Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Aug 26, 2006 4:13:27 PM
Aug 26, 2006 7:02:44 PM
Quote:
Super Darius said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Quattroruote is like toilet paper!![]()
![]()
Quote:
Duncan said:Quote:
Super Darius said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Quattroruote is like toilet paper!![]()
![]()
Because the Porsche is very slow......![]()
Aug 26, 2006 8:15:44 PM
Aug 26, 2006 8:45:20 PM
Quote:
Eggplant Cab said:
What I do find most interesting about that test isn't the track times etc but the fact that the American cars got the top speed win, coming from a country where you can't go faster than 100mph on any public road 'legally'. I think it's hilarious.
And really, do you think anyone goes out to buy a car based on what a magazine says? Surely not. Although I'm sure a few will hide the magazines from their friends. Maybe the Porsche had bridgestones on?![]()
Aug 26, 2006 10:23:17 PM
Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Quote:
DavidSF said:Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Firstly, I think the wrong Porsche weapon was used in this test. I think the 997 GT3/GT3RS would have been more appropriate. That said, if I were considering the 997TT, these track data results wouldn't affect my decision making one bit. The 997TT is still the best car of the test for everyday street use.
David
Aug 27, 2006 7:08:17 AM
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
DavidSF said:Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Firstly, I think the wrong Porsche weapon was used in this test. I think the 997 GT3/GT3RS would have been more appropriate. That said, if I were considering the 997TT, these track data results wouldn't affect my decision making one bit. The 997TT is still the best car of the test for everyday street use.
David
The test was sponsored by Ferrari and the Turbo was in bad mechanical condition, with a totally worn-out clutch. Don't concern yourself with these results, as they are as FAKE as Pamela Anderson.
Aug 27, 2006 7:10:04 AM
Quote:
Duncan said:Quote:
Super Darius said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Quattroruote is like toilet paper!![]()
![]()
Because the Porsche is very slow......![]()
Aug 27, 2006 7:43:28 AM
Quote:
Super Darius said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
DavidSF said:Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Firstly, I think the wrong Porsche weapon was used in this test. I think the 997 GT3/GT3RS would have been more appropriate. That said, if I were considering the 997TT, these track data results wouldn't affect my decision making one bit. The 997TT is still the best car of the test for everyday street use.
David
The test was sponsored by Ferrari and the Turbo was in bad mechanical condition, with a totally worn-out clutch. Don't concern yourself with these results, as they are as FAKE as Pamela Anderson.
very well said..this is why i said Quattroruote is like toilet paper
![]()
Aug 27, 2006 7:54:10 AM
Quote:
Super Darius said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
DavidSF said:Quote:
nberry said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Repost! Same article was in Italian Quattroroute 45 days ago...
Quattroroute is only good for one thing - for feeding the fireplace![]()
![]()
![]()
Are you sure this is the same test?![]()
I have not seen the article but this test seems to show the 430 winning more performance test than the Quattroroute test.
If it is the same test, then I believe this is the third US car magazine to publish it. Crash is right; very bad PR for the 997TT. But let's be honest. It is doing a favor for some would be 997TT buyers who decide not buy based on US published performance reports.![]()
Firstly, I think the wrong Porsche weapon was used in this test. I think the 997 GT3/GT3RS would have been more appropriate. That said, if I were considering the 997TT, these track data results wouldn't affect my decision making one bit. The 997TT is still the best car of the test for everyday street use.
David
The test was sponsored by Ferrari and the Turbo was in bad mechanical condition, with a totally worn-out clutch. Don't concern yourself with these results, as they are as FAKE as Pamela Anderson.
very well said..this is why i said Quattroruote is like toilet paper
![]()
Quote:
VGA18 said:
Doesnt the R&T's 997 Turbo datas seem as same as the 0-250kmh video of 997 TT ?
I am confused so much.
Quote:
Fast Fred said:
A detailed test in a Belgian car magazine reports the overall improvement to the 996 turbo. About performance, acceleration is better (22,1 sec for 1 km vs. 23 sec.) BUT (!!) the 997 is 0.2 to 0.4 sec slower than the 996 for the 60-90 and 90-120 kmph tests in 4th and 5th gear. They say it's because of the greater responding time of the new turbosystem.
This surprises and disappoints, because these are somehow the most important testfigures concerning daily driving !