Jun 9, 2006 11:43:51 PM
- JimFlat6
- Rennteam VIP
- Loc: Cave , United States
- Posts: 8634, Gallery
- Registered on: Jul 25, 2004
- Reply to: Carlos from Spain
Jun 9, 2006 11:43:51 PM
Quote:hi nick,
nberry said:
Jeff, if its govenment mandate they could provide the car manufacturers with immunity against these type of lawsuits. There is precedent for this.
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
@MKW Your premise has one error. You assume that hazardous drivers have drivers licenses!
Here in California, LOTS of our drivers wouldn't be able to get a first driver's license anyway , as they entered our fair state " unofficially " from south of the border .
Jun 10, 2006 4:40:56 AM
Quote:
nberry said:
Jeff, if its govenment mandate they could provide the car manufacturers with immunity against these type of lawsuits. There is precedent for this.
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
Jun 10, 2006 5:15:28 AM
Quote:
SoCal Alan said:Quote:
nberry said:
Jeff, if its govenment mandate they could provide the car manufacturers with immunity against these type of lawsuits. There is precedent for this.
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
If we could save 43,000 lives a year in the U.S. by eliminating driving altogether, wouldn't it be worth it?
Jun 10, 2006 2:04:57 PM
Quote:
Carlos from Spain said:Quote:
nberry said:
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
This coming from someone who doesn't even flinch at the idea that in the year 2006, the maker of his his new $100k+ car w/ 500HP didn't feel like spending the R&D on side airbags (which are proven to save not one life but thousands), not even as an option... oh, the hipocresy...
Quote:
Crash said:
I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Jun 10, 2006 4:03:48 PM
Quote:
Carlos from Spain said:Quote:
nberry said:
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
This coming from someone who doesn't even flinch at the idea that in the year 2006, the maker of his his new $100k+ car w/ 500HP didn't feel like spending the R&D on side airbags (which are proven to save not one life but thousands), not even as an option... oh, the hipocresy...
Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
Crash said:
I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Uhh...I guess you haven't lived in big cities where " underpriviledged youth " walk up to your car at a stoplight or especially after a freeway off ramp , wipe your windshield w/o your permission a couple times with a muddy squeegie , then demand payment ( or your life ) for services rendered !
Jun 10, 2006 7:34:46 PM
Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
Carlos from Spain said:Quote:
nberry said:
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
This coming from someone who doesn't even flinch at the idea that in the year 2006, the maker of his his new $100k+ car w/ 500HP didn't feel like spending the R&D on side airbags (which are proven to save not one life but thousands), not even as an option... oh, the hipocresy...
Carlos my position is all manufacturers must comply including Ferrari.
The issue deals with risk/benefit. Outlawing driving will far outweigh the envitable accidents/injuries.
Jun 10, 2006 8:26:47 PM
Quote:
icon said:
i guess the boss changed his mind?:)
Jun 10, 2006 8:31:04 PM
Quote:
Carlos from Spain said:Quote:
nberry said:
BTW, assuming there wasn't any immunity, if the DE could save one life wouldn't it be worth it? Any argument by a car manufacturer about cost would not be received well by a jury.
This coming from someone who doesn't even flinch at the idea that in the year 2006, the maker of his his new $100k+ car w/ 500HP didn't feel like spending the R&D on side airbags (which are proven to save not one life but thousands), not even as an option... oh, the hipocresy...
Jun 10, 2006 8:46:02 PM
Jun 10, 2006 8:59:00 PM
Jun 10, 2006 9:07:23 PM
Quote:
Carlos from Spain said:Quote:
SciFrog said:
You have a good point, but technology is always introduced at a certain pace and not on all cars in the lineup for any manufacturers...
You'll find side airbags on an italian $15k Fiat punto...
Jun 10, 2006 9:08:17 PM
Quote:
SciFrog said:
This just proves my point, they needed to recertify the whole car everywhere in the world just for 06, they didn't bother cause they din't have to.
Jun 10, 2006 9:29:33 PM
Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
Crash said:
I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Uhh...I guess you haven't lived in big cities where " underpriviledged youth " walk up to your car at a stoplight or especially after a freeway off ramp , wipe your windshield w/o your permission a couple times with a muddy squeegie , then demand payment ( or your life ) for services rendered !
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
SciFrog said:
This just proves my point, they needed to recertify the whole car everywhere in the world just for 06, they didn't bother cause they din't have to.
They should've introduced the side airbags when the car came out. It came out in late 2003 if I'm not mistaken? A $20.000 VW Passat had side airbags as standard equipment in 1997. Ferrari have NO excuse.
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
@MKW Your premise has one error. You assume that hazardous drivers have drivers licenses!
Here in California, LOTS of our drivers wouldn't be able to get a first driver's license anyway , as they entered our fair state " unofficially " from south of the border .
Build a wall and throw them out. I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Oh, and once you throw them out, build a wall and post minutemen with .50 cals all over the southern border. Should make for some interesting news reports.
Quote:
vtrader said:Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
Crash said:
I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Uhh...I guess you haven't lived in big cities where " underpriviledged youth " walk up to your car at a stoplight or especially after a freeway off ramp , wipe your windshield w/o your permission a couple times with a muddy squeegie , then demand payment ( or your life ) for services rendered !
I have lived in the second largest US city all my life and have driven in all types of neighborhoods at all hours of the day and night with both German and Japanese cars and have never had "underpriviledged youth" demand anything. But then maybe it was my attitude or maybe I was not driving a turbo.
Quote:
vtrader said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKW said:Quote:
JimFlat6 said:
@MKW Your premise has one error. You assume that hazardous drivers have drivers licenses!
Here in California, LOTS of our drivers wouldn't be able to get a first driver's license anyway , as they entered our fair state " unofficially " from south of the border .
Build a wall and throw them out. I never understood how a person who came into the US illegally could call Americans ungrateful for not caring about their contribution. That's like me washing your car without you asking me and then demanding payment.
Oh, and once you throw them out, build a wall and post minutemen with .50 cals all over the southern border. Should make for some interesting news reports.
Where are the moderators? Why are we allowing politcal BS to be on this board? Comments from both MKW and Crash are inappropiate. In fact, I find them highly offensive. If they want to talk about illegal immigration in the US, then take it to a political board. I thought this board was about sports cars? Why does this BS about illegal immigration and the talks of .50 caliber bullets?/guns? allow to remain on this board?
I am sorry RC, Ron, Carlos, and any other moderator on this board, but this should not be on Rennteam at all.
Quote:
vtrader said:
I am sorry RC, Ron, Carlos, and any other moderator on this board, but this should not be on Rennteam at all.
Quote:
RC said:Quote:
vtrader said:
I am sorry RC, Ron, Carlos, and any other moderator on this board, but this should not be on Rennteam at all.
So you're not a big fan of "Mind of Mencia" (Comedy Central) right? This is actually one of my favorite comedy shows in US TV.
I don't think that politics can always been excluded from discussions but I actually don't see anything wrong with it. Well...maybe you're right...this is a car forum but sometimes you have to cut people a little bit of slack, especially when they discuss serious matters like the "aftermath" of Ben's tragic death.
I think it is really time for an off-topic forum, one which can be accessed (writing and READING) by logged in members only. We're working on it, promised.
Jun 11, 2006 5:02:50 AM
Quote:
vtrader said:Quote:
RC said:Quote:
vtrader said:
I am sorry RC, Ron, Carlos, and any other moderator on this board, but this should not be on Rennteam at all.
So you're not a big fan of "Mind of Mencia" (Comedy Central) right? This is actually one of my favorite comedy shows in US TV.
I don't think that politics can always been excluded from discussions but I actually don't see anything wrong with it. Well...maybe you're right...this is a car forum but sometimes you have to cut people a little bit of slack, especially when they discuss serious matters like the "aftermath" of Ben's tragic death.
I think it is really time for an off-topic forum, one which can be accessed (writing and READING) by logged in members only. We're working on it, promised.
Which is exactly my point RC. What does the talk of illegal immigration or I should say illegal Mexican immigration have to do with a thread on the Carrera GT lawsuit?
This is a very hot topic in Southern California where it is constantly being debated on the radio and it has gotten to be very ugly. And this has been a hot topic since the 1820s when illegal immigration caused Mexico to lose Texas.
RC, you said in previous posts that we are an international community of Porsche devotees which include Mexican nationals and Americans of Mexican descent. The comments are not appropriate for this forum and especially on a thread on Ben's death and the resulting lawsuit.
Jun 11, 2006 6:17:43 AM
Jun 11, 2006 7:06:31 AM
Quote:
SoCal Alan said:
Since this is a "hot topic", should we not talk about it?
I don't care if one is here illegally here from Mexico or Canada or where-ever. If laws are broken, prosecute, and serve time or pay fines. Whatever the law allows. But don't hide the discussion because it's a little too sensitive for you. About 90% of my friends and colleagues are pretty upset about the current situation. Some of these are from other countries who are now citizens, or are in the process of obtaining citizenship the legal way. They are extremely upset about how a large group of illegal immigrants are trying to get around the legal system to obtain citizenship.