Quote:
BD 997 said:
Did they invite C&D? Or did C&D just gather info and wrote the article??
24-gen-2006 6.40.52
Quote:
CF said:
I saw this car a couple of weeks ago
http://www.rennteam.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=176259&an=0&page=0#176259
Quote:
RC said:Quote:
BD 997 said:
so it was a "test drive"...?
A test drive without actually driving in the car? Well...
24-gen-2006 9.31.03
Quote:
SoCalHoosier said:
Looks like we'll have to wait for the Turbo S or GT2 to be able to handle a Z06.
24-gen-2006 9.31.44
24-gen-2006 9.49.18
Quote:
guy2 said:
have a look here:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0512_rivals_data_panel.pdf
so why should the turbo be slower?
24-gen-2006 10.35.37
Quote:
SoCalHoosier said:Quote:
guy2 said:
have a look here:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0512_rivals_data_panel.pdf
so why should the turbo be slower?
If some of you would just set your Porsche egos to the side for a moment we may actually force Porsche to give us better cars initially instead of holding back...
Do the math the Z06 weighs at least 100 kgs less and is rated at 500 HP. Top speed is 198. Even if it's GM's funny numbers and the car actually only had 473 HP as well, the weight disparity would still hamper the turbo.
http://www.topgear.com/drives/CB/A1/roadtests/03/01.html
24-gen-2006 11.02.12
24-gen-2006 11.11.43