Jan 30, 2011 9:09:42 AM
To be honest looks a bit fake to me (the speed difference), what do you guys think?
Jan 30, 2011 9:44:45 AM
The speed differential is spot on. The different lines could be explained by the overlapping images.
Jan 30, 2011 11:30:16 AM
it's not a 100% overlap. for example the viewing angle is slightly different and this gives a different impression of speed for both types of cars. The F1 cars look much too quick in comparison, IMO at least.
Jan 30, 2011 11:34:29 AM
F1 cars take the Eau Rouge flat out at nearly 300 kph. GT cars are almost 100 kph down on them. The speed difference is correct IMO.
Jan 30, 2011 12:19:51 PM
F1 cars are designed for sprint races of some 90 mins, whereas GT cars for much longer ones, 1000km, 24H etc.
Therefore, the comparison serves no purpose IMO.
--
"Form follows function"
Jan 30, 2011 2:01:53 PM
REALZEUS: F1 cars take the Eau Rouge flat out at nearly 300 kph. GT cars are almost 100 kph down on them. The speed difference is correct IMO.
but this video suggests a far higher speed difference than only 100 kph
Jan 31, 2011 10:11:18 AM
I think the angle with the F1 cars is lower, that's why the speed difference in the beginning is is higher. In the climb it looks more realistic.
List display threaded List display flat
Post display threaded Post display flat
Show sticky Hide sticky