Dec 21, 2007 2:30:12 PM
- JoeRockhead
- Rennteam VIP
- Loc: Topside , Monaco
- Posts: 8033, Gallery
- Registered on: Sep 17, 2007
- Reply to: lambornima
Re: GT-R 0-60 in 3.3 S
Quote:
lambornima said:Quote:
JoeRockhead said:
Here are some more numbers for you:
According to a 1/4 mile calculator, if the Nissan weighs 1780kg, plus I'm assuming a 160lb driver, and did the quarter mile at 11.6 @ 120.9 mph as Edmunds claims, the car would need 666hp.
If the car has 473hp as stated in Edmunds, using the same weight, the car has the power to do a 1/4 mile in 12.6 seconds, within 95% accuracy. The car would have to weigh 1600kg, or 500lbs less than the stated weight to achieve the 11.6 seconds stated in the article.
Further, with a vehicle weight of 4050lbs, curb weight plus driver, and a claimed 473hp with AWD, the car is capable of 4.0088 second 0 - 60 times. This assumes the car hooks up and doesn't include any turbo lag, (full 473hp at launch).
No amount of 'new technology' can overcome the laws of physics. So in other words, someone is lying.
Nissan is the someone. the car is making 480 hp at all 4 wheels, not at the crank. this explains the acceleration, 1/4 mile and Sportauto Nring time of 7:50. OR Nissan is giving BS press cars to everyone and the car is making 473 hp at the crank. I used to be a none believer, but Im now thinking that the former is whats going on.
The figure of 480HP at the wheels would explain the acceleration. If the Nissan is making 480HP at the wheels, it's making close to 600HP at the flywheel. You can't get a 3850lb car to do a quarter mile in 11.6 seconds with 480 HP at the flywheel. I don't care if you're David Copperfield; all the magic in the world can't ignore the laws of physics!