Re: Corvette Blue Devil Announcement
And there is nowhere else to go. The next best thing is the M3, but Bangle hit it with his trademark fat ugly stick.
Feb 23, 2007 11:52:15 PM
Quote:
Ron (Houston) said:Quote:
Mike S said:
!!! I wish they brought Corvette's here!
I'm surprised that chevy doesn't go SA .
This could be a good sign though.
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/23/down-under-gets-first-ever-wrong-hand-drive-z06/
Feb 24, 2007 12:47:42 AM
Quote:
Mike S said:Quote:
Ron (Houston) said:Quote:
Mike S said:
!!! I wish they brought Corvette's here!
I'm surprised that chevy doesn't go SA .
This could be a good sign though.
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/23/down-under-gets-first-ever-wrong-hand-drive-z06/
We have Chevy (Dodge and Cadillac have recently been introduced to the market as well). Just not the Corvettes and Vipers.
How ever I have seen some RHD Dodge RAM SRT-10's driving around. Don't know if the RHD was aftermarket though.
Quote:
911fan said:
I wish they didnt supercharge the engine. Couldnt they have raised it to 650 hp with other mods?
Feb 24, 2007 6:35:44 AM
Quote:
Turbo Al said:
To me, Porsche is still about only one car-the 911Turbo, the only rear-engined production car with supercar potential, and I even see its marketing into oblivion.
Ironically, while the Boxster and Cayenne saved the company, and the Panamera is supposed to thrust it further forward, with the exception of the Panamera (and I'm still hesitant on this one given my concenrs about performance, especially given Porsche's recent history with their line-up), I have no attraction for any other Porsche vehicles-not even the 911Carrera.
And if Audi or others can make sick-fast 4-door sedans with or without aftermarket tweaks, that Panamera for me is highly tentative.
Feb 24, 2007 7:30:39 AM
Quote:
bondmid003 said:
This isn't an insult but you have to realize that GM is alot bigger of an entity than Porsche and its to be expected that they go through ups and downs. Porsche is 'printing money' because it fills its niche well and thats produce sports cars. GM is losing money in my opinion because it is spread so thin across the globe
Feb 24, 2007 10:40:44 PM
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
bondmid003 said:
This isn't an insult but you have to realize that GM is alot bigger of an entity than Porsche and its to be expected that they go through ups and downs. Porsche is 'printing money' because it fills its niche well and thats produce sports cars. GM is losing money in my opinion because it is spread so thin across the globe
Have you compared the market value of Porsche and GM recently? Bigger is not better in this case, I am afraid...
Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
For your friends who are bored with their 911s, I suggest its for reasons other than styling. If they could access their cars performance on a daily basis they would know and appreciate what they bought. A few track days a year or a few runs up to 120mph on a on ramp is not the same as being able to hit 150mph without fear of jailtime.
So, I think its more of a problem with your friends mentality. They are greedy. They want to own a iconic car, but being unable to exercise it, they feel stumped and flail about wanting something else. Maybe they are rich and useless, self indulgent people. Maybe they should not own a car engineered for 180mph and should get something thats less expensive and donate the price difference to people who just need a car period.
Feb 26, 2007 4:39:14 PM
Mar 2, 2007 7:07:47 PM
Quote:
95jersey said:
I saw this article in Motor Trend.
"Jim Queen, GM's VP of global product development, has told Motor Trend more about how GM's international car lines will continue to get closer."
"Queen says the C7 Vette will stick with a naturally aspirated V-8 (at least for the base model) and RWD (not AWD). But power will climb by another significant increment, likely up to around 700 horsepower for the top end model, although Queen would give no specific number. 'We're working hard to get that power onto the pavement,' Queen said, mentioning that weight and weight distribution are the keys."
http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2007/112_0703_gm_global_product/
That is nuts, wonder if the Blue Devil is actually the 7th generation? But 700HP?!?! in a 2900lbs car. With such light weight, that may topple the Bugatti.
Quote:
95jersey said:
That is nuts, wonder if the Blue Devil is actually the 7th generation? But 700HP?!?! in a 2900lbs car. With such light weight, that may topple the Bugatti.
Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
Al, the SS is destined for collections and tracks. It will be a very low volume cash cow. I doubt if the "people" you meant will even be able to afford the second sticker that dealers will put on them.
In general, new Corvette buyer demographics are way higher in income than most realize. The car is now cross owned with 997TT and F430 buyers. Thats a new development for Chevy and the Z06 made that happen.
Close to you is someone who owns a modified 700hp Z06.I don't think you would scoff at his bank account or his driving skills. His name is Mario Andretti.
Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
MK, the Corvette is not a disaster. The technology you call "cheap" happens to work very well. Elegeant interior?
No. But does a $46,000 400hp base model Porsche even exist? No.
Porsches over reliance on technology bandaids is a disgrace and shows how desperate they are to keep forcing their square pegs into round holes. PASM, Sport Chrono, etc are just bandages to hide the bleeding wounds of over cooked engineering and bait to attract customers with more wishes than sense. Its technology overkill, unreliable, not robust and doomed to make resale values sink even deeper due to the cost of repairs.
That said. A 700hp Corvette without AWD will be useless except for sunny days or the track. But that is its market!
Its not as if the car will be marketed to take the place of AWD Passat TDI's. So don't worry, they won't be taking up floor space at your local VW dealer anytime soon.
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
MK, the Corvette is not a disaster. The technology you call "cheap" happens to work very well. Elegeant interior?
No. But does a $46,000 400hp base model Porsche even exist? No.
Porsches over reliance on technology bandaids is a disgrace and shows how desperate they are to keep forcing their square pegs into round holes. PASM, Sport Chrono, etc are just bandages to hide the bleeding wounds of over cooked engineering and bait to attract customers with more wishes than sense. Its technology overkill, unreliable, not robust and doomed to make resale values sink even deeper due to the cost of repairs.
That said. A 700hp Corvette without AWD will be useless except for sunny days or the track. But that is its market!
Its not as if the car will be marketed to take the place of AWD Passat TDI's. So don't worry, they won't be taking up floor space at your local VW dealer anytime soon.
OK, my previous post might have been a little bit harsh
However: 700hp in a RWD car, without ESP, AWD etc... If I understood correctly, those 700hp will also involve turbo charging which cannot be expected to make the car easier to drive... If you ask me, it is the wrong way to offer 700hp the cheapest way possible (basically, that's the Corvette strategy).
High-performance sports cars require intense know-how and expertise. GM does not have this expertise. This is one of the major reasons why I would neither buy the Z06 or the Blue Devil for intense use on German Autobahns. I would not feel safe as I don't have the confidence that the people who designed and built the car have sufficient expertise in the high-end sportscar segment.
I prefer to pay more. And to get a top-of-the-league product
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
MK, the Corvette is not a disaster. The technology you call "cheap" happens to work very well. Elegeant interior?
No. But does a $46,000 400hp base model Porsche even exist? No.
Porsches over reliance on technology bandaids is a disgrace and shows how desperate they are to keep forcing their square pegs into round holes. PASM, Sport Chrono, etc are just bandages to hide the bleeding wounds of over cooked engineering and bait to attract customers with more wishes than sense. Its technology overkill, unreliable, not robust and doomed to make resale values sink even deeper due to the cost of repairs.
That said. A 700hp Corvette without AWD will be useless except for sunny days or the track. But that is its market!
Its not as if the car will be marketed to take the place of AWD Passat TDI's. So don't worry, they won't be taking up floor space at your local VW dealer anytime soon.
OK, my previous post might have been a little bit harsh
However: 700hp in a RWD car, without ESP, AWD etc... If I understood correctly, those 700hp will also involve turbo charging which cannot be expected to make the car easier to drive... If you ask me, it is the wrong way to offer 700hp the cheapest way possible (basically, that's the Corvette strategy).
High-performance sports cars require intense know-how and expertise. GM does not have this expertise. This is one of the major reasons why I would neither buy the Z06 or the Blue Devil for intense use on German Autobahns. I would not feel safe as I don't have the confidence that the people who designed and built the car have sufficient expertise in the high-end sportscar segment.
I prefer to pay more. And to get a top-of-the-league product
Markus, when is your birthday? I would like to send you a flame retardant suit, as you'll most undoubtably need it .
In all seriousness, I think Chevy DOES have expertise (their stint at Le Mans has been quite impressive), but perhaps you're right about high-speed performance. And I definitely agree with you that the car will be next to useless on the street.
Quote:
MKSGR said:
Re. GM: The problem is that the staff of their racing team does not have much to do with their standard car business. At least I would guess so?
Quote:
MKSGR said:
Hmmmm... Ok, I will buy one
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
MK, the Corvette is not a disaster. The technology you call "cheap" happens to work very well. Elegeant interior?
No. But does a $46,000 400hp base model Porsche even exist? No.
Porsches over reliance on technology bandaids is a disgrace and shows how desperate they are to keep forcing their square pegs into round holes. PASM, Sport Chrono, etc are just bandages to hide the bleeding wounds of over cooked engineering and bait to attract customers with more wishes than sense. Its technology overkill, unreliable, not robust and doomed to make resale values sink even deeper due to the cost of repairs.
That said. A 700hp Corvette without AWD will be useless except for sunny days or the track. But that is its market!
Its not as if the car will be marketed to take the place of AWD Passat TDI's. So don't worry, they won't be taking up floor space at your local VW dealer anytime soon.
OK, my previous post might have been a little bit harsh
However: 700hp in a RWD car, without ESP, AWD etc... If I understood correctly, those 700hp will also involve turbo charging which cannot be expected to make the car easier to drive... If you ask me, it is the wrong way to offer 700hp the cheapest way possible (basically, that's the Corvette strategy).
High-performance sports cars require intense know-how and expertise. GM does not have this expertise. This is one of the major reasons why I would neither buy the Z06 or the Blue Devil for intense use on German Autobahns. I would not feel safe as I don't have the confidence that the people who designed and built the car have sufficient expertise in the high-end sportscar segment.
I prefer to pay more. And to get a top-of-the-league product