http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXHZLMjmBRQ

10:50 So the suspension is not identical to the GT3RS? "No! No!" "We have eliminated most of the elastic kinematic joints"

11:20 Is it rose jointed? "Ya! Ya!"

11:48 "we could cut down this (reaction) time by changing to rose joints"

12:02 Preuninger "we have to get rid of all the rubber"

A careful review of PET, the Porsche internal part cataloging system shows only two differences (T-W-O) between GT3RS and GT2RS in ENTIRE front and rear suspension. The rear Track Rod (also known as a Toe-Control arm) and the rear wishbone (known as Lower Control Arm).

All other, "elastic kinematic" filled suspension parts are identical and shared between the two cars.

Watch the video, listen to the Porsche representatives own words, and tell me if it was at best a severe mis-representation or at worst a bald-faced lie?

Tell me again the price of the car? It certainly is not out of line to ask why the car is not outfitted as represented?  And why have the magazine reviewers not looked into this? Too busy with lurid tail-out slides to do any factual investigation?

Enthusiasts pay very good money to outfit cars with aftermarket suspension pieces. Solid pieces without "elastic kinematic" pieces in them. Porsche represented this car as already having those pieces but it seems to not be the truth? What is the explanation?