May 29, 2006 11:52:35 AM
Quote:
pedro_b said:
http://www.worldcarfans.com/news.cfm/cou...gt3-rs-revealed
as some info and pretty good pics on it!
same power but closer gearbox and lighter flywell,ie, freer revving!)
Quote:
pierre said:
So the price increase is justified by:
- 20kg less
- wide-body
- bucket seats (seem to be included, right?)
Is that it? For EUR 18k (without taxes)?
Quote:
SciFrog said:
I don't get it, they better have some nice lap time difference to justify the price...
Quote:
frayed said:Do the above differences (if that is all there is) merit the RS badge?
Quote:
Grant said:Quote:
frayed said:Do the above differences (if that is all there is) merit the RS badge?
No. Let's hope there's more that we don't know yet. To be honest, the 996GT3RS was a pretty modest improvement over the GT3 MkII also and sort of marginally deserved that moniker too. IMHO, RS should mean significantly less weight and significantly more power.
Quote:
Joost said:
yeah, but the way they did it now, they were able to combine standard components (C4 body, GT3 suspension) and a couple of new parts (wing, rearlid) to a new model... I think it would have cost a lot more to have too many model-unique parts, like a CF body.
-Joost-
Quote:
Grant said:Quote:
frayed said:Do the above differences (if that is all there is) merit the RS badge?
No. Let's hope there's more that we don't know yet. To be honest, the 996GT3RS was a pretty modest improvement over the GT3 MkII also and sort of marginally deserved that moniker too. IMHO, RS should mean significantly less weight and significantly more power.