you allow the United States to dictate standards then who knows what might happen next? Hell, they might even start thinking that they can rule the world and attack any country that dissagrees at will!
Humm ... am i off topic?
Stephen
Oh boy, yes you're off-topic.
But since we have a tensed worldwide situation right now, I close my eyes (if the Admin does too).
I'm not sure if you used sarcasm in your post or not but I want to make something clear and this is purely my personal opinion:
The Yankee "Imperialism" as you call it got rid of Hitler, the USSR and Milosevic. If we also think about the freedoms coming to Europe over the past decades, we know for sure where it came from. Europe wasn't really prepared for democracy until the Yankee "Imperialism" somehow imposed it.
You travelled to Eastern Europe and I guess you saw with your own eyes what it looks like. It is easy for us to drive through poor countries in a Porsche and then comment about Yankee "Imperialism", sorry to say that. History repeats itself, Europe doesn't learn from it. Nobody really wants war, this is BS. What we watch today is a media war. And people get influenced by the media. The media doesn't like Bush, so people read all kind of BS about him and the reasons why America wants to go to war. On the other hand I have to admit that the US could learn a lot from the former USSR propaganda machine. If it comes to propaganda, the US isn't good at it at all. I worked in Eastern Europe and as far as you might know, I had access to a lot of information from international people. I also remember an arab diplomat who told me that he has a lot of respect for Germans because Hitler did what he did. Fact is: America has been attacked by Al Kaida. Fact is: there is no consipracy whatsoever regarding this attack as many people suggest on the internet (I almost throw up when I read all the BS about conspiracy theories). Fact is: America always took out the hot potatoes out of the fire when Europeans were bitching around like old virgins.
Fact is: Europe always profits (and profitted) from US actions. Fact is: our cancellor Schroeder put himself into deep sh.t to win the elections, it was never his intention to go that far. Now he can't back off due to his own party friends and he put the whole european community in jeopardy.
The population is influenced by the media, most people don't have real facts and political backgrounds like me and others have. Nobody wants war, whoever wants war is an idiot. But sometimes enough is enough. The US is under heavy pressure due to the terrorist threat. If they don't start to control the spreading of weapons of mass destruction, something even worse than WTC will happen. I guess nobody is naive not to realize that.
I try to give you a little example of our own naive wishful thinking: last week I talked to a guy who works in Eastern Europe. He visited a region (you've been there...remember the picture you sent me?) of poverty and destroyed nature. After seeing that, he told me that he can't believe that such a country was a threat for NATO. Well, he is right. There was (and is) poverty among the population but when it comes to the military, things look different. People don't realize that. Look at North Korea: the population doesn't have enough food, they don't know what a DVD player or a Porsche is (not to mention a private car of ANY kind) but they have nuclear weapons or at least modern rocket technology.
For us Europeans it is easy to stay with our hands in the pockets and profit from US actions. Where would have been Europe now without the US? Or do our swiss friends really think that Hitler would have respected international agreements? Look what he has done to Belgium, a neutral country in the 40s.
For me personally, it is difficult to understand: it seems the media makes a devil out of Bush but a victim out of Saddam Hussein and other dictators.
But maybe I should stop now before this gets too far.
One last thing though: I'm curious what you would say if your wife or some of your friends will be a victim in a future terror attack. It is always to speak a sharp tongue when it doesn't affect one directly.
I know that US politics weren't always the best but right now, the US government has no choice. And I bet with you: if Bill Clinton was in charge right now, he would have done the same. Forgot about his failed "Cruise Missile" adventure against Al Kaida and Bin Laden in Afghanistan?
Bush is unlucky: he's conservative (the media is always liberal) and there has been a lot of BS published about his mental abilities and his family. Well, he's in charge now but don't forget that he is NOT the US government, just a part of it. And I'm sure that if America goes to war, the Democrats will back him. Wanna bet?!