Quote:
Rickless said:
Ok, admittedly I am not close to being a car expert and not even close to being a car enthusiat with most of you guys knowledge. Just a question though, If we look strictly at performance specs (not track times because I am asking for daily driving use) why would anyone justify the prrce of a GT2 or any Ferrari over a TT? I am very close to my production date on my Turbo Cab. zero to sixty and top speeds are so close, even with the 599GTB Fiorino. Obviously, there are differences between Ferrari and Porsche. More exclusivity, handmade Ferraris, I get it. i also get the fact that the cars have different appeals. I just get confused when I read almost every publication falling all over some models, and their respective specs are not better. Yes the GT2 has a higher all out top speed. So what> ??
Quote:
Rickless said:
a toyotas specs are not even close to the turbo. looking for real answers here. not sarcasm. are you saying the turbo is like a camry when compaerd to the other cars in my original post?
Nov 21, 2007 7:13:42 AM
Nov 21, 2007 12:15:33 PM
Nov 21, 2007 2:09:58 PM
Nov 21, 2007 2:11:18 PM
Quote:
WBH said:
IMO, car mag impressions are dubious at best....they don't hand out journalist jobs to just anyone....
The various pseudo-quant, pseudo-precise perf stats mean little....
Nov 21, 2007 4:54:44 PM
Quote:
Eaglejackson said:
The bad news is that there are other very high performance cars that will do specific tasks better.
Nov 21, 2007 6:12:54 PM
Nov 21, 2007 6:26:15 PM
Quote:
Eaglejackson said:
But bad news for those who do care a lot about track experience.
Also, for pure joy of handling on public roads, I really like a Boxster S,
Nov 21, 2007 9:23:33 PM
Nov 22, 2007 2:52:12 AM
Nov 22, 2007 5:27:35 PM
Dec 3, 2007 8:57:42 PM