Mar 13, 2006 10:25:17 AM
Quote:
Ronnie said:Quote:
mumbasic said:
Ronnie, did you ever drive a 997 4S?
...
AM
Yeah... I decided on C2S as my preferred choice so far.
Quote:
mumbasic said:Quote:
Ronnie said:Quote:
mumbasic said:
Ronnie, did you ever drive a 997 4S?
...
AM
Yeah... I decided on C2S as my preferred choice so far.
How long did you test the cars? Which tyres? PASM or sports suspension? How can Walter Röhrl be faster with C4S on the Nordschleife then with a C2S if the car is less sportier?
Some guys define sporty by oversteering. If that is what you like, then there are so many other cars which can do this better.
AM
Mar 15, 2006 5:06:44 PM
Mar 15, 2006 5:30:02 PM
Mar 15, 2006 6:00:23 PM
Quote:
Silver Bullet said:
What are the "official times" for the 997 C2S and the C4S with Rohl behind the wheel, and where do they come from (ie. what's the source).
Carlos - have you driven the 997 C4S? I know you had a lot to say about the difference between AWD and RWD in the 996 series - any thoughts on the 997?
I'm fascinated by this debate - I love it.
Quote:
mumbasic, I don't know what your problem is.
Quote:
I stand by my earlier comments... I prefer the C2S over the C4S. As I said, the C2S has more precise steering control and feel.
I also think this should be more important than the 44mm of extra width a wide body 997 gives you at the rear.
This "wide body" business is not such an issue or as noticeable with the 997 as it was with the 996. Either way... ENJOY.
My decision to purchase a 911 was very much an emotional one, so I wasn't that interested in the "many other cars which can do this better". This may not matter to you.
Also, I did not take a note book with me to record what tyres were on the cars I test drove, nor did I stop watch the time periods I spent in each. All I know is what I prefer and I would still recommend any one serious about buying one, but unsure on which version to test drive for themselves.
As for the Walter Röhrl comments... I can't see where I posted anything regarding one being sportier than the other so I can't see the relevance here.
It would be just as irrelevant for me to post that the reardriven CGT is faster round the ring than the C4Sso what??
Quote:
Some prefer the more precise steering control of rear wheel drive, some people prefer the understeer of all wheel drive
Mar 15, 2006 10:22:51 PM
Quote:
mumbasic said:Quote:
Silver Bullet said:
What are the "official times" for the 997 C2S and the C4S with Rohl behind the wheel, and where do they come from (ie. what's the source).
Carlos - have you driven the 997 C4S? I know you had a lot to say about the difference between AWD and RWD in the 996 series - any thoughts on the 997?
I'm fascinated by this debate - I love it.
In the hands of Walter Röhrl the C4S is 2 or 3 seconds faster.
AM
Mar 16, 2006 4:15:41 AM
Mar 16, 2006 7:17:46 AM
Quote:
Silver Bullet said:
I think I'm just going to have to finally drive a 997 C4S, but my dealer hasn't had a demo yet!!
Quote:
mumbasic said:
I have to say this is true for my car with summer tyres which are Bridgestone, I never tested other tyre brands. Also some guy from Porsche told me that with Conti tyres there will be understeer, that is for people who likes comfort.
AM
Mar 16, 2006 11:01:26 AM
Mar 16, 2006 4:35:40 PM
Quote:
easy_rider911 said:
When the C4 and C4S were launched, BBC Top Gear did a comparison of the RWD and AWD cars.
Result: around an indoor dirt track, the AWD was fractionally quicker but, and it's a big but, the Stig much preferred the handling and steering feel of the RWD.
Quote:
Gnil said:
I love my 4S, but if I had to do it again I would go for the 2S, as I have more times where I could enjoy the extra sportiveness of the 2S then the times where I need the extra traction of the 4S... but I have to say that during our winter the 4s is more adapted to the roads..