|
997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
STRADALE |
Jun 16, 2005 8:02:04 PM |
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Grant |
Jun 16, 2005 8:28:16 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Texas911 |
Jun 16, 2005 8:38:17 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Futch |
Jun 16, 2005 9:06:28 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Grant |
Jun 16, 2005 9:15:41 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Futch |
Jun 16, 2005 11:26:23 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
SrfCity |
Jun 17, 2005 12:27:43 AM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
SoCal Alan |
Jun 17, 2005 1:50:39 AM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Moogle |
Jun 17, 2005 2:18:04 AM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
STRADALE |
Jun 17, 2005 2:51:38 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
964C2 |
Jun 17, 2005 4:06:49 PM |
|
Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
MMD |
Jun 17, 2005 5:01:20 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
jboyko |
Jun 17, 2005 7:04:44 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
PS CA |
Jun 17, 2005 7:28:03 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
69bossnine |
Jun 17, 2005 8:12:12 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
SVNSVN |
Jun 17, 2005 8:44:20 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
br d |
Jun 17, 2005 9:22:52 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
SoCal Alan |
Jun 18, 2005 2:42:56 AM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
Ferdie |
Jun 18, 2005 4:23:08 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
SoCal Alan |
Jun 18, 2005 4:35:08 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
STRADALE |
Jun 19, 2005 9:57:15 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
69bossnine |
Jun 20, 2005 1:55:08 PM |
|
Re: Why 3.9 is hard to duplicate:
|
STRADALE |
Jun 19, 2005 9:56:07 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
STRADALE |
Jun 19, 2005 9:51:22 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
watt |
Jun 21, 2005 5:42:10 PM |
|
Re: 997 S - Zero to 60 mph in 3.9 sec
|
Fred 993C4S |
Jun 16, 2005 9:19:21 PM |
Close
Community
and
