Dec 13, 2007 11:04:35 PM
- Testarossa86
- Junior
- Loc: SC
- Posts: 58, Gallery
- Registered on: Mar 8, 2006
F40 DESTROYS A Murcielago
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6605482602743585948
Dec 13, 2007 11:04:35 PM
Dec 13, 2007 11:59:52 PM
Dec 14, 2007 1:07:35 AM
Dec 14, 2007 5:51:11 AM
Dec 14, 2007 7:49:58 PM
Quote:
Heist said:
There was a segment on Top Gear 2 years ago, where Jeremy did a head to head w/supercars of Today (Enzo, CGT, Zonda) vs. those of the 90's (F40, Mcl F1, Jag X220) and the ones from the 90's WERE FASTER and better!
However the cars of today are 100% more reliable and safer ...
Quote:
Heist said:
^^^ To my knowledge, not any roadgoing car, no. As a matter fact due to increasing world wide safety mandated equipment and demand for greater creature amenities, each successive F has gotten a litte heavier.
Quote:
thuggy said:
Crumple zones, pedestrian friendly bumpers, passive safety devices such as airbags, brake pretensioners, power windows, ipod hookups, phone hookups, leather everything, side impact regulations, rollover concerns, sound requirements, ecological concerns, all add up to new cars having to meet and exceed both government and market demands that old cars never had to... hence a lot heavier and bigger.
Quote:
Rossi said:
The real problem is the ever increasing size. Take a look at the F360, which is bigger in every direction compared to its predecessor: though equipped with new light weight technology as space frame body made out of aluminium, this car weighs as much as the F355.
If companies built smaller cars, which doesn't mean cramped inside, just as big as the cars of the nineties like F355 or 993 for example, with today's technology cars would be considerably lighter.