Feb 5, 2008 8:43:51 PM
Feb 5, 2008 9:07:39 PM
Feb 6, 2008 4:25:19 AM
Quote:
Moogle said:Quote:
easy_rider911 said:
Eww. The more I see of the Panamera, the more I think that form following function is leading to this being one ugly car....
Haha so true.
Feb 6, 2008 2:11:35 PM
Quote:
reginos said:
People say this about Cayenne too. But 200,000 Cayennes later they should all shut up! I wonder how many "beautiful" Jaguars, Astons and Maseratis will be sold worldwide.
Feb 6, 2008 7:00:58 PM
Quote:
easy_rider911 said:
If you think that sales figures are all that matter, then good luck to you. You have to respect the fact that other people have a different opinion from you. My view is that, if I find a car ugly, I don't care how many other people bought it, the car will not start to look beautiful to me just because other people bought it. It's their money and they can spend it how they want. Their choice of spending won't affect my taste.
Quote:
Lars997 said:
I still dont see the point in having a 5 mtr long and 1.8 mtr wide Porsche monster.
This car will end up like Mercedes R class. Spacious and very interesting concept but at the end it didnt sell because the car is too ugly
Quote:
reginos said:Quote:
Lars997 said:
I still dont see the point in having a 5 mtr long and 1.8 mtr wide Porsche monster.
The Ferrari Scaglietti for example, which is neither 4 door nor real 4 seater and without the hatchback practicality, is 4.9m long and 1.96m wide and 1840kg. Yet no one has anything negative to say about Ferrari (a 100% low volume sport car manufacturer) making a long, wide and heavy car! Double standards in my way of thinking. As regards the looks none of us can pass judgement because we haven't seen the baby yet.
Quote:
ed_moree said:Quote:
reginos said:Quote:
Lars997 said:
I still dont see the point in having a 5 mtr long and 1.8 mtr wide Porsche monster.
The Ferrari Scaglietti for example, which is neither 4 door nor real 4 seater and without the hatchback practicality, is 4.9m long and 1.96m wide and 1840kg. Yet no one has anything negative to say about Ferrari (a 100% low volume sport car manufacturer) making a long, wide and heavy car! Double standards in my way of thinking. As regards the looks none of us can pass judgement because we haven't seen the baby yet.
Good point!!! and lets not talk about Ferrari Scagalietti looks....
Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
ed_moree said:Quote:
reginos said:Quote:
Lars997 said:
I still dont see the point in having a 5 mtr long and 1.8 mtr wide Porsche monster.
The Ferrari Scaglietti for example, which is neither 4 door nor real 4 seater and without the hatchback practicality, is 4.9m long and 1.96m wide and 1840kg. Yet no one has anything negative to say about Ferrari (a 100% low volume sport car manufacturer) making a long, wide and heavy car! Double standards in my way of thinking. As regards the looks none of us can pass judgement because we haven't seen the baby yet.
Good point!!! and lets not talk about Ferrari Scagalietti looks....
The Scaglietti is not all that bad when you see it in flesh, I'd rather say it's impressive and mean looking. But I have to admit that it's not the best design from Ferrari in the last couple of years.
But concerning the weight, let's just wait and see if Porsche really manages to produce a car as big and as "light" as the 612 Scaglietti, since 1840kg are not that much for a car that big.
Quote:
MMD said:
Sorry, I can't stand the fake "Y" exhausts as seen on GM Pontiacs.
What's worse: the uneven carbonization is a ridiculous giveaway to everyone that they're fake.
Quote:
racerx said:
I will still wait for the official unveiling but this thing is not looking good at all!
Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MMD said:
Sorry, I can't stand the fake "Y" exhausts as seen on GM Pontiacs.
What's worse: the uneven carbonization is a ridiculous giveaway to everyone that they're fake.
Not sure about that. In fact I would expect an Y-exhaust to be covered with carbon in both endings. An uneven carbonisation is more an indication for a valve exhaust.
Feb 14, 2008 4:34:14 PM
Feb 14, 2008 4:52:23 PM
Feb 14, 2008 7:09:22 PM
Feb 15, 2008 5:47:58 AM