New 997 GT3 RS pics
Apr 13, 2006 12:30:57 AM
Apr 13, 2006 2:25:58 AM
Quote:
U Boat Commander said:
I don't understand why if the CGT can have a retractable wing, they cannot put one on the GT2 and GT3. I love both cars, but the wing is just a deal killer for me. I really can't be driving around town in a car with a ricer wing on the back.
Quote:
Yargk said:Quote:
U Boat Commander said:
I don't understand why if the CGT can have a retractable wing, they cannot put one on the GT2 and GT3. I love both cars, but the wing is just a deal killer for me. I really can't be driving around town in a car with a ricer wing on the back.
The CGT wing shouldn't have been retractable. Retractable = for looks only.
Apr 13, 2006 6:22:49 AM
Quote:
U Boat Commander said:
I love both cars, but the wing is just a deal killer for me. I really can't be driving around town in a car with a ricer wing on the back.
Quote:
Moogle said:Quote:
Yargk said:Quote:
U Boat Commander said:
I don't understand why if the CGT can have a retractable wing, they cannot put one on the GT2 and GT3. I love both cars, but the wing is just a deal killer for me. I really can't be driving around town in a car with a ricer wing on the back.
The CGT wing shouldn't have been retractable. Retractable = for looks only.
the idea of a retractable wing is that the car will have a better sillouette at low speed when the wing isnt needed.
in no way does this imply that the wing is non-functional or performance oriented or just-for-show.