May 18, 2004 10:47:24 PM
- Captain Bady
- Veteran
- Loc: London
- Posts: 888, Gallery
- Registered on: Nov 14, 2003
May 18, 2004 10:47:24 PM
May 18, 2004 10:47:35 PM
May 18, 2004 10:48:40 PM
May 18, 2004 10:49:10 PM
May 18, 2004 10:49:29 PM
May 18, 2004 10:50:01 PM
May 18, 2004 11:08:14 PM
May 18, 2004 11:26:10 PM
May 18, 2004 11:32:32 PM
Quote:
nberry said:
I understand Porsches are designed for function and not style but whoever did this to the car should be shot!
May 19, 2004 9:27:03 AM
Quote:
nberry said:
Guy's what are you smoking? That is one of worst modified kits I have seen in a long time. The front lower fender is totally out of proportion to the rest of the car. The car looks like it swallowed a whale. The back wing made to copy the GT2, looks like a ricer wing and a bad one at that.
The side aero skirt is much to prominent and detracts from the lines of the car.
Quote:
I understand Porsches are designed for function and not style but whoever did this to the car should be shot!
May 19, 2004 9:40:02 AM
May 19, 2004 10:16:52 AM
Quote:
brunner said:
The GT2 did 7.46.
Butt ugly spoilers and 200hp more account for just 3 seconds?
The majority of tuners fail to deliver the promised performance, and ugly bodykits can't take its place.
When it comes to tuners (obviously, RUF aside). , i like Sportec. Tastefully modified exterior, and tuning based on racing experience.
http://www.fast-autos.net/sportec/sportecsp650.html
May 19, 2004 12:53:06 PM
May 19, 2004 1:40:18 PM
Quote:
carlos fromspain said:Quote:
brunner said:
The GT2 did 7.46.
Butt ugly spoilers and 200hp more account for just 3 seconds?
Brunner,
you should know better, you know how much is needed is to improve behond those numbers, dropping 3 seconds bellow the already extreme & track tunned GT2's 7:46 is really difficult, there is not that much left for improvement in that car.
May 19, 2004 2:46:51 PM
Quote:
brunner said:
That may be true, but still doesn't justify the ugly bodykit
Dont tell me it has to look like a fish to be fast
May 19, 2004 6:34:05 PM
Quote:
Tim said:
This time I'm on nberry's side.
It may be extremely capable on the track, but it's ugly as hell. The "ricer" version of an originally beautiful car.
RG TL
Quote:
And I'm sorry but when it comes to performance, Techart is one of the best tunners for Porsche, ever heard of the Tuner Grand Prix at Hockenheim? well, Techart usually dominates. And as a matter of fact last year they won with this precise car, with lap time of 1:09! which is the current lap record for street cars, how is that?
May 21, 2004 7:10:07 AM
Quote:
CF said:
Quote:
And I'm sorry but when it comes to performance, Techart is one of the best tunners for Porsche, ever heard of the Tuner Grand Prix at Hockenheim? well, Techart usually dominates. And as a matter of fact last year they won with this precise car, with lap time of 1:09! which is the current lap record for street cars, how is that?
The Techart car used to set that time had absolutely nothing to do with the product they sell to customers.
It was specially set up for this race and with substantially more HP than they say.
It had R tires as well.
Racing suspension.
Same goes for the Gemballa that did 7.32 on the Ring.
Racing suspension
R tires
870 HP !!!!!!!
Absolutely nothing in common with the cars they sell except the look maybe.
Pure marketing nothing else.
May 21, 2004 10:32:16 AM
Quote:
CF said:
The Techart car used to set that time had absolutely nothing to do with the product they sell to customers.
It was specially set up for this race and with substantially more HP than they say.
It had R tires as well.
Racing suspension.
Same goes for the Gemballa that did 7.32 on the Ring.
Racing suspension
R tires
870 HP !!!!!!!
Absolutely nothing in common with the cars they sell except the look maybe.
Pure marketing nothing else.
May 21, 2004 9:42:56 PM