Jan 16, 2008 9:25:58 PM
Jan 17, 2008 7:52:39 AM
Quote:
Lars997 said:
Stunning interior, especially the Glassroof is just awesome!
DB9 Front looks a bit to old for me, its a pity that they didnt make any more fashy, modern front!
Quote:
luwalira said:Quote:
Lars997 said:
Stunning interior, especially the Glassroof is just awesome!
DB9 Front looks a bit to old for me, its a pity that they didnt make any more fashy, modern front!
The DB9 is actually 5 years old(cam out in 2003) so IMO it doesn't look as stunning any longer. The Rapide would have been fine like it is if they would have introduced it in 2005. But now a decade later it's not exciting at all and will neither have performance to match the M5 or Panamera. AM should have done something to the head and tail lights but I guess they are a little lost without the magician Henrik Frisker.
I think that people will be much more excited over the Panamera and up coming Audi A7 which will be out in 2009.
Quote:
luwalira said:Quote:
Lars997 said:
Stunning interior, especially the Glassroof is just awesome!
DB9 Front looks a bit to old for me, its a pity that they didnt make any more fashy, modern front!
The DB9 is actually 5 years old(cam out in 2003) so IMO it doesn't look as stunning any longer. The Rapide would have been fine like it is if they would have introduced it in 2005. But now a decade later it's not exciting at all and will neither have performance to match the M5 or Panamera. AM should have done something to the head and tail lights but I guess they are a little lost without the magician Henrik Frisker.
I think that people will be much more excited over the Panamera and up coming Audi A7 which will be out in 2009.
Jan 18, 2008 8:20:49 AM
Quote:Correct! In 2005 with 450HP it would be a great car. In 2010 I think this kind of cars should have more than 550 HP to be on the same level.
luwalira said:
The DB9 is actually 5 years old(cam out in 2003) so IMO it doesn't look as stunning any longer. The Rapide would have been fine like it is if they would have introduced it in 2005. But now a decade later it's not exciting at all and will neither have performance to match the M5 or Panamera. AM should have done something to the head and tail lights but I guess they are a little lost without the magician Henrik Frisker.
I think that people will be much more excited over the Panamera and up coming Audi A7 which will be out in 2009.
Jan 19, 2008 8:15:49 AM
Quote:
turbosteff said:Quote:Correct! In 2005 with 450HP it would be a great car. In 2010 I think this kind of cars should have more than 550 HP to be on the same level.
luwalira said:
The DB9 is actually 5 years old(cam out in 2003) so IMO it doesn't look as stunning any longer. The Rapide would have been fine like it is if they would have introduced it in 2005. But now a decade later it's not exciting at all and will neither have performance to match the M5 or Panamera. AM should have done something to the head and tail lights but I guess they are a little lost without the magician Henrik Frisker.
I think that people will be much more excited over the Panamera and up coming Audi A7 which will be out in 2009.
Quote:
KresoF1 said:Quote:
temm said:
Did George drive a production version or pre-production Rapide?
NO. KF posted link to pretty old article: AUTO BILD 22/2006 - 07.06.2006
Quote:
i'm sorry. Maybe this is brandnew... DBS Convertible
Quote:
temm said:
Next to this the Panamera (and every other "4-door coupe" for that matter) is going to look