Nov 24, 2006 12:14:27 AM
- cibergypsy
- Pilot
- Loc: FL, USA , United States
- Posts: 366, Gallery
- Registered on: Mar 21, 2006
Nov 24, 2006 12:14:27 AM
Nov 24, 2006 2:27:18 AM
Quote:
catdog said:
Do the carrera and carrera s have some redeeming feature re. reliability or mileage or lower maintenance requirements? It would be nice to hear the real reason behind not choosing the GT-1 engine
Nov 24, 2006 3:17:48 AM
Nov 24, 2006 10:11:13 AM
Nov 24, 2006 1:09:28 PM
Quote:
boytronic said:
Perhaps it is cost of manufacture versus increased profit margins for Por$che?
When I enquired with Porsche UK about engine problems on the 996 series, they quoted GBP Pounds10k to replace a wet sump engine and Pounds40k to replace a dry sump Turbo/GT engine.
If you want to track your beloved "integrated sump" Porsche, but face the risk of engine problems if you do, then I think there is a problem - we are being short-changed by the new Porsche...
Nov 26, 2006 1:26:13 PM
Nov 26, 2006 4:23:36 PM
Nov 27, 2006 9:17:38 PM
Nov 28, 2006 6:50:37 PM
Nov 29, 2006 7:28:11 AM
Nov 29, 2006 7:41:11 AM
Nov 29, 2006 7:25:48 PM
Quote:
Dan L said:
We're really lucky that Porsche worked with the Japanese to learn how to build a car. Otherwise Porsche could have very easily gone the way of every other exotic sports car that today has been snatched up by some other company, and offered as a boutique car. (Sort of like with Leica cameras within that mess,--but that's another subject).
dan
Quote:
MMD said:Quote:
ERdoc said:
As a Leica shooter/collector/dealer, I know very well what you mean.
Hey, since the digital photography conquest, what's my Leica M6 worth? Pristine condition; bought new in 1992.