Quote:
Bilal said:
Thanks![]()
Where does one start? The 0-300km/hr times are really disappointing for the Z06/M6 and SLR, I think the GT3 and Gallardo SL are about right.
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Bilal said:
Thanks
Where does one start? The 0-300km/hr times are really disappointing for the Z06/M6 and SLR, I think the GT3 and Gallardo SL are about right.
I was disappointed about the Gallardo time as well (although, 0-200 was still OK, 0-300 the car broke in...)![]()
Quote:
KresoF1 said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Bilal said:
Thanks
Where does one start? The 0-300km/hr times are really disappointing for the Z06/M6 and SLR, I think the GT3 and Gallardo SL are about right.
I was disappointed about the Gallardo time as well (although, 0-200 was still OK, 0-300 the car broke in...)![]()
Markus,
This high speed AMS test was done at Nardo. Last one was done on VW test track with very long real straight... That is the key difference...
Just compare this results with last year's results...
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Bilal said:
Thanks![]()
Where does one start? The 0-300km/hr times are really disappointing for the Z06/M6 and SLR, I think the GT3 and Gallardo SL are about right.
I was disappointed about the Gallardo time as well (although, 0-200 was still OK, 0-300 the car broke in...)![]()
Markus,
This high speed AMS test was done at Nardo. Last one was done on VW test track with very long real straight... That is the key difference...
Just compare this results with last year's results...
Youre theory is that accelearion times in Nardo are worse than those achieved on a long straight (like in ET), right![]()
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Bilal said:
Thanks
Where does one start? The 0-300km/hr times are really disappointing for the Z06/M6 and SLR, I think the GT3 and Gallardo SL are about right.
I was disappointed about the Gallardo time as well (although, 0-200 was still OK, 0-300 the car broke in...)![]()
Markus,
This high speed AMS test was done at Nardo. Last one was done on VW test track with very long real straight... That is the key difference...
Just compare this results with last year's results...
Youre theory is that accelearion times in Nardo are worse than those achieved on a long straight (like in ET), right![]()
Quote:
VGA18 said:
How do they aciheve 300kmh 16 second late with the Z06.
Last test is the BS of the year.
How Gallardo SL be slower than Gt3 at top speeds(200-300kmh)... And how GT3 faster than Turbo on topspeed!!!!1
I have mailed AMS Turkish editor a a few month ago(2-2.5 months) about a test of supercars in Istanbul and also about 15.0 second time of Gallardo test is bullshit and also about AMS tests are often bullshit. Said him i will be ready with my Gallardo to any test.
He said ""ok we are planning to arrange a super test like this and we will be very pleased if you join with your Gallardo when she is ready""
Everything was fine , he was gentle and tried to answer my questions step by step about G vs M6 test in AMUS
But then
When my car arrived i again contacted him but noone replied to me for 2-3 weeks.
Quote:
mp said:
These results are certainly inconsistent and hard to believe. Did they mention anything about "wind conditions"?
Besides headwinds, crosswinds can also negatively affect high speed runs.
As I've mentioned before, be careful when placing too much credence on Magazine tests. Unfortunately, too many variables can affect their test results. Many of these variables are kept close to their chests for the sake of their credibility - otherwise nobody would believe them anymore. And many of us already don't!!
Jul 11, 2007 8:56:16 PM