Re: GTR Review by Motor Trend...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aNX6p2PojYMc&refer=home
Quote:
thuggy said:
Death bell on the USD has not been rung yet... interesting view point...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aNX6p2PojYMc&refer=home
Quote:
The Groom said:
9 is very bad. The historical average since 1900 is 14 - and there have been a few anni horribiles in the lot.
Basket cases like GM and Ford are around 10. General Electric is 18. Procter & Gamble is 22.
Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
The Groom said:
9 is very bad. The historical average since 1900 is 14 - and there have been a few anni horribiles in the lot.
Basket cases like GM and Ford are around 10. General Electric is 18. Procter & Gamble is 22.
Talk to any seasoned trader and ALL will tell you a P/E of 9 is great. Your better off buying a stock with a P/E 9 than 18 or 35.
Quote:
nberry said:
Talk to any seasoned trader and ALL will tell you a P/E of 9 is great. Your better off buying a stock with a P/E 9 than 18 or 35.
Quote:
The Groom said:Quote:
nberry said:
Talk to any seasoned trader and ALL will tell you a P/E of 9 is great. Your better off buying a stock with a P/E 9 than 18 or 35.
You clearly misunderstand what the P/E ratio is. It's NOT a measure of whether a stock is cheap or expensive. It's a measure of anticipated earning growth.
The most important - and most overlooked - thing about the P/E ratio is that its numerator is forward-looking (current market cap = expectations of future earnings), whereas its divisor is backward-looking (last published earnings).
A low P/E means that the market anticipates that future earnings will be much lower than last year's.
Sometimes, the market is wrong - that's how Mr Buffett made his fortune. But sometimes, the market is right, and the company is really going under. Thing is, you cannot tell only by looking at the P/E.
Quote:
nberry said:
Bottom line is, if I am trying to decide between two stocks, the one with the lower P/E is, at least to me, is much more attractive.
Nov 13, 2007 2:22:37 PM