video: 9.911 sec 1/4 run
enjoy,
BTW, we drove the car to the track and back
markski
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rETttXPn5o
Quote:
CGT1178 said:
i think no daily use car can bring this number ..
did you race with any supercar ?
Quote:
markski said:Quote:
CGT1178 said:
i think no daily use car can bring this number ..
did you race with any supercar ?
no not yet.... but Ill be doing a 0 to 300 km very soon... it will be good to compare to the P car supercars... I believe the record is 21.2 seconds...
markski
Quote:
J.Seven said:Quote:
markski said:Quote:
CGT1178 said:
i think no daily use car can bring this number ..
did you race with any supercar ?
no not yet.... but Ill be doing a 0 to 300 km very soon... it will be good to compare to the P car supercars... I believe the record is 21.2 seconds...
markski
Great ideia , for European standards 0-300Kph is more interesting than 1/4
J.Seven
Quote:
markski said:
no not yet.... but Ill be doing a 0 to 300 km very soon... it will be good to compare to the P car supercars... I believe the record is 21.2 seconds...
markski
Quote:
GT2ETR said:Quote:
markski said:
no not yet.... but Ill be doing a 0 to 300 km very soon... it will be good to compare to the P car supercars... I believe the record is 21.2 seconds...
markski
Now you are talking, the real men's standard. Gemballa's GTR 750 (21.7s in 2002) is a better comparison, full 4WD weight and no aerodynamic aids.
Quote:
GT2ETR said:
Crash
You make a good observation and you could be right . There is conflicting information about this car.
According to Sport Auto it was a GT2 based 2WD car, however Uwe Gemballa contradicted this information and I know of at least one with 4WD that is based on a 996TT and not a GT2. The tested car by Sport Auto weighed 1550 Kgs which is inline with a TT rather than a GT2 based 2WD car, I will try to find the article.
It was a 3.8 Ltr engine with twin Garrett T035 turbochargers and using GT3R heads and camshafts, stock 996TT gear ratios with 19 inch rims. The surprising thing is that it reached those numbers despite the (seriously) ugly monumental rear wing.
A true monster from 2002, still unbeaten except for a purpose built max speed 9FF car. There are still a few out there running the streets (and more than one of them for sale)
Edit: I found the article. Here is the performance data. Notice how the 0-100 km/h was only 4.1 seconds as a result of traction loss, and still managed those numbers. On a drag race circuit, it would have gained another 1 second at a minimum.
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
GT2ETR said:
Crash
You make a good observation and you could be right . There is conflicting information about this car.
According to Sport Auto it was a GT2 based 2WD car, however Uwe Gemballa contradicted this information and I know of at least one with 4WD that is based on a 996TT and not a GT2. The tested car by Sport Auto weighed 1550 Kgs which is inline with a TT rather than a GT2 based 2WD car, I will try to find the article.
It was a 3.8 Ltr engine with twin Garrett T035 turbochargers and using GT3R heads and camshafts, stock 996TT gear ratios with 19 inch rims. The surprising thing is that it reached those numbers despite the (seriously) ugly monumental rear wing.
A true monster from 2002, still unbeaten except for a purpose built max speed 9FF car. There are still a few out there running the streets (and more than one of them for sale)
Edit: I found the article. Here is the performance data. Notice how the 0-100 km/h was only 4.1 seconds as a result of traction loss, and still managed those numbers. On a drag race circuit, it would have gained another 1 second at a minimum.
GT2ETR, I have no doubt that there are possibly two versions (AWD & RWD) of the car available. Regarding the car used in the test, the text in the excerpt leads me to believe that the car tested is RWD (it talks about the Murcielago accomplishing the same task in 3.6 seconds, thanks to AWD).
Edit: Those are some monstrous numbers and, comparing the 100 to 300 km/h time, the Gemballa is only marginally slower than the Veyron.
Quote:
964C2 said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
GT2ETR said:
Crash
You make a good observation and you could be right . There is conflicting information about this car.
According to Sport Auto it was a GT2 based 2WD car, however Uwe Gemballa contradicted this information and I know of at least one with 4WD that is based on a 996TT and not a GT2. The tested car by Sport Auto weighed 1550 Kgs which is inline with a TT rather than a GT2 based 2WD car, I will try to find the article.
It was a 3.8 Ltr engine with twin Garrett T035 turbochargers and using GT3R heads and camshafts, stock 996TT gear ratios with 19 inch rims. The surprising thing is that it reached those numbers despite the (seriously) ugly monumental rear wing.
A true monster from 2002, still unbeaten except for a purpose built max speed 9FF car. There are still a few out there running the streets (and more than one of them for sale)
Edit: I found the article. Here is the performance data. Notice how the 0-100 km/h was only 4.1 seconds as a result of traction loss, and still managed those numbers. On a drag race circuit, it would have gained another 1 second at a minimum.
GT2ETR, I have no doubt that there are possibly two versions (AWD & RWD) of the car available. Regarding the car used in the test, the text in the excerpt leads me to believe that the car tested is RWD (it talks about the Murcielago accomplishing the same task in 3.6 seconds, thanks to AWD).
Edit: Those are some monstrous numbers and, comparing the 100 to 300 km/h time, the Gemballa is only marginally slower than the Veyron.
According to Excellence Magazine (September issue), the Sportec SPR1 (802HP) went 0-100km/h in 3.0sec., 0-200km/h in 8.6sec. and 0-300km/h in 18.9 sec., last fall at Nardo.
Quote:964C2, I know you must have read it, but truth is they never achieved that time, this is what Ulrich Hodel claimed, unproven so far.
964C2 said:
According to Excellence Magazine (September issue), the Sportec SPR1 (802HP) went .........and 0-300km/h in 18.9 sec., last fall at Nardo.
Quote:
Powerstar said:
is it the stock motronic ?
usually if you try to change things in the stock one the anti-theft device becomes activated ?