Mar 29, 2019 7:40:41 PM
- CGX car nut
- Rennteam Master
- Loc: NWI , United States
- Posts: 5183, Gallery
- Registered on: Aug 17, 2011
- Reply to: Whoopsy
Re: Porsche Mission E...the future of Porsche?
Whoopsy:Mithras:Whoopsy:Porsche has logged over 6 million km of testing mileage on the Taycan. And another 10 million km on simulator.
They also tested the car from -35 to +50 degree Celsius.
Think Tesla tested theirs even a 1/4 of that amount?
No you're right, they've sold almost 400,000 cars but have never done any testing or especially any simulations (they're not tech savvy enough for that...). And unlike every other car company they've never tested through temp ranges and inclement weather.
They've also sold almost 400,000 cars, all of which upload data back to tesla. Even though the majority of sales are in the last two years let's say that each car on average has 10,000 miles on it. That's 4 BILLION miles of data. Does porsche or anyone else have even a 1/4 of that amount?
Difference being, Porsche tested the car first before selling them to customers, Tesla is using the paying customers as guinea pigs.
Since Tesla is leading the way for data collection forefront, Perhaps Porsche will be doing the same with the Taycan?
There are things on the fly over the air update can fix, but there are things about hardware that it' can't be fixed. Hence why pre production testing is crucial.
Right now, Tesla KNOWS their battery can't handle high drain for extend period of time, as someone here have said it, their Tesla goes into semi-limp mode after a while on the autobahn. That's a hardware design flaw that over the air update cannot correct.
A car in private service has an infinitely easier life than an automaker's test car fleet undergoing testing and final certification. A few thousand miles of testing on the Nürburgring is the equivalent of a hundred thousand miles, if not more, on the public streets. What else isn't mentioned with the miles driven analogy is the amount of bench testing that takes place during a typical vehicle's development. Components and subsystems are rigorously tested to failure and beyond. I have yet to see Tesla illustrate even the a rudimentary testing protocol that Porsche, for example, used in the 1960s and 70s.
On a similar note, I remain incredulous of Telsa's new claims that its cars are of such high quality that annual service intervals are no longer required. This decision comes after Tesla announced the closing, then maybe not, of its retail network to lower costs. Reducing maintenance intervals also reduces the level of investment in dedicated service centers, again effectively lowering Tesla's expenditures, but at what cost?