Crown

Board: Porsche - 911 - 997 Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Looks like 7th gear in the PDK is just a cruising gear. 6th gear in manual and PDK are identical ratio (with same final drive) and 7th is just for fuel economy and low noise.

    PDK does have some slightly closer ratios (like shifts between 2nd & 3rd gears), but there is no complete realigning of the ratios for pure performance. Top speed will be achieved with 6th gear in the PDK, like a Corvette in 5th

    Gear Manual PDK
    1st 3.91 3.91
    2nd 2.32 2.29
    3rd 1.56 1.65
    4th 1.28 1.30
    5th 1.08 1.08
    6th 0.88 0.88
    7th ----- 0.62

    Final 3.44 3.44

    I bet they will save the real benefits of the 7 close ratios for the new GT3 (make new 7th gear close to the former 6th and move all the other ratios closer together)...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    Grant said:(make new 7th gear close to the former 6th and move all the other ratios closer together)...



    I was convinced this is what they would do with all 911 PDK's , its a sportcar for heaven's sake... dissapointing indeed.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    I would have preferred 7 "driving" ratios myself. But fuel economy, noise and emissions are important too.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Sorry, but it reinforces my argument that for real-world use, more than 6 gears is getting a bit silly/gimmicky/bragging-rights-ish...

    7 driving ratios? If better performance were the "basic" goal, and "X" amount of R&D resources were available, wouldn't 30-40 lbft more torque be more enjoyable and useable than an extra gear stuffed in? Call me a caveman, but if Porsche came to me and said "we've got $150 million to spend, would you like a 7-speed PDK, or a far thriftier-to-bring-to-market 6-speed along with 30 more lbft of grunt?".... I wouldn't even stutter.

    Yes, it's a "sports car", but it's a street car also... I'm guessing that they geared it so that it wouldn't be absolutely annoying to street drive, i.e. all of those ratios packed into your typical speed ranges, whereby you spend all day shifting and shifting with so little difference between gears. At least with a true manual, you can easily 1-3-5 shift, or 1-2-4-6, when you're just plinking around town or taking it easy... It's no sweat, you can drive your 6-speed like it's a 3-speed just by adjusting your pattern.

    But with PDK, that set sequence is always in your way, isn't it?

    It's just my guess, my attempt at slipping into the noggins of the engineers who put together this package.

    I get the "optimal performance" mechanical-engineering argument for 7 driving-range gears completely. I get the race-car argument.

    But hey, chalkboard math and real-world utility/interface don't always make a good marriage.

    Besides, I'd sooner drive an airport van than have one of those techno-geek clutchless-manuals anyhoo...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    69bossnine said:If Porsche came to me and said "we've got $150 million to spend, would you like a 7-speed PDK, or a far thriftier-to-bring-to-market 6-speed along with 30 more lbft of grunt?".... I wouldn't even stutter.


    I guess I'm greedy, since I'd like more power/torque and better gearing.

    Especially with the additional power and higher redline of the new DFI motors, 7 close ratios makes more sense than ever, imho...

    I guess the silver lining is that for those of us Luddites who like to shift with 3 pedals, there is not the performance penalty I expected by staying with a 6 speed manual...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Also interesting is the fact that PDK cars are little bit slower in top speed:
    300km/h for S(302km/h manual)
    287km/h for non S(289km/h manual)

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Also interesting is the fact that PDK cars are little bit slower in top speed:
    300km/h for S(302km/h manual)
    287km/h for non S(289km/h manual)


    Due to increased friction in PDK?

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Also interesting is the fact that PDK cars are little bit slower in top speed:
    300km/h for S(302km/h manual)
    287km/h for non S(289km/h manual)


    Due to increased friction in PDK?



    Honestly, I do not know. We need that dealers info PDF with all technical explanation...

    Just one question-what would happened if you manually shift up at say 299km/h in sixth?

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Also interesting is the fact that PDK cars are little bit slower in top speed:
    300km/h for S(302km/h manual)
    287km/h for non S(289km/h manual)


    Due to increased friction in PDK?



    or weight ??

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    In fact I do not see the problem. The higher redline encourages to use the 7th ratio as an economical gear and I found the six ratios on the current car quite sufficient. If you use the car on the motorway at cruising speed it does make sence. Funny that it is you guys in the restricted US that complain about that setup.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    intouch1 said:
    Quote:
    Grant said:
    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Also interesting is the fact that PDK cars are little bit slower in top speed:
    300km/h for S(302km/h manual)
    287km/h for non S(289km/h manual)


    Due to increased friction in PDK?



    or weight ??


    More weight wouldn't cause a lower top speed, it would just take longer to get there...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Just one question-what would happened if you manually shift up at say 299km/h in sixth?


    The car would slow down due to less power at lower rpms

    Peak power is at 6,500 rpm and I imagine 7th gear would give far less than that at 299kph. Maybe the slightly lower top speed is actually in 7th gear (compared to 6th in manual), but I would expect the loss to be greater than that

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    KresoF1 said:
    Just one question-what would happened if you manually shift up at say 299km/h in sixth?



    In this case the PCM screen flashes a large "NEIN!!!" and the car stays in 6th.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Points taken, but in all things, Porsche has to weigh the desires of the minority against the preferrences of the majority of their prospective PDK customers...

    They've gotta avoid being annoying to most, just to please that rabid lunatic fringe..

    Unfortunately, for every one of you who opt for the new PDK for its real-application cutting-edge track performance, you'll have 10 goofballs who are simply too lazy to shift, and got it because its cool-factor and gizmo-video-game appeal.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Actually, I just computed that 7th gear is 29.5% taller than 6th, so shifting at 7,500 rpm at 300kph into 7th gear would put the revs at 5,288rpm (too low to maintain 300kph, I would think).

    I need to compare power at 7,500rpm (lower than peak at 6,500) to the power at 5,300rpm (also lower than peak).

    Optimum gearing would put top speed at 6,500rpm in 7th gear (my guess, it would be well over 300kph with a 7th gear ratio around 0.73).

    Maybe Porsche chose this compromise, so that top speed would be about the same in either 6th or 7th, but neither can reach the potential top speed of the car with its power and aerodynamics

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    It's all to do with MPG. Drop the revs, more MPG. I bet the new MPG figures are with the car stuck in 7th at 56mph I'm sure. I wonder how much more efficient the DFI engine is for that matter as the MPG figures will be a bit distorted.

    On the subject of PDK, I wonder why you can't hear any of the gear changes, surely that would have made sense to show how quick it actually did change gear. We'll know soon enough I'm sure...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    7th gear is for claiming MPG increase. That's all. Don't use if it you don't want.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    sws1 said:
    7th gear is for claiming MPG increase. That's all. Don't use if it you don't want.



    I agree - this is for fuel consumption etc. Porsche, as with all other manufacturers, is under a lot of pressure to improve fuel economy and CO2 emissions. This was there way of trying to keep people happy. I'm sure they would have rather had 7 "driving" gears as well.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    donkeyman said:... This was [their] way of driving to keep people happy. I'm sure they would have rather had 7 "driving" gears as well.



    But would it make any practical difference if to have 7 close-spaced cogs instead of 6? To take advantage of that one would be shifting all the time.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    ADias said:
    But would it make any practical difference if to have 7 close-spaced cogs instead of 6? To take advantage of that one would be shifting all the time.


    I think it would be great. It's not much effort to flex your thumb or forefinger and there's no lapse in the power delivery (just more of it with better gear spacing)...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    ResB said:
    It's all to do with MPG. Drop the revs, more MPG. I bet the new MPG figures are with the car stuck in 7th at 56mph I'm sure. I wonder how much more efficient the DFI engine is for that matter as the MPG figures will be a bit distorted.



    The driving cycle conditions at which the "official" consumption figures are measured are prescribed by law, so manufacturers do not have the freedom to "optimize" the figures in the manner you describe.

    The standard driving cycles are intended to make the "urban", "extra-urban" and "combined" fuel consumption figures you read in car ads directly comparable with each other amongst different car models.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    They absolutely can optimize the engines for certain speeds. Here are how the tests work:

    Two separate fuel economy tests simulate city driving and highway driving: the city driving program consists of starting with a cold engine and making 23 stops over a period of 31 minutes for an average speed of 20 mph (32 km/h) and with a top speed of 56 mph (90 km/h); the highway program uses a warmed-up engine and makes no stops, averaging 48 mph (77 km/h) with a top speed of 60 mph (97 km/h) over a 10 mile (16 km) distance. The measurements are then adjusted downward by 10% (city) and 22% (highway) to more accurately reflect real-world results.

    It's fairly easy to lean out the engine and design it for the upper 40 / low 50s mph range.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    sws1 said:
    They absolutely can optimize the engines for certain speeds. Here are how the tests work:

    Two separate fuel economy tests simulate city driving and highway driving: the city driving program consists of starting with a cold engine and making 23 stops over a period of 31 minutes for an average speed of 20 mph (32 km/h) and with a top speed of 56 mph (90 km/h); the highway program uses a warmed-up engine and makes no stops, averaging 48 mph (77 km/h) with a top speed of 60 mph (97 km/h) over a 10 mile (16 km) distance. The measurements are then adjusted downward by 10% (city) and 22% (highway) to more accurately reflect real-world results.

    It's fairly easy to lean out the engine and design it for the upper 40 / low 50s mph range.



    If you re-read my post you'll see that the "optimization" which I said was not possible involved a proposal that the consumption be measured "at (constant) 56 mph in 7th. gear".

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Grant,

    If I understand the double clutch correctly, the added weight is not just added, some of it is also rotating.

    A question I have related to the double clutch, is how quickly you can downshift two gears...?

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    fritz said:
    Quote:
    ResB said:
    It's all to do with MPG. Drop the revs, more MPG. I bet the new MPG figures are with the car stuck in 7th at 56mph I'm sure. I wonder how much more efficient the DFI engine is for that matter as the MPG figures will be a bit distorted.



    The driving cycle conditions at which the "official" consumption figures are measured are prescribed by law, so manufacturers do not have the freedom to "optimize" the figures in the manner you describe.

    The standard driving cycles are intended to make the "urban", "extra-urban" and "combined" fuel consumption figures you read in car ads directly comparable with each other amongst different car models.



    Fritz is right but as always, you'll never achieve the manufacturer's figures in real life. A porsche that does less than 10 liter/ 100 km ... what a joke!


    If you do achieve it, that means you're not driving properly. You can go buy a golf diesel instead, you won't see the difference.


    Even a boxster can't drink so little.
    .

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    davew (cincy) said:
    Grant,

    If I understand the double clutch correctly, the added weight is not just added, some of it is also rotating.

    A question I have related to the double clutch, is how quickly you can downshift two gears...?



    even gears are on 1 shaft uneven on another. you could shift directly from 7th to 3rd....
    the rotating assembly is not heavier. the whole transmission is heavier due to the double set of gears involved. still, pdk is lighter than tiptronic.

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    another question... since we know the PDK has a lower TOP SPEED...

    will be the PDK really faster?

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Quote:
    xandi911 said:
    another question... since we know the PDK has a lower TOP SPEED...

    will be the PDK really faster?


    It will be quicker to accelerate and faster on a racetrack, but less fun imho...

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Carrera S:
    1. 69 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    2. 117 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    3. 174 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    4. 212 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    5. 251 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    6. 302 km/h @ 7350 rpm
    ___________________________
    Carrera S PDK:
    1. 69 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    2. 118 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    3. 164 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    4. 209 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    5. 251 km/h @ 7500 rpm
    6. 300 km/h @ 7300 rpm
    7. 300 km/h @ 5150 rpm

    Re: Disappointed in 7th gear ratio for PDK

    Interesting - although a reduced top speed in 3rd the pdk is a closer ratio in the 2nd/3rd/4th acceleration zone

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 4/17/24 7:16 AM
    GnilM
    760639 1798
    Porsche Sticky Welcome to Rennteam: Cars and Coffee... (photos) 4/7/24 11:48 AM
    Boxster Coupe GTS
    434352 565
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Cayman GT4 RS (2021) 5/12/23 12:11 PM
    W8MM
    259998 288
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS - 2022 3/12/24 8:28 AM
    DJM48
    257136 323
    Porsche Sticky The new Macan: the first all-electric SUV from Porsche 1/30/24 9:18 AM
    RCA
    80744 45
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Taycan 2024 Facelift 3/15/24 1:23 PM
    CGX car nut
    5311 50
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 2/1/24 7:01 PM
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    871252 1364
    Porsche 992 GT3 7/23/23 7:01 PM
    Grant
    806417 3868
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 2/10/24 4:43 PM
    nberry
    386379 1526
    Porsche GT4RS 4/17/24 8:53 PM
    GaussM
    384655 1452
    Others Tesla 2 the new thread 12/13/23 2:48 PM
    CGX car nut
    367644 2401
    Porsche Donor vehicle for Singer Vehicle Design 7/3/23 12:30 PM
    Porker
    365726 797
    Ferrari Ferrari 812 Superfast 4/21/23 8:09 AM
    the-missile
    288352 550
    Porsche Red Nipples 991.2 GT3 Touring on tour 4/11/24 12:32 PM
    Ferdie
    285728 668
    Porsche Collected my 997 GTS today 10/19/23 7:06 PM
    CGX car nut
     
     
     
     
     
    258949 812
    Lambo Huracán EVO STO 7/30/23 6:59 PM
    mcdelaug
    236932 346
    Lotus Lotus Emira 6/25/23 2:53 PM
    Enmanuel
    224969 101
    Others Corvette C8 10/16/23 3:24 PM
    Enmanuel
    219610 488
    Others Gordon Murray - T.50 11/22/23 10:27 AM
    mcdelaug
    166797 387
    Porsche Back to basics - 996 GT3 RS 6/11/23 5:13 PM
    CGX car nut
    138778 144
    BMW M 2024 BMW M3 CS Official Now 12/29/23 9:04 AM
    RCA
    115547 303
    Motor Sp. 2023 Formula One 12/19/23 5:38 AM
    WhoopsyM
    107403 685
    Others Valkyrie final design? 4/28/23 2:45 AM
    Rossi
    99279 219
    Porsche 2022 992 Safari Model 3/7/24 4:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    83586 239
    AMG Mercedes-Benz W124 500E aka Porsche typ 2758 2/23/24 10:03 PM
    blueflame
    74891 297
    Porsche 992 GT3 RS 3/3/24 7:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    53113 314
    Motor Sp. Porsche 963 3/16/24 9:27 PM
    WhoopsyM
    24681 237
    Ferrari Ferrari 296 GTB (830PS, Hybrid V6) 1/21/24 4:29 PM
    GT-Boy
    20938 103
    BMW M 2022 BMW M5 CS 4/8/24 1:43 PM
    Ferdie
    19213 140
    AMG G63 sold out 9/15/23 7:38 PM
    Nico997
    16461 120
    129 items found, displaying 1 to 30.