Crown

Board: AMG Mercedes Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    JimFlat6 said:
    Its power and transmission are stupendous. It will probably NOT have Porsches annoying throttle lag that all Cayennes have.

    All hail Benz as the SUV Super Power!



    As others have said, an AMG SUV isn't on the top of the list, I would take the Audi over this 3 ton armored thing, of course I would also take a supercharged Range Rover, and a Cayenne Turbo...what good is power if cannot be harnessed properly? Those AMG boys love to just throw in extra HP...maybe next time they should pay more attention to the handling since not every road simply goes straight

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:


    As others have said, an AMG SUV isn't on the top of the list, I would take the Audi over this 3 ton armored thing, of course I would also take a supercharged Range Rover, and a Cayenne Turbo...what good is power if cannot be harnessed properly? Those AMG boys love to just throw in extra HP...maybe next time they should pay more attention to the handling since not every road simply goes straight



    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:


    As others have said, an AMG SUV isn't on the top of the list, I would take the Audi over this 3 ton armored thing, of course I would also take a supercharged Range Rover, and a Cayenne Turbo...what good is power if cannot be harnessed properly? Those AMG boys love to just throw in extra HP...maybe next time they should pay more attention to the handling since not every road simply goes straight



    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    I love your signature quote from our Commander in Chief - that's great



    Did he really say that?

    Forget I asked that stupid question? Why should I doubt that he could have said it.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    I love your signature quote from our Commander in Chief - that's great



    Did he really say that?

    Forget I asked that stupid question? Why should I doubt that he could have said it.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:

    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...



    Oh you bet I am - you can apply those comments to other AMG models, steering doesn't impress me in the least bit

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:

    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...



    Oh you bet I am - you can apply those comments to other AMG models, steering doesn't impress me in the least bit

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:
    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:

    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...



    Oh you bet I am - you can apply those comments to other AMG models, steering doesn't impress me in the least bit



    I suggest you do some research on this vehicle. It will put the Cayenne Turbo to shame.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:
    Quote:
    svtrader1 said:

    Are you referring to the new ML63 AMG? I don't think you are...



    Oh you bet I am - you can apply those comments to other AMG models, steering doesn't impress me in the least bit



    I suggest you do some research on this vehicle. It will put the Cayenne Turbo to shame.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:
    Quote:
    JimFlat6 said:
    Its power and transmission are stupendous. It will probably NOT have Porsches annoying throttle lag that all Cayennes have.

    All hail Benz as the SUV Super Power!



    As others have said, an AMG SUV isn't on the top of the list, I would take the Audi over this 3 ton armored thing, of course I would also take a supercharged Range Rover, and a Cayenne Turbo...what good is power if cannot be harnessed properly? Those AMG boys love to just throw in extra HP...maybe next time they should pay more attention to the handling since not every road simply goes straight



    Your must have lost something about it all. The ML63 is no G series and even in its base form its a much better handler than a Audi or Rover, Its substantially quicker than a Cayenne turbo.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    ajcastaneda said:
    Quote:
    JimFlat6 said:
    Its power and transmission are stupendous. It will probably NOT have Porsches annoying throttle lag that all Cayennes have.

    All hail Benz as the SUV Super Power!



    As others have said, an AMG SUV isn't on the top of the list, I would take the Audi over this 3 ton armored thing, of course I would also take a supercharged Range Rover, and a Cayenne Turbo...what good is power if cannot be harnessed properly? Those AMG boys love to just throw in extra HP...maybe next time they should pay more attention to the handling since not every road simply goes straight



    Your must have lost something about it all. The ML63 is no G series and even in its base form its a much better handler than a Audi or Rover, Its substantially quicker than a Cayenne turbo.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    I'll be the first to post a scan of a professional comparo between the two vehicles....and then buy an AMG vehicle for the girlfriend...she'll look great driving it over to Neiman Marcus...


    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    I'll be the first to post a scan of a professional comparo between the two vehicles....and then buy an AMG vehicle for the girlfriend...she'll look great driving it over to Neiman Marcus...


    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Will the lameness ever stop??

    A friend of mine just bought a Toyota Landcruiser with a zink in it.
    Yes, a zink.
    It's a special camper version that sells well in Denmark because people can save a bundle of money buying a camper-fitted car than a regular.
    It's almost 50% rebate.
    He still paid a little more than 100,000 USD fot the car here (yes, 100 K), which I feel is totally lame for a car that will be driven by his wife...on asphalt...in suburbia....to and from kindergarten and the local shops.

    He proudly explained to me that he had it equipped with an electronic-automatic-gizmo-thingy gearbox with reduction-diff-climbing-feature...or something like that.
    I started laughing sponteaneously, asking him exactly WHAT mountain he was supposed to climb with it (Denmark is very flat) which I believe he didnt find too charming.
    But I told him the same thing, I will say about this Merc:

    Who in their right mind builds a 2 tonne-bigwheel-immagonnaclimbthismountain-monster...and then try to make it perform like a sportscar???????
    Thats is SO lame that I cant decide which is lamer: People who buy these automotive freaks or the carmakers who will do anything to sell a car - even if the car makes less sense than a 911TT with tractor wheels.

    This John Merrick of the car industry might do 0-100 km/h in 5 secs flat - AND SO WHAT?
    The moment it hits a corner with its gazillion BHPs it will need an ancor to slow down and towboat to push it thru the corner.

    And this Disco-Jeep cant even climb a real mountain- let alone a small hill, since they have probably fitted low profile rubber to make it "sporty".

    You all seem to focus on its 0-100 km/h Cayenne beating abilities.
    Put it on a track with a Cayenne. Make it Cayenne S to make it fair on the Merc. Then start the stop watch.
    I dunno about you guys. But my money is on the Cayenne.

    The Merc looks fine IMO and God bless those who buy one.
    But here's my advice:

    Get a Discovery if you want a real 4x4.
    Get a 911 if you want a real sportscar.
    But whatever you do - get real!

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Will the lameness ever stop??

    A friend of mine just bought a Toyota Landcruiser with a zink in it.
    Yes, a zink.
    It's a special camper version that sells well in Denmark because people can save a bundle of money buying a camper-fitted car than a regular.
    It's almost 50% rebate.
    He still paid a little more than 100,000 USD fot the car here (yes, 100 K), which I feel is totally lame for a car that will be driven by his wife...on asphalt...in suburbia....to and from kindergarten and the local shops.

    He proudly explained to me that he had it equipped with an electronic-automatic-gizmo-thingy gearbox with reduction-diff-climbing-feature...or something like that.
    I started laughing sponteaneously, asking him exactly WHAT mountain he was supposed to climb with it (Denmark is very flat) which I believe he didnt find too charming.
    But I told him the same thing, I will say about this Merc:

    Who in their right mind builds a 2 tonne-bigwheel-immagonnaclimbthismountain-monster...and then try to make it perform like a sportscar???????
    Thats is SO lame that I cant decide which is lamer: People who buy these automotive freaks or the carmakers who will do anything to sell a car - even if the car makes less sense than a 911TT with tractor wheels.

    This John Merrick of the car industry might do 0-100 km/h in 5 secs flat - AND SO WHAT?
    The moment it hits a corner with its gazillion BHPs it will need an ancor to slow down and towboat to push it thru the corner.

    And this Disco-Jeep cant even climb a real mountain- let alone a small hill, since they have probably fitted low profile rubber to make it "sporty".

    You all seem to focus on its 0-100 km/h Cayenne beating abilities.
    Put it on a track with a Cayenne. Make it Cayenne S to make it fair on the Merc. Then start the stop watch.
    I dunno about you guys. But my money is on the Cayenne.

    The Merc looks fine IMO and God bless those who buy one.
    But here's my advice:

    Get a Discovery if you want a real 4x4.
    Get a 911 if you want a real sportscar.
    But whatever you do - get real!

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Doc,
    In theory you're right.
    Cars like Cayenne turbo and ML63 don't make much sense.
    But the demande is here so the car manufacturers would be silly not to make them (if they can) and cash in the money.
    I also think like you, although a nice SUV is quite nice, it's no sport car, my favorite 4x4 is the Toyota Landcruiser Amazon (it has different names accross the world), so spacious, so robust, so comfortable, will go literally anywhere despite its huge size and no later than last week did over 800 km on one tank with it, can't complain.

    I see cars like Cayenne Turbo and ML63 a good alternative when a family father wants the best of both worlds and does not have the means to have a sports car and a family car in his garage.
    Having said that, there's also the satisfaction to know that you own the fastest SUV on production, but refuelling my car every 350 km is not really my cup of tea. I guess you could push 450 km with a Cayenne T but you'd need to be easy on the pesal, in that case, might as well go for a good Disco or Landcruiser!

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Doc,
    In theory you're right.
    Cars like Cayenne turbo and ML63 don't make much sense.
    But the demande is here so the car manufacturers would be silly not to make them (if they can) and cash in the money.
    I also think like you, although a nice SUV is quite nice, it's no sport car, my favorite 4x4 is the Toyota Landcruiser Amazon (it has different names accross the world), so spacious, so robust, so comfortable, will go literally anywhere despite its huge size and no later than last week did over 800 km on one tank with it, can't complain.

    I see cars like Cayenne Turbo and ML63 a good alternative when a family father wants the best of both worlds and does not have the means to have a sports car and a family car in his garage.
    Having said that, there's also the satisfaction to know that you own the fastest SUV on production, but refuelling my car every 350 km is not really my cup of tea. I guess you could push 450 km with a Cayenne T but you'd need to be easy on the pesal, in that case, might as well go for a good Disco or Landcruiser!

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    It's a good job this car has loads of power. After all, it's gonna need it to tow an oil refinery around on a trailer...

    What is the fuel consumption of this beast??

    We pay GBP1 per litre now in the UK and it's still rising....and out of every Pounds1 we pay here, 64% is fuel tax going straight to the UK Treasury....

    The world is going crazy...bigger and bigger engines and horse power wars between the German manufacturers while the oil is drying up faster and faster because of demand in India and China...

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    It's a good job this car has loads of power. After all, it's gonna need it to tow an oil refinery around on a trailer...

    What is the fuel consumption of this beast??

    We pay GBP1 per litre now in the UK and it's still rising....and out of every Pounds1 we pay here, 64% is fuel tax going straight to the UK Treasury....

    The world is going crazy...bigger and bigger engines and horse power wars between the German manufacturers while the oil is drying up faster and faster because of demand in India and China...

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .



    Bilal,

    Your post is a pure, unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy.
    Nobody is saying anything about the horsepower number, but people ARE talking about the concept of the car itself. A two-and-a-half ton SUV with a gazillion bhp, which isn't suitable for anything but paved roads (too many painted panels and the tyres aren't great either), where a similarly powered limousine will kick its ass. The limo can also carry five people, has vastly superior aerodynamics and is a lot safer for other participants in traffic when colliding with them. If I were a pedestrian being run over by some soccer mom, talking on the phone, I'd much rather be hit by a Civic than by this monstrosity, where the impact would definately crush my chest. Not to mention that these cars are completely unsuitable for european city traffic because of their above standard measurements and most often being driven by women... You should get the point by now. Just because it's a Mercedes you don't need to defend it so eagerly. Opinion doesn't differ by brand.
    I'll take an Audi RS6 any day over this.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .



    Bilal,

    Your post is a pure, unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy.
    Nobody is saying anything about the horsepower number, but people ARE talking about the concept of the car itself. A two-and-a-half ton SUV with a gazillion bhp, which isn't suitable for anything but paved roads (too many painted panels and the tyres aren't great either), where a similarly powered limousine will kick its ass. The limo can also carry five people, has vastly superior aerodynamics and is a lot safer for other participants in traffic when colliding with them. If I were a pedestrian being run over by some soccer mom, talking on the phone, I'd much rather be hit by a Civic than by this monstrosity, where the impact would definately crush my chest. Not to mention that these cars are completely unsuitable for european city traffic because of their above standard measurements and most often being driven by women... You should get the point by now. Just because it's a Mercedes you don't need to defend it so eagerly. Opinion doesn't differ by brand.
    I'll take an Audi RS6 any day over this.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Well hows does the Cayenne sell so well? I don't know about the Amerian sales, but over here its used the same way like any other 4X4. Yet lets not bash it because its a Porsche. But oh if Mercedes makes a 500hp 4X4..."Oh heavens....lets get our panties in a a twist"

    Civic or ML, at similar speeds of 40mph+, you're going to die regardless, thats beside the point. How stupid is it to judge a car's usefulness by predicting its pedestrian damage???

    Yes a limo is much superior but why are all the X5/Range Rover/Cayenne/Touareg buyers in the UK at least buying these monsters? The Cayenne and the Range Rover, are all pushing 500/400hp, even the 350hp or so X5 is dangerous.


    But lets not bash them shall we, because they're great cars, the Cayenne especially, but the ML....oh no no no no.....



    FYI, this is not a personal attack or a blind brand defence of Mercedes, the sheer point of my posts is to stop these ludicrous arguments that people put forward on why this car is useless, and people are buying it !!!!!!!

    If these cars are pointless, why are they selling in the UK by the shedload?


    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Well hows does the Cayenne sell so well? I don't know about the Amerian sales, but over here its used the same way like any other 4X4. Yet lets not bash it because its a Porsche. But oh if Mercedes makes a 500hp 4X4..."Oh heavens....lets get our panties in a a twist"

    Civic or ML, at similar speeds of 40mph+, you're going to die regardless, thats beside the point. How stupid is it to judge a car's usefulness by predicting its pedestrian damage???

    Yes a limo is much superior but why are all the X5/Range Rover/Cayenne/Touareg buyers in the UK at least buying these monsters? The Cayenne and the Range Rover, are all pushing 500/400hp, even the 350hp or so X5 is dangerous.


    But lets not bash them shall we, because they're great cars, the Cayenne especially, but the ML....oh no no no no.....



    FYI, this is not a personal attack or a blind brand defence of Mercedes, the sheer point of my posts is to stop these ludicrous arguments that people put forward on why this car is useless, and people are buying it !!!!!!!

    If these cars are pointless, why are they selling in the UK by the shedload?


    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Well hows does the Cayenne sell so well? I don't know about the Amerian sales, but over here its used the same way like any other 4X4. Yet lets not bash it because its a Porsche. But oh if Mercedes makes a 500hp 4X4..."Oh heavens....lets get our panties in a a twist"

    Civic or ML, at similar speeds of 40mph+, you're going to die regardless, thats beside the point. How stupid is it to judge a car's usefulness by predicting its pedestrian damage???

    Yes a limo is much superior but why are all the X5/Range Rover/Cayenne/Touareg buyers in the UK at least buying these monsters? The Cayenne and the Range Rover, are all pushing 500/400hp, even the 350hp or so X5 is dangerous.


    But lets not bash them shall we, because they're great cars, the Cayenne especially, but the ML....oh no no no no.....



    FYI, this is not a personal attack or a blind brand defence of Mercedes, the sheer point of my posts is to stop these ludicrous arguments that people put forward on why this car is useless, and people are buying it !!!!!!!

    If these cars are pointless, why are they selling in the UK by the shedload?





    First off, I said that bashing wasn't dependent on the brand. I think the Cayenne is just as pointless as the ML. Surviving an impact at 40+ mph is possible, I have witnessed it with my own eyes. The guy was hurt pretty badly, but he stayed alive. If an SUV were to hit him, dead center in his torso at 40 mph, do you think he'd still be alive?
    Pertaining Range Rovers and X5s, YES, they are all dangerous. The ML, the X5, the Cayenne, the Q7 and the list goes on.
    The Cayenne certainly is a great car, so is the ML. But suitable? Not in my opinion.
    The cars are selling because it's become a fashion trend to have one. There is no end to human vanity. There is a difference though. We buy sports cars because we love to go fast on the straights and in the corners. SUVs on the other hand are pointless, except for a small number of people who actually use them on rough terrain. If I want to carry fie people in a powerful car I can buy an RS6 (or an E55, thank you). If I want loads of room I will buy a van. If I want to se the car for rough terrain I can buy an SUV. How many people, however, do actually use the capabilities of SUVs? Now I can understand that the Americans don't agree with me on this and hey, fine by me. If they have an army to support their oil habit, go ahead, it doesn't bother me. Europeans however should show a bit more prudence. Just my humble opinion.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Well hows does the Cayenne sell so well? I don't know about the Amerian sales, but over here its used the same way like any other 4X4. Yet lets not bash it because its a Porsche. But oh if Mercedes makes a 500hp 4X4..."Oh heavens....lets get our panties in a a twist"

    Civic or ML, at similar speeds of 40mph+, you're going to die regardless, thats beside the point. How stupid is it to judge a car's usefulness by predicting its pedestrian damage???

    Yes a limo is much superior but why are all the X5/Range Rover/Cayenne/Touareg buyers in the UK at least buying these monsters? The Cayenne and the Range Rover, are all pushing 500/400hp, even the 350hp or so X5 is dangerous.


    But lets not bash them shall we, because they're great cars, the Cayenne especially, but the ML....oh no no no no.....



    FYI, this is not a personal attack or a blind brand defence of Mercedes, the sheer point of my posts is to stop these ludicrous arguments that people put forward on why this car is useless, and people are buying it !!!!!!!

    If these cars are pointless, why are they selling in the UK by the shedload?





    First off, I said that bashing wasn't dependent on the brand. I think the Cayenne is just as pointless as the ML. Surviving an impact at 40+ mph is possible, I have witnessed it with my own eyes. The guy was hurt pretty badly, but he stayed alive. If an SUV were to hit him, dead center in his torso at 40 mph, do you think he'd still be alive?
    Pertaining Range Rovers and X5s, YES, they are all dangerous. The ML, the X5, the Cayenne, the Q7 and the list goes on.
    The Cayenne certainly is a great car, so is the ML. But suitable? Not in my opinion.
    The cars are selling because it's become a fashion trend to have one. There is no end to human vanity. There is a difference though. We buy sports cars because we love to go fast on the straights and in the corners. SUVs on the other hand are pointless, except for a small number of people who actually use them on rough terrain. If I want to carry fie people in a powerful car I can buy an RS6 (or an E55, thank you). If I want loads of room I will buy a van. If I want to se the car for rough terrain I can buy an SUV. How many people, however, do actually use the capabilities of SUVs? Now I can understand that the Americans don't agree with me on this and hey, fine by me. If they have an army to support their oil habit, go ahead, it doesn't bother me. Europeans however should show a bit more prudence. Just my humble opinion.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .



    Before you started mouthing off, you should have made sure that you read my post carefully and understood it.

    I am not an environmentalist. I don't have any personal grievance against Mercedes Benz. I don't like diesel cars.

    I made fun of the fuel consumption of the ML63 AMG in light of the rising cost of petrol in the UK and the inevitability of future price rises caused by escalating demand in developing countries.

    Learn to read.

    NB: I won't be replying to anything you write.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    Bilal said:
    Its funny, how childish such comments sound. I seriously can't believe it but the sheer mind behind such comments is unbelievable. Lets look at the logic:

    AMG 500hp engine in a ML---> why so much power we should all buy diesels, petrol os so damn expensive, what a waste of car.

    WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON A CAR FORUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Go become an environmentalist and throw flan's on Jeremy Clarkson's face when he comes out of Oxford!!!

    There is no point in having a 500hp ML is there? Well thats your opinion. The ML can come with an off-road package, why don't some of you try it out in the rough stuff before making such sweeping statements and categotizing this off-roader with the mainstream bunch of crap that other manufacturers throw out.

    I swear I have never heard such asinine and childish comments before. Sure have a go at its automatic-only gearbox, its 155mph speedlimiter, its numb steering, its bad build quality and unreliability, but don't "diss" it for having a 500hp engine, that is a pure unadulterated display of deranged, hair-brained lunacy .



    Before you started mouthing off, you should have made sure that you read my post carefully and understood it.

    I am not an environmentalist. I don't have any personal grievance against Mercedes Benz. I don't like diesel cars.

    I made fun of the fuel consumption of the ML63 AMG in light of the rising cost of petrol in the UK and the inevitability of future price rises caused by escalating demand in developing countries.

    Learn to read.

    NB: I won't be replying to anything you write.

    Re: New ML 63 AMG Unveiled

    Quote:
    easy_rider911 said:



    NB: I won't be replying to anything you write.



    Thanks for the favour

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part I) Thread Closed 9/24/20 12:47 AM
    watt
    748146 2849
    Porsche Sticky The moment I've been waiting for... 8/11/21 2:00 PM
    throt
     
     
     
     
     
    451257 1287
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: New Porsche 911 Turbo S (2020) 9/21/21 11:01 AM
    Leawood911
    166512 1101
    Porsche Sticky Welcome to Rennteam: Cars and Coffee... (photos) 9/17/21 8:59 PM
    Boxster Coupe GTS
    65475 380
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 9/22/21 1:03 AM
    watt
    54131 512
    Porsche Sticky ROAD TEST: New 992 Carrera 4S 3/3/21 10:57 PM
    Wonderbar
    46496 336
    Porsche Sticky Porsche Taycan Turbo S - Short Review 10/19/20 6:12 PM
    Leawood911
    42953 380
    Porsche Sticky Porsche extends the Taycan model range (Taycan 2WD) 2/1/21 12:42 PM
    Leawood911
    11998 29
    Porsche Cayman GT4 5/4/21 4:46 PM
    Topspeed
    465077 3586
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 911 GT2 RS (2017) 6/25/21 2:56 PM
    the-missile
    384876 3506
    McLaren McLaren on a winning streak 8/12/21 4:57 PM
    Topspeed
    381320 3918
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 991.2 GT3 RS (2018) 4/28/21 12:26 PM
    W8MM
    347301 3252
    Porsche Tesla Roadster 9/23/20 8:22 PM
    bluelines
    337074 4279
    Porsche OFFICIAL: 911 R (2016) 12/8/20 7:51 PM
    DJM48
    317024 2646
    Porsche 992 GT3 9/17/21 4:41 PM
    lexs4
    262511 2975
    Porsche OFFICIAL: The new Porsche 992 – a design icon and high-tech sports car 7/20/21 3:10 PM
    Topspeed
    249879 1567
    Porsche OFFICIAL: New Panamera (2016) 2/11/21 9:22 AM
    Itsme
    167435 1379
    Others Alfa Romeo 4C 9/23/20 10:22 AM
    RCA
    143217 792
    Lambo Lamborghini Huracan and variants 4/9/21 4:32 PM
    Topspeed
    117956 1225
    Porsche Donor vehicle for Singer Vehicle Design 9/22/21 1:28 AM
    Leawood911
    101740 749
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 7/5/21 4:30 PM
    BjoernB
    92201 1221
    McLaren F1 7/10/21 7:43 AM
    BiTurbo
    82017 209
    Lambo Aventador and SV 8/27/21 2:33 PM
    Topspeed
    71349 698
    AMG AMG GT R 7/8/21 3:07 PM
    CGX car nut
    71142 824
    Porsche Nürburgring - Tesla vs. Taycan 11/23/20 6:10 PM
    Topspeed
    50575 596
    Others Tesla 2 the new thread 9/14/21 1:11 PM
    BjoernB
    47169 1165
    Others Bugatti Chiron 7/22/21 6:55 PM
    Topspeed
    41905 480
    Ferrari Ferrari 812 Superfast 6/24/21 6:30 PM
    Porker
    39705 531
    Porsche Olive 991.2 GT3 Clubsport 1/1/21 7:58 PM
    throt
    38459 615
    BMW M BMW M2 Rumors 7/7/21 8:38 PM
    Jim_in_Iowa
    30398 394
    269 items found, displaying 1 to 30.