I just got my second offer from my dealer, looks good so far, 36 months lease only (instead of 48 months), which gives me more options if a facelift shows up and/or if I get bored with the car. Now I have to decide... (October delivery guaranteed). Also don't forget that the dealer takes my PTS in (which still has 36 months of the lease left), no questions asked, which is a huge bonus for me.
Right now, I have mixed feelings about the 991 Turbo S. Yes, I want this car but on the other hand, I also like the 991 GT3 a lot and it seems to be the better value right now. Still, the 991 Turbo S has some serious advantages over the GT3 and since I wouldn't track race the GT3 very often, the 991 Turbo S actually makes more sense in a region with lots of rain and snow (winter time).
Depreciation isn't really an issue for me since I lease the car. I would love to buy the car but 200k EUR is a lot of money and I would probably loose 40k EUR the moment I register the car on my name. Of course I could wait until some used cars are available but I get the feeling that this time, the 991 Turbo will actually sell better than the 991 Turbo S. I know many 997 Turbo S owners over here, on the last driving event we had three Turbo S with us (eight cars only), so go figure. Maybe I am wrong but if someone doesn't really want the PCCB and doesn't really put a lot of additional options into a 991 Turbo, the price difference between the Turbo and Turbo S would be 30-35k EUR, which is a lot of money. Since the performance difference seems to be minimal, at least on paper (0-200 kph in 10.3 seconds for the Turbo S and 10.8 seconds for the Turbo), I can imagine that some potential buyers will go for the regular Turbo instead. I know, at this price range, maybe money isn't that much of an issue but when 997 Turbo S owners talk about high fuel cost, I think that money still matters to (some of) them.
I am still a little bit offended by the thought that the 40 hp power difference between the 991 Turbo and Turbo S would be based on software only. Yes, Turbo S owners also get the "Turbo S" lettering in the speedo cluster, the logo in the PCM and the logo on the active front spoiler lip but still...is the software worth the 10k EUR or so (excluding PCCB) difference? I get it, Porsche had development cost and of course the new 991 Turbo S has a better standard equipment than the old one (not that something important was missing) but I think Porsche is standing on thin ice here, unless they know something I don't know.
A short while ago, I came off the phone with somebody who knows the 991 Turbo S quite well. He told me, so the rumors seem to be true, that 90% of the 991 Turbo/S has been built NEW from the ground up. This car has almost nothing in common with the old 997 Turbo. He also told me that the new 991 Turbo uses similar PDK improvements like the GT3 and according to him, he suspects that the 991 Turbo/S use the new GT3 engine as a basis for the bi-turbo engine. This isn't 100% sure however, he only had the chance to see some development data which seem to point into that direction.
Unfortunately he also claims that the difference between the Turbo and Turbo S is software only, so theoretically, it should be possible to use the Turbo S software to "upgrade" the Turbo if the car has PDDC and the Sport Chrono package (otherwise, the Turbo S software should be difficult to use because the Turbo S has these options standard and the software "expects" to "see" these options, I cannot explain it better). The question is: How would Porsche void the warranty on a modified Turbo (with Turbo S software) because it is actually their own software and there is no hardware difference? Could they claim additional stress? I don't think so. Interesting stuff...for lawyers.
Next week I have to decide which route I go (GT3 or Turbo S) but right now, it seems I am going the Turbo S route.
--
RC (Germany) - Rennteam Editor Porsche Panamera Turbo S, Cayenne GTS (958), BMW X3 35d (2012), Mini Cooper S Countryman All4