Crown
Board: Ferrari
Language: English
Region: Worldwide
Close
CloseForum - Thread
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
Quote:
iia said:Quote:
Hurst said:Quote:
Lazy Cat said:
The gallardo is not launched properly. The driver should have put the engine to the rev limiter and then let the clutch go.Fastest way to launch a 4wd car.Also called the "audi quattro" way.
Can you explain why (for my enlightenment)?
As little wheels spin is needed for a quick launch to break the initial stationary traction, it means high rev launch for a 4WD car.
And the car will be trash material after a few months of such launches. Redlining the engine and releasing the clutch is for ricer kids and magazine testers, not enthusiasts who don't want to destroy their car in the first month of ownership. Even the new Lancer EVO (remarkable little machine, great for fast inner-city hopping) is limited to 5000 rpm from a standstill. Want to guess why?
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
Quote:
Crash said :
And the car will be trash material after a few months of such launches. Redlining the engine and releasing the clutch is for ricer kids and magazine testers, not enthusiasts who don't want to destroy their car in the first month of ownership. Even the new Lancer EVO (remarkable little machine, great for fast inner-city hopping) is limited to 5000 rpm from a standstill. Want to guess why?
Yes i agree, but the fastest way is the way i described.
Don't forget that when lambo announces a 0-62 in 3.4 sec for the murcielago lp 640, they start the car the way i explained.
Here is an exemple with a Murcielago ===> http://rapidshare.de/files/14500211/murcie.mpg.html
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
Quote:
Lazy Cat said:Quote:
Crash said :
And the car will be trash material after a few months of such launches. Redlining the engine and releasing the clutch is for ricer kids and magazine testers, not enthusiasts who don't want to destroy their car in the first month of ownership. Even the new Lancer EVO (remarkable little machine, great for fast inner-city hopping) is limited to 5000 rpm from a standstill. Want to guess why?
Yes i agree, but the fastest way is the way i described.
Don't forget that when lambo announces a 0-62 in 3.4 sec for the murcielago lp 640, they start the car the way i explained.
Here is an exemple with a Murcielago ===> http://rapidshare.de/files/14500211/murcie.mpg.html
Of course. I wouldn't do it, though. That's why Porsche's times (save for the CGT) are the most reliable. Basically anyone with some skill can achieve them, without abusing the car.
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
That G picture was also in video format believe me guys that guy is so comfortable and the car is stable during at 190+ mph's.
Here is a video about G going about 190mph.
Look how he is stable. Check the edge of screen how he is going
So with the help of these pictures how much G can go more. Notice!! max hp rpm is 7800. it still has 400rpm to go
Here is a video about G going about 190mph.
Look how he is stable. Check the edge of screen how he is going
So with the help of these pictures how much G can go more. Notice!! max hp rpm is 7800. it still has 400rpm to go
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
SO there is confusion ??? 
or this g tuned??? or the shorter gear change eats top speed? I dont know maybe expeirence peeps will tell us
hmmmm i didnt notice any remark about the video if the G is tuned. Only Gallardo 190mph and also for the picture Gallardo 200 mph titles are put when i found this pic and video.
or this g tuned??? or the shorter gear change eats top speed? I dont know maybe expeirence peeps will tell us
hmmmm i didnt notice any remark about the video if the G is tuned. Only Gallardo 190mph and also for the picture Gallardo 200 mph titles are put when i found this pic and video.
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
I see so another speedo error issue such as new M5, or old 996 porsches
So if new one see 340-316 then old one 332-333 to 309 right
Cauz i calculated the top speed can reach with this situation( Dont ask me how i calculated? I get gear ratios- mph/1000rpm and max speed and gear at rpm from car%driver mag)) convert it to last gear and from the picture. my measurement is about 335kmh at 7800 rpm.
So if new one see 340-316 then old one 332-333 to 309 right
Cauz i calculated the top speed can reach with this situation( Dont ask me how i calculated? I get gear ratios- mph/1000rpm and max speed and gear at rpm from car%driver mag)) convert it to last gear and from the picture. my measurement is about 335kmh at 7800 rpm.
Re: Gallardo Vs 430
Quote:
VGA18 said:
I see so another speedo error issue such as new M5, or old 996 porsches
So if new one see 340-316 then old one 332-333 to 309 right
Cauz i calculated the top speed can reach with this situation( Dont ask me how i calculated? I get gear ratios- mph/1000rpm and max speed and gear at rpm from car%driver mag)) convert it to last gear and from the picture. my measurement is about 335kmh at 7800 rpm.
The italian maganzine "Automobilismo" tested the Gallardo 2 years ago and they got 309 km/h real speed at an indicated 331 km/h. That's a pretty big error, if you ask me.
Forum
About Rennteam | Help | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Support | Contact | Imprint | Archive
Powered by
Community
and
