Crown
Board: Porsche - Cayenne
Language: English
Region: Worldwide
Close
CloseForum - Thread
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison
Last month dad was attempting to buy one of these ML63's but i stopped him. I think it is crazy to give that money for a suv. It performance it f..ing crazy especially
0-100:5 and 0-200: 17.7 sec. It is nearly Carrera S tiptronic time. However it is 40.000 Euro expensive than Carrera S.
I think best suitable engine power for any SUV is around 300-350 hp thats enough imo.
That ML63 is beast but useless for that price
0-100:5 and 0-200: 17.7 sec. It is nearly Carrera S tiptronic time. However it is 40.000 Euro expensive than Carrera S.
I think best suitable engine power for any SUV is around 300-350 hp thats enough imo.
That ML63 is beast but useless for that price
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison
Quote:
ElTonioni said:
But does it go around corners like a CTT?
Why on earth are so many people obsessed with drag strip times?
... or, can it go off-road like a Cayenne? I know this function is of little interest to most SUV owners, especially the pricey ones we are talking about here, but off-road capability is a basic function of an SUV. If it can't go off-road, why even use the SUV form factor? Why not get a minivan?
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison
They(AMS) said that ML63 is better on the road then Cayenne Turbo S! But, Cayenne is marginally better in off-road situation(but, only with off-road tires!).
Regarding everything else their verdict is pretty clear-Cayenne even in Turbo S is dated... And cost around 20000Euro more in Germany then similary spec ML63...
Regarding everything else their verdict is pretty clear-Cayenne even in Turbo S is dated... And cost around 20000Euro more in Germany then similary spec ML63...
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road compariso
Motorvision (german car video test review magazine) overall still likes CayenneTTS a little more than ML63 as an SUV... 
...here is a video
CayTTS vs ML63 review
Enjoy,
OZRacing
...here is a video
CayTTS vs ML63 review
Enjoy,
OZRacing
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road compariso
Quote:
ozr said:
Motorvision (german car video test review magazine) overall still likes CayenneTTS a little more than ML63 as an SUV...
...here is a video
CayTTS vs ML63 review
Enjoy,
OZRacing
Here is a summary of the video:
They listed the plus and minus for each vehicle
Cayenne Turbo S
+ Performance
+ Off Road
+ Top Speed
- Basic price
- Weight
ML63 AMG
+ Cost
+ Acceleration
- Performance
- Weight
- Consumption
Phil
Re: Cayenne Turbo S against ML63AMG-AMS Cross Road comparison
Quote:
ElTonioni said:
But does it go around corners like a CTT?
Why on earth are so many people obsessed with drag strip times?
In two key areas of performance the Porsche is the winner. Autozeitung tested the ML63 verses the Cayenne Turbo S.
Slalom
Cayenne Turbo S 61.9 km/h
ML63 AMG 58.7 km/h
Braking 100 km/h to 0 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S - 36.1
ML63 AMG - 37.3
Both of these measures of performance are more important to me than the ML being slightly faster in a drag race. Let them chase me through the twisties.
Phil
Forum
About Rennteam | Help | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Support | Contact | Imprint | Archive
Powered by
Community
and
