Crown

Board: Porsche - 911 - 997 Language: English Region: Worldwide Share/Save/Bookmark Close

Forum - Thread


    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    Quote:
    jcs said:

    Instead of continuing to complain about how bad the Nav system is,
    why don't you just change the map display preference setting ?




    Got no time! I'm in traffic. I'm late. I take an alternate route because of construction. Not my job to software engineer nav to help driver out in situations like this.

    Yeah, nav works perfectly when reality is ideal. When road or route conditions change you're f'ed up.

    IOW, even with to-the-inch GPS the nav abandons you when the going gets tough.

    Yeah, I should have pulled over and scrambled thru the manual and "reprogrammed" the little f**ker. Not my idea of driving amid the "excellence" of a GT car though.


    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    I think you are reacting to your situation more than the NAV.

    Other than lacking a touch screen and voice activation, I have no major issues with it...

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    It would be nice if we could position the on-screen arrow (car) closer to the bottom of the screen showing more of where you're going as opposed to 50/50. You would have seen more with more detail but the screen would still rotate.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    I lke the NAV system also. I actually got to go to a comparison focus group on NAVs and actually prefer the Porsche system. The rotation is suppose to happen, it is a NAV system and not a paper map. All NAV systems I have used rotate. Minor streets will disappear when zooming out, all NAV systems do this. Even with Google maps, they do this and they have far more display resolution than the PCM screen. My bet is that your VCR is blinking still.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    Please guys, I don't want to make enemies and influence foes here.

    I'm just reporting how my nav system let me down in the midst of my rather important schedule.

    I promose to study the manual (again!) to get some of the finer points.

    The fact that it drops out streets when you zoom out a bit is really bad feature. Not only does it seem unnecessary (there's lot's of room on screen and not too many streets in the area where I was), but THAT really messes things up especially when it's not in "north up" mode.

    I still love the car (and am grateful to the thoughtful suggestions of you guys here) but I was just plain pi**ed I or "it" screwed up and I was embarassingly late... .

    Thanks for your forbearance too.




    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    Quote:
    vtrader said:
    I lke the NAV system also. I actually got to go to a comparison focus group on NAVs and actually prefer the Porsche system. The rotation is suppose to happen, it is a NAV system and not a paper map. All NAV systems I have used rotate. Minor streets will disappear when zooming out, all NAV systems do this. Even with Google maps, they do this and they have far more display resolution than the PCM screen. My bet is that your VCR is blinking still.



    I was at the same focus group.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    I loved the NAV in Europe. I picked up the car in Germany and drove it around for 3 weeks. The NAV paid for itself just on that trip alone. Now, I will have to see how the Software is for the USA. I have heard that it is better in Europe. Like I said, it was soooo useful in Europe for three weeks, that I now consider it just a novelty.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    While I don't have your problems, I do find it to be inaccurate. It's taken the long way round more than a few times, including making turn round an entire block when i could've taken the first right.
    I agree with Alex though, the multifunction steering is good for many things even if it is a little busy looking.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    I am pretty Nav literate, but this system is lacking allot. It's a Porsche so that helps me cope with the lack of functionality. I use it mainly to know where gas stations are and I have them as an icon on the map at all times. The nav is good to find gas stations, banks and addresses. If you want to find a business by name it can't (or I have not figured it out yet). Zooming in and out with the right hand button works alright to see upcoming streets, but nothing beats a touch screen where you can scroll across the whole map. My first nav system was in a Honda Accord and no other system I have used can compare, but then again it was no Pcar

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    P.S. I will take the ability to drop the top at 42mph over a user freindly GPS any day

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    Quote:
    rhino said:
    P.S. I will take the ability to drop the top at 42mph over a user freindly GPS any day



    30 mph

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    Mine does it @ 42

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    I think it may initiate the windows or rear cover movement but if your top is lifting off at that speed then get it checked out!

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    If you are above 42mph it stops operating, @ what mph does yours stop?

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    Quote:
    rhino said:
    If you are above 42mph it stops operating, @ what mph does yours stop?



    31 like book says. (50kph)

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech manuals

    Yeah I had read the manual but I thought they were just under rating it. I will have it checked out at the dealer, but it is still very stable at 42.

    Re: Dont buy Nav unless life is perfect or you love tech man

    Quote:
    MMD said:
    Quote:
    jcs said:

    Instead of continuing to complain about how bad the Nav system is,
    why don't you just change the map display preference setting ?




    Got no time! I'm in traffic. I'm late. I take an alternate route because of construction. Not my job to software engineer nav to help driver out in situations like this.

    Yeah, nav works perfectly when reality is ideal. When road or route conditions change you're f'ed up.

    IOW, even with to-the-inch GPS the nav abandons you when the going gets tough.

    Yeah, I should have pulled over and scrambled thru the manual and "reprogrammed" the little f**ker. Not my idea of driving amid the "excellence" of a GT car though.






    Anything that would be simple enough for you to understand the VERY FIRST time you use it while in a major rush probably wouldn't have enough information to be useful afterwards. Like you said - then just buy a map. Fact is I've never opened the NAV part of my manual but use the map part at least 2-3 times every week for the last year plus and it works great and I'm usually a big map guy (when I'm traveling) The problem w/ maps is you really need more than one for any location because you want one large enough to see the major routes from state to state and then at least one more for street to street driving. That's the beauty of the NAV map you have like 10 map sizes in one.

    Don't let the machine get the better of you. I bet if you gave it a shot locking the rotation like someone susggested (which really doesn't bother me but I get it ) and especially without being in such a rush. I doubt there's anyone here that would be able to jump in a 997 for the very first time and pick up on the workings of the NAV while in a major rush to a meeting and trying to figure it out at the same time first time out. What do you guys think? I couldn't have. It's probably also dangerous. I mean even 5 or 10 mintues playing with the system before getting in and trying it on a drive would be a big help imho.

    Nav is very poor design

    It was designed by engineers rather than ergonomicists. It's not intuitive - in other words you have to read the manual and learn how to use it. In today's world that is poor design and a very old-fashioned way of approaching a user interface and in this case a driver's AID. In the ergonomic loser awards it runs iDrive a very close second.

    Porsche should hand the job over to Apple and get someone to design the thing properly. In the meantime might I suggest Mapquest or Rand-McNally?

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    I for one don't find the Porsche Nav unreasonably complex or difficult to use. I now have four; they are all different; they all have strengths and weaknesses; 3 of the 4 are useful tools (the MB one really stinks).

    While having the map always show North-up may seem like the completely obvious default to some people (like me), others who have no sense of direction and really need the Nav to find their way may feel that they are always going forward and want the map oriented that way.

    The zoom control on the P is much more intuitive than the others I have (what could beat just twisting a dial?).

    Programming destinations is always a toss between a touch screen (gets really greasy from fingerprints) and some sort of cursor control; I find the P system quick and easy to use. I personally prefer touchpads, but that's just me.

    I've spend almost no time looking at the manual. Well, actually, I looked through the manual in the living room, but not while I was in the car. My retention of the specific use of the various commands from the reading is pretty limited. I did get that the "Set" button is important and I should probably see what it does.

    I agree with Stradale: any mapping system which had no complexity would probably be too simple to solve any real-world problems.

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    Scotty A said:
    Programming destinations is always a toss between a touch screen (gets really greasy from fingerprints)



    And, over time the coating on touch screens can come off. Had on display on my Landcruiser (touch screen) replaced because of this.

    Would be nice to see a "tilt" feature on the screen so that you could adjust the viewing angle, similar to the way you adjust your rearview mirror. Otherwise, I find the Porsche Nav just fine. Think Acura has the "real time" traffic re-route option? (Small monthly fee)

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    Scotty A said:


    I agree with Stradale: any mapping system which had no complexity would probably be too simple to solve any real-world problems.



    I *respectfully* disagree. It's like if Porsche spent more money and time finding the right outsourced software outfit to do the software for the nav (maybe include touch screen soft buttons) the thing could be muuuuuuuch better; exemplary as a matter of fact. The fact that PCM DOMINATES the interior of the car and is not-optional in the Carrera should be even more incentive for Porsche to make it the BEST (most flexible, intuitive, forgiving,) in the business.

    Look at cell phones. They do a sheet-load of stuff but most people can pick one up and just use it, even use the directory function without thinking.

    Our current nav is has a "punnishing" attitude. IF you push the wrong button or don't read and follow the manual you're forced back a few steps leaving you bewildered.

    I don't mean to bittch and complain, I'm used to following "strict" exacting procedures every day in my job, but when I get into the car I just want simple-a**ed things like nav syatems to get the heck out of my way and direct me thru the trouble I might be having (like getting lost)... .

    Sorry, again, don't want to sound like a PITA, I just want more from Porsche. Really, again, sorry for the cr*ppy mood.


    Re: Nav is very poor design

    i feel your pain :-)

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    Scotty A said:
    I for one don't find the Porsche Nav unreasonably complex or difficult to use...any mapping system which had no complexity would probably be too simple to solve any real-world problems.



    On the first point, why can't it be better than it is? You're accepting it because you bought it and now post-rationalise why it works for you. Second re the complexity this is nonsense! Any complex system should be capable of being simplified so it is more usable. If a company can't do this then they are incompetent - they don't understand what people want to do with it. An iPod is complex in terms of content, but extracting that content is simple. Look at a Blackberry which is in theory complex but in reality very simple to use.

    Net, net you may be able to use it but that doesn't negate the fact that the NAV system in the 997 is of very poor design.

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Ah ... of course it can be better. I hope that the next rev is better so that later buyers can benefit from the free analysis and feedback that many of us are providing to Porsche. I'm accepting it because, having used three other systems already, I happen to find it pretty good. As I said, I would opt for a touchscreen system myself, but I'm pretty impressed with the interface that Porsche has developed. I really don't think I'm rationalizing.

    I feel pretty free about pointing out shortcomings:

    I think the lack of iPod or even an Aux input is appallingly stupid;
    I think the lack of Bluetooth so I can use my own phone is cheesy;
    I think the lack of a spare tire is cheap, and could clearly be engineered into the trunk (it fit in the 986!);
    I think the fact that the mp3 player only picks up 160 tracks and has a 'random' feature that I could have outprogrammed in 1973 is amaturish;
    Etc. etc. etc.

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    My 12 year old had no problem with it without ever looking at the manual.
    I'm not implying that it could not be easier,but
    some people just seem to have a problem accepting the fact that perhaps they are" technically challenged "

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    One flaw I did find in their execution of the nav function. They require the Longitude to be entered before the Latitude. Any self respecting navigator and pilot knows that the latitude figure is always given first.

    It's little things like that, but not the overall system, that might wear on you. In general it saves me a bunch of time.

    Dan

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    jcs said:
    some people just seem to have a problem accepting the fact that perhaps they are" technically challenged "



    I doubt MMD is technically challenged. I just think he's ranting because he was 15 min. late for his foot massage!

    IOW, reflexology for gas & brake but no clutch.

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    MMD said:
    I don't mean to bittch and complain, I'm used to following "strict" exacting procedures every day in my job, but when I get into the car I just want simple-a**ed things like nav syatems to get the heck out of my way and direct me thru the trouble I might be having (like getting lost)... .




    I gotta ask ...was this your first experience/outing with the Nav system??
    Sounds like you have had the car and not used it... then had a frustrating experience on your first try when you needed it.

    Trust the NAV..it works
    Go off the indicated path it recalculates to keep you going to your destination...no problem

    Loosen your tie a bit


    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    GA997S said:
    Quote:
    jcs said:
    some people just seem to have a problem accepting the fact that perhaps they are" technically challenged "



    I doubt MMD is technically challenged. I just think he's ranting because he was 15 min. late for his foot massage!

    IOW, reflexology for gas & brake but no clutch.



    And then some people complain about the clutch in the CGT. Just no pleasing everyone.

    Re: Nav is very poor design

    Quote:
    Le Chef said:
    Quote:
    Scotty A said:
    I for one don't find the Porsche Nav unreasonably complex or difficult to use...any mapping system which had no complexity would probably be too simple to solve any real-world problems.



    On the first point, why can't it be better than it is? You're accepting it because you bought it and now post-rationalise why it works for you. Second re the complexity this is nonsense! Any complex system should be capable of being simplified so it is more usable. If a company can't do this then they are incompetent - they don't understand what people want to do with it. An iPod is complex in terms of content, but extracting that content is simple. Look at a Blackberry which is in theory complex but in reality very simple to use.

    Net, net you may be able to use it but that doesn't negate the fact that the NAV system in the 997 is of very poor design.




    Find a person that's never used a blackberry or the Porsche NAV. Tell them to get in the car and drive and while driving figure out how to use each.

    I disagree, I think the Porsche NAV design is excellent. Honestly wouldn't change a single thing about it. Good job Porsche!

     
    Edit

    Forum

    Board Subject Last post Rating Views Replies
    Porsche Sticky SUN'S LAST RUN TO WILSON, WY - 991 C2S CAB LIFE, END OF AN ERA (Part II) 4/17/24 7:16 AM
    GnilM
    778866 1798
    Porsche Sticky Welcome to Rennteam: Cars and Coffee... (photos) 4/7/24 11:48 AM
    Boxster Coupe GTS
    442183 565
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Cayman GT4 RS (2021) 5/12/23 12:11 PM
    W8MM
    263054 288
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS - 2022 3/12/24 8:28 AM
    DJM48
    261335 323
    Porsche Sticky The new Macan: the first all-electric SUV from Porsche 1/30/24 9:18 AM
    RCA
    85567 45
    Porsche Sticky OFFICIAL: Taycan 2024 Facelift 3/15/24 1:23 PM
    CGX car nut
    5777 50
    Porsche The moment I've been waiting for... 2/1/24 7:01 PM
    Pilot
     
     
     
     
     
    881021 1364
    Porsche 992 GT3 7/23/23 7:01 PM
    Grant
    817188 3868
    Porsche Welcome to the new Taycan Forum! 2/10/24 4:43 PM
    nberry
    391381 1526
    Porsche GT4RS 4/21/24 11:50 AM
    mcdelaug
    390886 1454
    Others Tesla 2 the new thread 12/13/23 2:48 PM
    CGX car nut
    373163 2401
    Porsche Donor vehicle for Singer Vehicle Design 7/3/23 12:30 PM
    Porker
    369184 797
    Porsche Red Nipples 991.2 GT3 Touring on tour 4/11/24 12:32 PM
    Ferdie
    289522 668
    Porsche Collected my 997 GTS today 10/19/23 7:06 PM
    CGX car nut
     
     
     
     
     
    261583 812
    Lambo Huracán EVO STO 7/30/23 6:59 PM
    mcdelaug
    240445 346
    Lotus Lotus Emira 6/25/23 2:53 PM
    Enmanuel
    230865 101
    Others Corvette C8 10/16/23 3:24 PM
    Enmanuel
    221395 488
    Others Gordon Murray - T.50 11/22/23 10:27 AM
    mcdelaug
    169568 387
    Porsche Back to basics - 996 GT3 RS 6/11/23 5:13 PM
    CGX car nut
    141313 144
    BMW M 2024 BMW M3 CS Official Now 12/29/23 9:04 AM
    RCA
    117832 303
    Motor Sp. 2023 Formula One 12/19/23 5:38 AM
    WhoopsyM
    108844 685
    Porsche 2022 992 Safari Model 3/7/24 4:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    84370 239
    AMG Mercedes-Benz W124 500E aka Porsche typ 2758 2/23/24 10:03 PM
    blueflame
    75226 297
    Porsche 992 GT3 RS 3/3/24 7:22 PM
    WhoopsyM
    53925 314
    Motor Sp. Porsche 963 3/16/24 9:27 PM
    WhoopsyM
    25262 237
    Ferrari Ferrari 296 GTB (830PS, Hybrid V6) 1/21/24 4:29 PM
    GT-Boy
    21190 103
    BMW M 2022 BMW M5 CS 4/8/24 1:43 PM
    Ferdie
    19539 140
    AMG G63 sold out 9/15/23 7:38 PM
    Nico997
    16602 120
    AMG [2022] Mercedes-AMG SL 4/23/24 1:24 PM
    RCA
    13846 225
    Motor Sp. 24-Hour race Nürburgring 2018 5/25/23 10:42 PM
    Grant
    11272 55
    126 items found, displaying 1 to 30.