Quote:
Almost everyone of them adore Porsches and i know very well that they don't just drive them for three hours. Press cars are available for much longer periods of time, any magazine has the chance to drive them again and again, test them on tracks and comparison tests.
My bad, I didn't know that, you're right actually, I do remember comparo tests where they take, say three cars, to France or else and drive the hell our of them.
But it's still not as good as a review from an owner, or no, hang on, it's not better, it's different.
One should be able to get some perspective on press articles.
It's like all these articles on 360 vs 996 Turbo and all the future ones on 430 vs 997 Turbo.
Sure, it's exciting, sure we'll all read them, but we all know that these two cars are very different in character.
Quote:
Ferrari Modena does have better front bite and it's more eager during turn in- Porsche has better traction durnig exit. No one is perfect.
Absolutely. One is faster getting into a corner, the other one is faster getting out.
Careful though, mid engined cars are much trickier to drive on the limit, it is difficult to "feel" what the car tells you, and that goes for the Boxster too.
A 911 with its higher polar moment of inertia, you can instantly feel what the car is doing and apply counter steer more progressively.
I experienced the same with a Maserati Gransport the other day under the rain on a track, same as the 911 but the weight majority is in the front this time and it's very easy to slide that car, well, in the wet at least!
Quote:
They are both great cars but i think that if there were no rear seats and engine moved a little forward, Porsche would be even better on THAT point.
Yes and no. it is a Caymen then. we'll see in the future.
For me a 911 is two things:
Rear engine (in the concept, as I wrote before, it's not really rear engined anymore)
Flat 6.