Jun 25, 2006 10:27:28 PM
Quote:you left out the turbo s rumor!
RC said:
997 GT2, MY 2008, aprox. 520 HP, aprox. 320 kph top speed, aprox. 50 kg less weight compared to 997 Turbo. Just a more "solid" rumor.
997 Turbo Powerkit, aprox. 510 HP, no overboost, 317 kph top speed.
BOTH are rumors!!!
Quote:
MKSGR said:
German AutoBild says that the new GT2 will be launched in spring ... 2008 !?!?!?!?!?
Hope that they are wrong again We need that car in 2007
Quote:
AMA said:
Any word on release date ? I still have some time to upgrade my order from turbo to GT2
Few questions:
- Does the GT2 lose the Navi screen ?
- Sunroof Optional ? I prefer hardtop
- Sport Chrono ? anyway to delete the 1948 analog clock ?
- VTG Technology with bigger turbos ?
Quote:
Crash said:Quote:
MKSGR said:
German AutoBild says that the new GT2 will be launched in spring ... 2008 !?!?!?!?!?
Hope that they are wrong again We need that car in 2007
By then, Audi could launch a 520 horsepower R8. Or maybe even the twin-turbo version with 600 horsepower. Not to mention the 550 horsepower Gallardo. You shouldn't burden yourself so much with such trivialities. What difference does it make to you whether it's a Porsche, an Audi or a Lambo? Goes fast, eats gas, makes you happy .
Jul 9, 2006 3:32:35 PM
Jul 10, 2006 2:15:15 AM
Quote:
nh13 said:
2.8 seconds to 60, 520 hp OMg!!!!! This car is goin to be a beast
Jul 11, 2006 12:37:20 PM
Quote:
crazi4speed said:Quote:
nh13 said:
2.8 seconds to 60, 520 hp OMg!!!!! This car is goin to be a beast
that is crap...CGT has 600+ hp, would be lighter and would take 1 secs more to 60??
and if it has 40-50 more hp than the Turbo + 100 lb lighter, it only amounts to may be a saving of .2-.3 secs in the 0-60 so a time between 3.4(trip) - 3.7(manual)
but no doubt it is going to one beast..too bad it wouldnt be very exotic looking, but damn man...one hell of a car to own..
Jul 11, 2006 2:32:48 PM
Quote:
devo said:Quote:
crazi4speed said:Quote:
nh13 said:
2.8 seconds to 60, 520 hp OMg!!!!! This car is goin to be a beast
that is crap...CGT has 600+ hp, would be lighter and would take 1 secs more to 60??
and if it has 40-50 more hp than the Turbo + 100 lb lighter, it only amounts to may be a saving of .2-.3 secs in the 0-60 so a time between 3.4(trip) - 3.7(manual)
but no doubt it is going to one beast..too bad it wouldnt be very exotic looking, but damn man...one hell of a car to own..
0-60 times are such a poor indicator of acceleration imo. 0-100, 20-100 and beyond, are much more indicative of a vehicle's capabilities.
Jul 11, 2006 2:33:53 PM
Quote:
crazi4speed said:Quote:
devo said:Quote:
crazi4speed said:Quote:
nh13 said:
2.8 seconds to 60, 520 hp OMg!!!!! This car is goin to be a beast
that is crap...CGT has 600+ hp, would be lighter and would take 1 secs more to 60??
and if it has 40-50 more hp than the Turbo + 100 lb lighter, it only amounts to may be a saving of .2-.3 secs in the 0-60 so a time between 3.4(trip) - 3.7(manual)
but no doubt it is going to one beast..too bad it wouldnt be very exotic looking, but damn man...one hell of a car to own..
0-60 times are such a poor indicator of acceleration imo. 0-100, 20-100 and beyond, are much more indicative of a vehicle's capabilities.
I absolutely agree and thats what I had said in my past posts if you happen to fall upon them, but then again, just pure science is also something and we are talking about 0-60 times in this GT2 vs CGT and looking at the numbers it makes no sense that it would be able to out accelerate the CGT from 0-60 as well..in CGT the car could do 3.5ish i beleive..
Quote:
MKSGR said:
German AutoBild says that the new GT2 will be launched in spring ... 2008 !?!?!?!?!?
Hope that they are wrong again We need that car in 2007