Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
VGA18 said:
A quote from LPower. Numbers are very impressive.
That's fast! Enzo and CGT territory!
Murciélago is the last dinosaur out there, great that someone still builds such cars!
Quote:
mv said:
The 599 really wins hands down in terms of braking. The LP640 needed almost 40 metres from 100-0.
Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
Quote:
KresoF1 said:
Markus,
I am more interested in difference between 160km/h till say 250km/h... Why? 0-100km/h do not mean nothing for this cars IMHO-you need to use LC with both to achive the best possible time. And you simply will not use LC everyday on the autobahn...
Just my opinion...
Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Quote:
VGA18 said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Marcus i am not sure but that car may be the same car which auto zeitung tested.(their test result was worse than factory claims)
I think italian guys know this car how to launch than the others
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Besides, one Audi is probably enough for you .
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
VGA18 said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Marcus i am not sure but that car may be the same car which auto zeitung tested.(their test result was worse than factory claims)
I think italian guys know this car how to launch than the others
That might be an explanation
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
The problem with owning and driving a LP640 in Germany is that your social environment will perceive you with an entirely new perspective
Worse than a Ferrari?
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Besides, one Audi is probably enough for you .
That might be true
However, I really liked the Gallardo when I test drove it last fall. Very intense character. Unlike Porsche, unlike Ferrari, a very special car!
If they offered the LP640 with ESP I would at least test drive it! The problem with owning and driving a LP640 in Germany is that your social environment will perceive you with an entirely new perspective
Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Besides, one Audi is probably enough for you .
That might be true
However, I really liked the Gallardo when I test drove it last fall. Very intense character. Unlike Porsche, unlike Ferrari, a very special car!
If they offered the LP640 with ESP I would at least test drive it! The problem with owning and driving a LP640 in Germany is that your social environment will perceive you with an entirely new perspective
Quote:
J.Seven said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:Quote:
Rossi said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
However, differences are very marginal. Both cars a similarly quick.
And yet sooo different!
Think back of the times when the Testarossa battled against the Countach/Diablo and take a look at the situation nowadays, where we have the Murciélago as a direct descendant of the midengined V12-Lamborghini competing against a luxury and comfortable GT-like car as the 599 GTB Fiorano, which offers approximately the same performance as its race-bred competitor from Sant' Agata Bolognese.
That's true. The two cars have very different personalities.
From my personal perspective the LP640 has two major flaws (otherwise I like the car very much, I guess): lack of ESP and lack of understatement. A possible third disadvantage might be the apparent quality fluctuations in the production process (remember several magazine tests where the LP640 missed factory claimed performance figures by quite a wide margin...).
Besides, one Audi is probably enough for you .
That might be true
However, I really liked the Gallardo when I test drove it last fall. Very intense character. Unlike Porsche, unlike Ferrari, a very special car!
If they offered the LP640 with ESP I would at least test drive it! The problem with owning and driving a LP640 in Germany is that your social environment will perceive you with an entirely new perspective
Are you saying Murci is seen as a pimp car?
Speaking with some German friends, that's the idea I got.
J.Seven
Quote:
andrea said:
spy-info said that Murci has different exhaust from the AMS test,you can see the difference at 130km/h,now 81db(ex 79) and max db 105.5
The 0-200km/h is a lot faster than in AMS site.
This Lambo has 690hp
Quote:
andrea said:
spy-info said that Murci has different exhaust from the AMS test,you can see the difference at 130km/h,now 81db(ex 79) and max db 105.5
The 0-200km/h is a lot faster than in AMS site.
This Lambo has 690hp
Quote:
andrea said:
spy-info said that Murci has different exhaust from the AMS test,you can see the difference at 130km/h,now 81db(ex 79) and max db 105.5
The 0-200km/h is a lot faster than in AMS site.
This Lambo has 690hp