Quote:
Fanch said:
It should against the law for beautiful ladies to wear their top at the beach.
That's one of the few great things in France!
A few years ago, my wife took off her bra at the same beach the picture has been taken. She saw a nice woman without bra too and she thought that finally, US authoroties allowed this. Well, a few minutes later, a Fort Lauderdale beach patrol officer walked up to us a kindly asked my wife to put back her bra. Not because it would have offended somebody (despite one mega fat woman nearby maybe...
), my wife looks great but because of (this is what the officer told us) "little children" and "certain people".
When my wife started to argue with him that every little child already saw such "things"
and what he means by "certain people", he started to turn up the authoroty and threatened to arrest(!) her.
On the other hand, there is south beach(?) around Miami art deco where sunbathing without a top seems to be pretty common, although not quite legal as far as I heard. But it seems to be tolerated.
And to be honest: I never saw so many women with breast implants in my entire life like I see each time during my stay at the hotel in Fort Lauderdale. Now the question is: what is more offending, a super mega balloon bossom which looks like two airbags on a tiny little woman or a nicely shaped and not too small natural one breathing some fresh air?!
And now I shut up, I suppose this gets too far.
To answer fritz' question: the camera has a (hold your breath) 1728 mm zoom range. A 432 mm optical zoom range and a 4x digital zoom. Why the quality is so good? Well: there is an image stabilizer incorporated and believe it or not, the camera takes the same quality pictures at max digital zoom range even if the object of desire is moving.
Over the full zoom length a 2.8 stop.