Crown

Board: Porsche - 911 - 997 Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    This is the last reply in the 'PASM-handling' thread, which we should all pay some attention to. This effect has been noted in NA, European, UK PASMs, and now has been resolved ---- and we 2005 997/997S owners need a Porsche recall!!
    Now follow this ----

    Quote: Paul S in TX said:
    "Read through the article linked in the thread on the PCA Club Coupe Article found in the Feb 06 Excellence. They said that they didn't find the anomaly in the 06 and mentioned a "cure" of rotating the bushings 90 degrees in the suspension (flip flops the soft and hard sides of the bushings to alleviate the sway/lurch issues noted in the earlier press reports on PASM)"

    AeroSmith:"I just read this article myself"

    From EXCELLENCE: Quote:
    "As the realization that the 2006 Club Coupe's handling is nothing short of incredible filters in, another realization comes up: This 997 has PASM. It's a system Excellence and Autocar have pointedly criticized in 2005 997s. Our concern revolves around a disturbing mid-corner lurch in the rear end of PASM-equipped 997s-something that's just not there in this car."

    AeroSmith: "Yep, it's not there in my 2006 CS-X51 either.And more from EXCELLENCE":Quote:"Then we realize this is the first 2006 997 with PASM that we've driven. PAG will probably never admit a change has been made, but we suspect a revision to the rear suspension bushings. Olaf Manthey, a well respected Porsche tuner based in at the Nurburgring, says that the 997's PASM "lurch" can be eliminated by turning selected rear suspension bushings--meant to be hard in one direction and soft in another--90 degrees. Porsche's solution is probably a better fix. We'll need to spend more time in 2006 997Ss--but, for the time being, our reservations about PASM and 997s appear to be obsolete."

    AeroSmith: "This may be why I don't sense anything wrong in my 2006's PASM handling characteristics. I guess it's just a 2005 thing. KiwiCanuck, I'm sorry. I now realize that we're driving two different PASM equiped cars and that the problem you describe has been eliminated from my '06."

    Now this is me, KiwiCanuck: I suggest that we all check for this effect, which I had no trouble in finding. It COULD be a matter of quality control and tolerences (in a $100K Porsche Carrera?!), so that all NA cars MAY not troubled with it. But I suspect that it is there for all of us, or at least certain months of production, as EXCELLENCE found this in EVERY PASM 997 they drove in NA and Europe.

    I am very displeased with Porsche, as this should have shown up in production testing --- one presumes it was not in the cars that Rohrl drove around the North Ring. I suggest we make noise with our dealers and get a free installation of the new bushings. The last car that felt like this was a 1929 Antique Dodge I drove, and the lurch was as the body settled on the rubber bushing/bump-stop.

    Mildly outrageous!

    KiwiCanuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Who knows, maybe Porsche will offer a fix

    If I were in your shoes, I would talk to my dealer, find this Olaf person meantioned in the Excellence article, and see if something can't be worked out.

    I agree Porsche should fix it--but it may take some time and I wouldn't expect some type of mass recall type fix. It seems to me the first step is to take your car in under warranty with the article in hand and ask whether they can do Olaf's fix or have another solution.

    My second choice would be to have it fixed at a suspension shop. At the worst, if one knew Olaf's fix, how much would it cost to have a suspension shop do it? If I had your car, I'd do what it takes to have it fixed, even paying for it as a last resort. Life's too short to have a car that's making you as miserable as you appear to be over something that evidently can be fixed.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Kiwi, maybe you should slap a lawsuit on the major German and USA car magazines for willful errors of ommission. You bought their articles, trusted the claimed accuracy of their reviews and acted upon them good faith. Actually, taking them to court is a stretch, but you get my point....

    How could Rohrl NOT have noticed the 05 PASM wobbly's, why wasnt he candid about it, and also why was it never mentioned in any of the Sport Auto tests of a 05 PASM 997?????

    When Rohrl was questioned about it by the testers from Excellence who noticed it on the C4S, he just shagged them off with "I'll get back to you about that." Mmmmmmm. Good answer Walter!

    It creates suspicion about the Rohrl-Saurma connection and the "Sport Auto" tests. Can they really be TOTALLY 100% neutral testers? A few times lifting off the throttle at opportune moments and voila! The Ferrari is slower than the Porsche in the big comparison test. Amazing! LOL. Germany AG is victorious again! What a suprise!

    Rohrl I expect to say what he must, or must not say, as his paycheck comes from Porsche. But Saurma is not Von Saint Nurburgring. For someone with his skill level to not have mentioned the 05 PASM foibles was just playing loose with the truth by omission of negative information. So his credibility as a professional fair evaluator and tester
    is suspect.

    I dont trust any of those guys to be 100% unbiased. Its only human nature to drive best what you are used to the most. But to ommit information is as bad as fabricating it.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Sounds to me like the "fix" would take 1/2 hour with your car on jack stands. Perfect DIY...

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PAS

    Sorry, my english is not that good, so, can anyone explain to me what the problem might be?
    I don't understand what "lurch" and "bushings" mean.
    Thx

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    There will be thousands of such afflicted 997s, many of them IN THIS WEB SITE!

    I would not do any of those things until Porsche clarifies the matter --- e.g.precisely what bushings would you use and where are they?

    It is not THAT bad ----- otherwise it would be the main topic in this part of the site?! Does this mean that the 997 owners on this site have not noticed it yet?

    I repeat---- every 997 thet Excellence tested, in NA and Europe had the problem---

    Kiwi Canuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Hello beltar,

    And what bushings would you use, and where would you get them?

    You must be joking ----

    KiwiCanuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PAS

    Hello beltar,

    And what bushings would you use, and where would you get them?

    You must be joking ----

    KiwiCanuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PAS

    The C4S is a 2006 model; what puzzled me is how Excellence mag has dismissed the demon lateral shift as apparently having been exorcised for 2006 models based upon the C2S X51 road test, when only a couple of months prior the same magazine wrote that 2006 C4S exhibited the same bothersome lateral/rear bushing behavior.

    If anyone attempts this mythical 90-degree rotation of bushings, give us a live web-cam feed or something..
    hell, sign me up for pay-per-view!

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    KiwiCanuck said:
    There will be thousands of such afflicted 997s, many of them IN THIS WEB SITE!

    I would not do any of those things until Porsche clarifies the matter --- e.g.precisely what bushings would you use and where are they?

    It is not THAT bad ----- otherwise it would be the main topic in this part of the site?! Does this mean that the 997 owners on this site have not noticed it yet?

    I repeat---- every 997 thet Excellence tested, in NA and Europe had the problem---

    Kiwi Canuck



    I have a 2006 997S and I think the problem is still there. I experienced it this evening. Frankly, I'm not a big fan of the PASM. I would have liked to see the Sport setting feel more like the 996.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Im not pimpin for TechArt, but they have a suspension kit coming out for cars with PASM. It also allows you to also control the ride height.

    It maybe the only solution for USA market cars with PASM to get handling nearly like, or maybe better than, the ROW sports suspension option.

    Apparently, different factory offered suspensions produce different crash safety results. So each one offered by a manufacturer must be Federally tested and certified. File enough complaints with NTSB and maybe Porsche will listen
    and offer a fix for the PASM wobbles.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PAS

    Damian said:

    If anyone attempts this mythical 90-degree rotation of bushings, give us a live web-cam feed or something..

    I think that could be a very inappropriate thing to do. If the bushing is designed NOT to be symmetrical in firmness, then why would one want a softer bushing in the forward-backward direction?

    Does any one have access to the part numbers of the bushings (which ones?) to see if they really did change in 2005-2006?

    KiwiCanuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    KiwiCanuck said:
    Hello beltar,

    And what bushings would you use, and where would you get them?

    You must be joking ----

    KiwiCanuck



    Sorry KiwiCanuck, i'm not joking...
    I just don't know the meaning of those words, i'm flemishspeaking and i presume, you won't understand all words in my language neither.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Alright, I'll throw myself to the lions...in hopes of shedding more light on the Excellence view on PASM and 997s.

    First, Ian Kuah's European long-lead drive in the 997 C4 happened quite a while before I tested the 2006 Club Coupe in Georgia -- many months likely separate the build dates of the C4s on that launch and the 06 CC I drove.

    Second, it's important to read the WHOLE article -- it notes that our time with the Club Coupe was limited and that we want to spend more time in 2006 997s with PASM to confirm our suspicion that the rear-end lurch has been resolved. As RC has noted so rightly in the past, a day is NOT the best way to get the full measure of a car. I'm still waiting for a 2006 test car to come through for our usual full week of testing -- but that Club Coupe handled superbly where other PASM 997s have not impressed me.

    That said, the issue we are dealing with here is a VERY MINOR one -- one that I suspect at least half of the people who would go to the dealer for a fix would not be able to detect on their own.

    Excellence isn't alone in its criticism of PASM-equipped early 997s, as Autocar has said much the same. But none of the other big mags -- at least that I have read -- have noticed (or chosen to spill any ink on this). Moreover, I was intrigued to read GT's take on the European Sport suspension vs. PASM some months ago. They felt that only REALLY sensitive, hardcore drivers would be happier with the non-PASM Sport suspension. An interesting point -- and they may be "right."

    We may also be "TOO" sensitive. We didn't like the 996 3.6 because Porsche dumbed down the handling slightly with 285-mm rear tires. We preferred the 3.4 cars, but only saw one other magazine who noted the difference -- Evo.

    We'll always lean towards a more sporting suspension setup -- so long as it's still this side of punishing. Firm yes, harsh no. The reason we've raised the point about 997s and PASM time and again is that -- though minor (!!!!) -- we don't feel ANY degradation in 911 handling since the advances made by the 996 series cars is acceptable. The base 997 is every bit as sweet as the 996 3.4 was, probably sweeter.

    For the 997, we believe Porsche chose to err a bit too far on the side of comfort -- and PASM-equipped 997s ride very well indeed (in the Normal setting). For most of their clientele these days, that is probably the more important goal. Much of our readership, however, probably has a different set of values...

    Excellence sees Porsches as sports cars first and foremost -- so they need to live up to that billing. In our view, Porsche hasn't made a lot of missteps in handling dynamics lately -- though the compromise it chose for the 997 with PASM didn't sit well with US -- so we said so.

    This is OUR editorial view -- it doesn't mean Porsche IS wrong. It just means WE think Porsche made the wrong choice on a "minor" issue. I don't know how to make that grounds for a lawsuit or a recall.

    IF the bushings were updated and I owned a 997S, I would strongly consider the update -- much as I would in the case of so many factory updates for 911s, 928s, 968s, 986s, etc. over the past 30 years.... Like Porsche has done so many times in the past, I suspect any new bushing simply supercedes the one that previously used the same part number.

    Finally, the latest from Manthey is that he's using a new bushing in the rear end to "fix" (perhaps "change" is a better word?) PASM for his customers.

    I hope this info is helpful -- as it's offered in that spirit.

    Happy Holidays,

    pete stout

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Oh, and about Walter Rohrl and the "let me get back to you..."

    That was Georg Wahl who is in charge of suspension development. He's a GREAT guy, and over drinks I asked him how they could have missed something like this -- and he said that sometimes when you are so deep into a project, looking for and developing certain things, you can miss something a person from the "outside" doesn't. Still, we had our doubts that we would have found something the wizards at Weissach missed, we figure they knew the compromise and made it anyway. We just called them on it.

    He took a subscription to the magazine out and sent a calendar and a nice Christmas card the last two years -- he's a real-deal enthusisast that's not consumed with an ego. It's nice to know there are some who are still truly committed to making the cars better within Weissach....

    BTW, privately, Rohrl has been clear on his suspension preferences. And all I will say about that is that they are a lot like ours...

    pete

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    excmag said:
    Alright, I'll throw myself to the lions...
    pete stout



    Hi Mr. Editor,
    please stay with the lions I think it's great (and maybe unique) that a professional automag editor shares his views with a forum of car nuts (RC: maybe this is the first time ever ?). Thanx a lot. BTW: your profile shows that you are driving a Boxster - any comments on Boxster + PASM (just kidding)

    Happy Holidays from Porsche-Country

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    excmag said:
    Oh, and about Walter Rohrl and the "let me get back to you..."

    That was Georg Wahl who is in charge of suspension development. He's a GREAT guy, and over drinks I asked him how they could have missed something like this -- and he said that sometimes when you are so deep into a project, looking for and developing certain things, you can miss something a person from the "outside" doesn't. Still, we had our doubts that we would have found something the wizards at Weissach missed, we figure they knew the compromise and made it anyway. We just called them on it.

    He took a subscription to the magazine out and sent a calendar and a nice Christmas card the last two years -- he's a real-deal enthusisast that's not consumed with an ego. It's nice to know there are some who are still truly committed to making the cars better within Weissach....

    BTW, privately, Rohrl has been clear on his suspension preferences. And all I will say about that is that they are a lot like ours...

    pete



    I agree with Jeck, above...
    Pete, hats off to you for your high-quality product and good faith contribution in the last two posts.

    I'd love to see Excellence magazine perhaps render a mechanical drawing (or photos) of these particular bushings and their orientation within the rear suspension.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    excmag said:
    As RC has noted so rightly in the past, a day is NOT the best way to get the full measure of a car. I'm still waiting for a 2006 test car to come through for our usual full week of testing -- but that Club Coupe handled superbly where other PASM 997s have not impressed me.




    I look forward to your longer report--the reason why I brought this up was because your test report on the Club Coupe is some confirmation that I (owner of Club Coupe No. 2) and Aerosmith (has an 06 997 S with X51 delivered perhaps 3 weeks ahead of me) have said. We haven't experienced the issue, either.

    Nice article, btw. Added it to my burgeoning Club Coupe history file

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    beltar said:
    Quote:
    KiwiCanuck said:
    Hello beltar,

    And what bushings would you use, and where would you get them?

    You must be joking ----

    KiwiCanuck



    Sorry KiwiCanuck, i'm not joking...
    I just don't know the meaning of those words, i'm flemishspeaking and i presume, you won't understand all words in my language neither.



    Beltar,

    Since KiwiCanuck doesn't seem to be around to respond to your post, here's my 2 cents worth: I think he was really addressing himself to Grant's post, but he not only used your name by mistake but also misunderstood the content of Grant's message.

    The bushings referred to are metal / rubber bearings, ("Lager" in German - may help you identify the Flemish word?). The "Silentbloc" brand name might also help.

    fritz (in "Promotion of World Peace" mode, for a change)

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    The 987 chassis, for whatever reason be it the longer wheelbase or mid-engine and/or the tuning to work with that setup, has none of the PASM issues that we've experienced in the rear-engined/SWB 997.

    Then again, maybe the PASM 997 issues have nothing to do with the above -- maybe it was just the bushing choice as the 06 CC drive implied. Still too soon to be SURE, though.

    So far we like every 987 chassis/wheel/tire combo we've tried EXCEPT non-PASM with the 19s -- the chassis tuning for the heavy wheels didn't seen to work so well. Some readers say the lighter Carrera Classics help, but I cannot verify this.

    But then, PASM or no, I'd get 18s on the Boxster every time...

    And so would Walter!

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Welcome and thanks Editor Stout,

    Your input was timely and appropriate on the 'sway/shift ----bushings' issue. I recognized the prose immediately. You are a unique person in the field -----

    I agree with the other responses to your several inputs, and would welcome diagrams, names of, news of solutions found by various Porsche-specialists ---- in upcoming articles.

    It is mildly discouraging to hear that new PAG bushings may appear in 'stock' without any number change in the 'part inventory'. It is also interesting that it took quite a lot of urging and nudging on my part to have anyone, on even this fine web, to find and ackowledge the existance of this 'minor' foible. I guess as a new Porsche disciple I was less ready to accept the perfection of the 997-PASM beauty. And it does show that the driving habits of even 997 lovers may be/are remarkably sedate/unquestioning at times. Interesting ----------------------

    Merry Christmas to all ----- oH! and glance at my thread on driving the Carrera-PASM-18in on ice and snow. Very nice at -20C ------ very nice.

    Cheers

    KiwiCanuck

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Thanks for the posts Pete from this new 06 C4 Cab owner and recent subscriber to your fine magazine.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    excmag said:
    The 987 chassis, for whatever reason be it the longer wheelbase or mid-engine and/or the tuning to work with that setup, has none of the PASM issues that we've experienced in the rear-engined/SWB 997.

    So far we like every 987 chassis/wheel/tire combo we've tried EXCEPT non-PASM with the 19s -- the chassis tuning for the heavy wheels didn't seen to work so well. Some readers say the lighter Carrera Classics help, but I cannot verify this.

    But then, PASM or no, I'd get 18s on the Boxster every time...

    And so would Walter!



    Pete, thank you for helping a future 987 S owner with making his choice (BTW: is your mag available in Germany ?)

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    Porsche-Jeck said:
    (BTW: is your mag available in Germany ?)



    Go to http://www.excellence-mag.com/subscribe.html

    Foreign subscriptions are available for $36.00 USD per year.

    Phil

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Thanks for the plug!

    Believe it or not, Germany is the toughest distribution market, right after the U.K. Getting the magazine on newsstands from tiny countries in the Middle East to tiny towns in the Netherlands to all over Asia is easy.

    Germany is not. But I have seen it in some airports there. Otherwise, I've never seen it -- and readers tell me it is hard to find, too.

    pete

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    KiwiCanuck said:
    It is mildly discouraging to hear that new PAG bushings may appear in 'stock' without any number change in the 'part inventory'.



    I agree, but this is a very common practice and makes sense, actually. When the coolant tank in my Boxster failed (at 60,000 miles!), it was replaced by the latest part. I understand Porsche has altered this part 2-3 times. Not everyone will hear about the new part, however, so a few people/mechanics might order from the number on the failed one and miss the new item. Ditto for RMSs, strut bearings, and so much else.

    What makes it predictably unpredictable is that some updated parts DO get new numbers...

    BTW, don't take TOO much meaning from my Boxster and 914 ownership. I've had the 914 since I was 15 so I'm kinda stuck with it now. Personally, I like mid-engined Porsches a lot -- with the 914, 986/987, and C-GT chassis -- as my favorite Porsche platforms. That said, I have grown to REALLY like 911s and the traction they provide out of turns -- plus I like the challenge of getting the front end to stick as well as the 911's unique handling/driving CHARACTER. I've owned an early 911 in the past and probably will get a modern one in the future -- mainly for the rear seats.

    Now, which magazine said no one cares about the back seats in a 911?

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Frankly, I still have a tough time with the sway/lurch issue. Some random thoughts:

    1. My GT3 had *way* more handling anomalies than my 997S, yet nobody hammers the GT3 like this lurch issue. GT3s are precise and will carve on the track, but in real world conditions (crowned roads, potholes, bumps, etc) it can be a PITA to drive. Constant steering corrections, non-linear responses (which I blame on the extreme lowering of car w/o revising suspension geometry to address bumpsteer issues; GT3s need the RS suspension IMHO). It also suffers from lots of rear end lurching and shifting (especially under transition, e.g., turn in), much more noticable than on the S. So, I put this 997S 'lurch' issue in persective against other porsches I've owned, and it is VERY minor!

    2. Whatever rear shift there is, is minor and easily ignored. Once the S takes a set, it has iron fisted grip and is easily coaxed into gentle slides in normal, sport, and PSM off modes. It's *very* predictible in its handling. I'd say at least as predictable as my GT3 once loaded up in a corner, and *more* predictable in transition. Very accurate steering and unbelievable path accuracy.

    3. I continue to have doubts that the root cause is a bushing issue. Given the dynamic nature of the 'shift' under steady state conditions (as reported by Excellence), I'm thinking its a software issue, and issue with the initial programming of PASM where in certain conditions the damping adjustments aren't quick enough and/or refined enough to keep the back end in it's place.

    4. I'm probably more forgiving on this issue than others since I've driven many 'problem' cars in the past and have learned to drive around handling issues on the track.

    Anyway, food for thought from an S owner who thinks this is really much ado about nothing.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    frayed said:3. I continue to have doubts that the root cause is a bushing issue. Given the dynamic nature of the 'shift' under steady state conditions (as reported by Excellence), I'm thinking its a software issue, and issue with the initial programming of PASM where in certain conditions the damping adjustments aren't quick enough and/or refined enough to keep the back end in it's place.


    This is my opinion also, or that the software misinterprets the sensor readings into conflicting damper requirements under certain circumstances. Who knows! If that is the case, perhaps a software update would make things better. Though knowing Porsche, that probably wouldn't be posible to retrofit, like the PCM MP3.

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Quote:
    excmag said:
    BTW, don't take TOO much meaning from my Boxster and 914 ownership. I've had the 914 since I was 15 so I'm kinda stuck with it now.



    Ain't life tough!

    Re: Rear bushings -- sway/lurch/body-movement with 2005 PASM

    Good thoughts 'frayed',

    Fair enough ------ I am not going to even 'think' about this anymore. In my normal, enthusisatic driving it is very very minor. I am so rarely on a bit of road good enough to notice 'it' ------

    And most drivers and road testers don't detect 'it' either. The fact that 'it' does not affect the overall handling of the car (i.e. not affecting the stability or cornering-limiting-speeds in extremis), as you so usefully state, also suggests a minor minor 'effect'. And my thread sat there for a week or so, and NO ONE even mentioned 'it'.

    Cheers

    KiwiCanuck

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 4/17/24 7:16 AM
    GnilM
    777363 1798
    Porsche Sticky Welcome to Rennteam: Cars and Coffee... (photos) 4/7/24 11:48 AM
    Boxster Coupe GTS
    441743 565
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Cayman GT4 RS (2021) 5/12/23 12:11 PM
    W8MM
    262798 288
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS - 2022 3/12/24 8:28 AM
    DJM48
    260982 323
    Porsche Sticky The new Macan: the first all-electric SUV from Porsche 1/30/24 9:18 AM
    RCA
    85255 45
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Taycan 2024 Facelift 3/15/24 1:23 PM
    CGX car nut
    5588 50
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 2/1/24 7:01 PM
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    880669 1364
    Porsche 992 GT3 7/23/23 7:01 PM
    Grant
    816013 3868
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 2/10/24 4:43 PM
    nberry
    390951 1526
    Porsche GT4RS 4/21/24 11:50 AM
    mcdelaug
    390064 1454
    Others Tesla 2 the new thread 12/13/23 2:48 PM
    CGX car nut
    372230 2401
    Porsche Donor vehicle for Singer Vehicle Design 7/3/23 12:30 PM
    Porker
    368938 797
    Porsche Red Nipples 991.2 GT3 Touring on tour 4/11/24 12:32 PM
    Ferdie
    289184 668
    Porsche Collected my 997 GTS today 10/19/23 7:06 PM
    CGX car nut
     
     
     
     
     
    261310 812
    Lambo Huracán EVO STO 7/30/23 6:59 PM
    mcdelaug
    240183 346
    Lotus Lotus Emira 6/25/23 2:53 PM
    Enmanuel
    230421 101
    Others Corvette C8 10/16/23 3:24 PM
    Enmanuel
    221198 488
    Others Gordon Murray - T.50 11/22/23 10:27 AM
    mcdelaug
    169262 387
    Porsche Back to basics - 996 GT3 RS 6/11/23 5:13 PM
    CGX car nut
    141036 144
    BMW M 2024 BMW M3 CS Official Now 12/29/23 9:04 AM
    RCA
    117510 303
    Motor Sp. 2023 Formula One 12/19/23 5:38 AM
    WhoopsyM
    108604 685
    Porsche 2022 992 Safari Model 3/7/24 4:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    84170 239
    AMG Mercedes-Benz W124 500E aka Porsche typ 2758 2/23/24 10:03 PM
    blueflame
    75073 297
    Porsche 992 GT3 RS 3/3/24 7:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    53653 314
    Motor Sp. Porsche 963 3/16/24 9:27 PM
    WhoopsyM
    25051 237
    Ferrari Ferrari 296 GTB (830PS, Hybrid V6) 1/21/24 4:29 PM
    GT-Boy
    21170 103
    BMW M 2022 BMW M5 CS 4/8/24 1:43 PM
    Ferdie
    19493 140
    AMG G63 sold out 9/15/23 7:38 PM
    Nico997
    16585 120
    AMG [2022] Mercedes-AMG SL 4/23/24 1:24 PM
    RCA
    13712 225
    Motor Sp. 24-Hour race Nürburgring 2018 5/25/23 10:42 PM
    Grant
    11244 55
    126 items found, displaying 1 to 30.