Quote:
reginos said:
Quote:
Heist said:
Quote:
reginos said:
Not good at all for a car costing 60% more than the Turbo. Maybe if James Bond was behind the wheel it could be faster.
Yes, but the car is strictly limited craft production vehicle and the styling inside and out is a work of art.
Sometimes a little cost bump is justified. But that's up to you. Cost is what you pay, value is what you get.
For this kind of money wouldn't you rather be in a Ferrari 599 though? It has all the above advantages plus performance to match. No one could argue with you about your choice.
Actually, no. I think the 599 is not very attractive. A very good car, yes - but for some reason, when I see it in profile I see a C5/C6 Corvette. I don't want to think Corvette after I stroked a $300K+ check.
And once you get into this sort of stratospheric price range, performance becomes irrelevant -- it's more an emotional/stylistic statement for 85% of the buyers because only 15% will ever fully (or have the skill to) exploit the extra performance benefits.