Would argue police globally should spend more time and resources ticketing/revoking licenses for unsafe driving, like driving too fast vs weather/traffic; too limited following distances; DUI; distracted driving (phones/texting); running red lts/stop signs; using left lane for cruising; driving vehicle w/poorly secured cargo which may cause accid, etc etc.....errant extreme speeders are prob minor issue in terms of total death/injuries caused annually vs many other driving offenses....
Even on derestricted AB, suspect a Munich/Frankfurt plutocrat driving 599/65 and deemed to cause crash (involving serious injuries/death) due to excess speed vs conditions will likely face full wrath of criminal/civil litigation from ambitious prosecutors/litigators and a class-warfare-minded media and general public....
Suspect Darwinian selection often prevails in terms of cars driven and driving risk/reward decisions....most guys who can afford and choose to drive latest high-perf cars know when/where it makes sense to drive in more spirited manner...those who don't, face serious poss consequences (incl jail) if injuries/death involved....speeding tkts are trivial risks in macro-scheme of risks to affluent driver w/ample legal and philanthropic resources....
But prob far more non-affluent guys w/<200hp, 10yo cars/SUVs driving at <80MPH cause more injuries/death annually to others b/c of their poor/irresponsible driving....not a lot for them to lose in life anyway.....so their risk/reward equations...and judgments (or lack thereof) tend to "differ"...they don't hand out certain cars/SUVs and occupations to just anyone....