Quote:
CF said:
480-490 HP seems to be the final number.
But what about the torque?
To me this is even more interesting than high HP numbers.
With the new technology at hand I believe around 710-740 Nm should be possible.
1400 RPM-640 Nm
1900 RPM-5700 RPM - 710-740 Nm
Fuel consumtion 10% lower than previous model 996 Turbo.
Would this satisfy your needs?
Here is another way of looking at the 911 torque numbers, from the 996TTS to the 997NAC2, to the 997NAC2S, then to CF's putative #'s for the 997TT torque (converted to lb-ft) at 1,900rpm and max. at listed lowest rpm:
996TTS:
310@1,900
457@3,500
997NAC2:
220@1,900
273@4,250
997NAC2S:
235@1,900
295@4,600
997TT based on CF's torque #'s in NM (converted to lb-ft based on the formula: 1 lb-ft = 1.355818 Nm or 1 Nm = 0.73756):
710(524)@1,900
740(546)@<3,500
Notice the 997TT putatuve torque #'s extrapolated from CF's #'s are much greater than the 996TTS figures (at 1,900rpm's and peak at listed lowest rpm's):
310 to 457(3,500) for 996TTS
524 to 546(?<3,500) for 997TT.
And note down at 1,400rpm, torque from 996TTS to 997TT goes from 185 to 472(
)lb-ft with also a big jump at 1,900 from 310 to 524. Talk about minimal turbo lag!
Assuming only a 100pound weight gain from 996TTS to 997TT, for weights of 3,075/3,131/3,505/3,605 for 997C2/997C2S/996TTS/997TT, then here are some torque-to-weight ratios expressed as weight in lb versus torque in lb-ft at 1,900rpm/and at max. torque:
996TTS: 11.3/7.7
997C2: 14.0/11.3
997C2S: 13.3/10.6
997TT: 6.7/6.6
For these weight-to-torque ratios, the lower the #, the relatively more power for torque. Note that the #'s for the 997TT are lower than all others by a factor of half or more (only the 996TTS peak torque approaches that for the 997TT), so if the VTG's can produce progdigious HP and subsequent torque for rotating the transaxle, especially at lower rpm's as dramatically displayed above, then the 997TT should be a performance beast.