Jul 4, 2006 9:21:58 AM
- Boxster Coupe GTS
- Rennteam Master
- Loc: UK , United Kingdom
- Posts: 5884, Gallery
- Registered on: Feb 23, 2005
Jul 4, 2006 9:21:58 AM
Jul 4, 2006 9:24:47 AM
Jul 4, 2006 9:32:34 AM
Jul 4, 2006 9:38:55 AM
Jul 4, 2006 9:51:42 AM
Jul 4, 2006 2:02:55 PM
Jul 4, 2006 2:19:34 PM
Jul 4, 2006 5:21:04 PM
Jul 4, 2006 6:33:11 PM
Quote:
STRADALE said:
Magazines still dont get the part about storage space. Giving a higher mark to the 430 over the 997 when you could easily fit more than twice as much stuff in the 997 using the storage behind the front seats. The car should have won by even more points.
But they're right about the 997 and 430 beating the other 2 wanna be cars........ Even giving the vette a huge 20 extra points over the F430 (40 vs 20) in the price department AND they gave more points in the depreciation to the vette versus the Ferrari (LOL) ...... 997 turbo & F430 the best 2 all around sport cars period.
Jul 4, 2006 7:06:22 PM
Quote:
VKSF said:
430 has a MB-like 28gall fuel tank, unlike 997TT's commuting-incompatible <18gall tank...
Quote:
svtrader1 said:
how does the much heavier Turbo outbrake the F430?
Quote:
Gary(SF) said:
I think the 997TT is a wonderful car, but looking at the numbers it is clear it won this comparison test in the "Body" and "Costs" areas, not the performance area.
Gary
Quote:
JP66 said:Quote:
Gary(SF) said:
I think the 997TT is a wonderful car, but looking at the numbers it is clear it won this comparison test in the "Body" and "Costs" areas, not the performance area.
Gary
The 997TT didn't "win" in the performance section, because the Lambo and Ferrari had higher points in the "facination and sound" departments....nothing to do with performance Take away the points for those 2 elements on all the cars and the performance areas were pretty even.
BTW, I love your car too
Quote:
Gary(SF) said:Quote:
JP66 said:Quote:
Gary(SF) said:
I think the 997TT is a wonderful car, but looking at the numbers it is clear it won this comparison test in the "Body" and "Costs" areas, not the performance area.
Gary
The 997TT didn't "win" in the performance section, because the Lambo and Ferrari had higher points in the "facination and sound" departments....nothing to do with performance Take away the points for those 2 elements on all the cars and the performance areas were pretty even.
BTW, I love your car too
You've got a point. I wish they would just reduce it to subjective and objective results, it's too much work filtering out the relevant results. Even though I do value an engaging exhaust note, it's not really a performance issue.
Gary
Jul 5, 2006 3:27:55 AM
Quote:
VKSF said:Area behind 997TT front seats is worthless from a storage standpoint...would never want internally-launched missles in any severe deceleration....
Jul 5, 2006 4:22:19 AM
Quote:
Dock (Atlanta) said:Quote:
VKSF said:Area behind 997TT front seats is worthless from a storage standpoint...would never want internally-launched missles in any severe deceleration....
When I travel I throw my soft-sided/canvas bag with all my clothes/shoes/other stuff behind the front seats...on top of the lowered rear seatbacks. I don't worry at all about it from a safety standpoint.
As for the 17 gallon fuel tank, I don't find it a problem at all.
Jul 5, 2006 6:58:25 AM
Quote:
TulsaTurbo said:
21.6 mpg (manf) times 17.7 gallons gives a range of 382 miles. How many of us go that distance without stopping for food or bathroom? I'd like to see an F430 get that kind of range!
Quote:
svtrader1 said:Quote:
TulsaTurbo said:
21.6 mpg (manf) times 17.7 gallons gives a range of 382 miles. How many of us go that distance without stopping for food or bathroom? I'd like to see an F430 get that kind of range!
I wouldn't put to much stock in any manufacturer's numbers. In real world driving, the F430 does out range the turbo as per the article.