My Cayenne Turbo S cost just about doubled my Range Rover SVR.
It is a much better car no matter the standard, nothing the SVR wins except in price. But is the Cayenne 2x better? No.
If Land Rover dump some extra money into the SVR and make it better and more luxurious, say 50k more, then the SVR will win the battle.
Every time I open the door of my Cayenne, it present itself as a luxury car, all the nice leather, stitching, carbon trim, etc. (Well I did paid for all of those by checking every single option box).
On the other hand, every time I open the door to the SVR, I can't help but feel like it's a fucking cheap ass car and I paid WHAT for it? The leather feels cheap. The aluminum felt cheap. Infotainment system felt cheap. Fit and finish felt cheap. (Almost like American car cheap, it tried really hard to look expensive but the facade is not working). Reliability is non-existent (I have both cars together for roughly the same time, the SVR is like 1 month older, but the SVR spent way more time at the dealership fixing stuff) The Cayenne was also at the dealership a lot too but it was because I ran out of parking.
There SVR at least wins one category on showing itself to be expensive, it projects the Land Rover badge on the floor from the door, something's missing in the Cayenne.
BUT at the end of the day, Land Rover still has that cachet for the uninformed, my wife don't know cars but she really likes her Land Rover, but so does the Kardashians.
--