Oct 1, 2010 11:57:02 AM
Oct 1, 2010 12:33:22 PM
Oct 1, 2010 12:44:58 PM
Actually, IMO Audi's sports car racing involvement has been saturated after so many successes in both Europe and USA, so I expect the next move to be F1 against Mercedes and the rest.
This will leave the door open for Porsche to return to its natural home.
"Form follows function"
Oct 1, 2010 12:45:06 PM
Spyderidol:
I personally don't want this to happen. Porsche is so much more than just an engine supplier.
Unfortunately, and as I predicted, the tie in with VW is complicating Porsche's return to it's natural home: Sports Car Racing!
"He made it clear that he expected either Porsche or Audi to have an LMP1 car in the future - while the other brand would then enter F1."
I guess that the writing is on the wall. As a marketing exercise, it has huge implications on the brand's image.
But it's still probably too early to add a link to Easy's F1 thread...
Slow In, Fast Out
Oct 1, 2010 11:03:39 PM
Well the VW overtaking is good for something then. But just an engine supplier would be rather boring.. Porsche should go to the hardcore racing series that will bring some design elements to their cars. F1 is too much out there.
indeed shifting is ancient technology - so is a fuel burning engine.. I happen to like both :)
Oct 1, 2010 11:17:29 PM
Atzporsche:Well the VW overtaking is good for something then. But just an engine supplier would be rather boring.. Porsche should go to the hardcore racing series that will bring some design elements to their cars. F1 is too much out there.
Oct 9, 2010 9:09:34 AM
This is looking like it is more and more probable.
I would like to see a LMP1 car winning LM and elsewhere.
F1 is very tricky as a marketing tool. See how many manufacturers have gone in and out of F1 with their hands (and pockets) empty. If I were Porsche I would supply engines and utilise any success and keep out of any potential failure.
Supplying engines in F1 counts for a lot. TAG-Porsche, Honda, Ford, Mercedes and Renault all had their share in the success of F1 teams and gained prestige with little risk.
"Form follows function"
Oct 9, 2010 10:51:33 AM
The more competitions they particpate in the better, and F1 is a great showcase for them, but the only thing I would ask Porsche is that if they decide to compete as a team, its because they know they can be a top team, and not to bother if they are going to be competing against the Hispanias, Virgins, etc...
--
Oct 9, 2010 10:54:33 AM
Oct 9, 2010 11:06:06 AM
Eunice:
I assume if Porsche is entering F1, it's going to be to become a top team, and with a budget to achieve that. A half assed F1 effort will only hurt the brand.
Exactly, but the problem is that F1 is very tricky, having a big budget does not necesarily guarantee results in F1, just look at Toyota in recent years and their huge budget(I believe it was the biggest), or Honda-BAR. They need to have great "F1" engineers, test drivers, managers, etc in the pay roll as well as one top driver at least on the seat. Unless they know they have all that tied down, they better not bother because F1 is not like other motorsport competitions, they can't start from scratch and use their know-how from other competitions and apply it to F1 and think they can be competitive. Then there is the "circus" part of F1 and all its bull$hit too.
I guess the best way to start is to buy a current mid-level team from the grid, sign-in a few key top guys in F1 and launch from there. And personally I think they would need a lot of luck to be able to do that besides the huge amounts of money
--
Oct 9, 2010 11:12:15 AM
Only Mercedes in recent years got a lot out of F1 and that was in large part to the tie-up with McLaren a long established team. Team-Renault was a flash in the pan, already
Think of the failures amongst manufacturers: Peugeot,Toyota, Honda, Jaguar, BMW and others I don't remember now.
OTOH, you make a good LMP1 car, choose a period with little competition win LM and a few other long distance classics for a few times and the publicity will last you very long. The outlay? A fraction of F1.
--
"Form follows function"
Oct 9, 2010 11:13:01 AM
There are many reasons why I think this is a bad idea.
Oct 9, 2010 11:28:41 AM
Your points are all valid, but I think they do not outweigh the possibilities a F1 participation has to offer.
LMP1 is in no ways comparable to the publicity of a F1 participation. Of course, entering the F1 will have to be an all out effort. And Audi and Porsche are not allowed to compete.
F1 works very well for Ferrari, they do transfer technology to their road cars and it's very good for the brand.
The real question is, will Porsche be like Ferrari in F1? I think they can be.
Eunice:
F1 works very well for Ferrari, they do transfer technology to their road cars and it's very good for the brand.
What technologies? A large amount of technology is bought in from outside suppliers/sub-contractors not only for Ferrari but for other teams and in other areas of motorsport too.
Lamborghini have never raced extensively, if at all, never won anything and yet their cars are technologically as good as Ferrari, and for some even better.
The benefit of motorsport is the publicity and the customer loyalty that this creates. Important things of course but the trick is to gain this prestige in the most economical way.
--
"Form follows function"
a few small corrections -
Lamborghini did try F1 with the Larousse-lamborghini effort of the early 90's. It was a flop.
BMW did get notoriety out of their effort, especially going back to the 80's when they powered the Brabham BMW of Piquet and later the bennettons. Most powerful turbo's ever in F1. 1300+ hp from a 1.5 liter 4 cyl engine. M POWER
I too think it should start out as an engine supplier only with contingent plans for a full team if the engine succeeds. The Porsche TAG turbo was the most dominant engine in F1.
Is F1 going back to turbo's?
Engine supplier benefits, examples:
TAG turbo engine in dominant McLaren between 1984-1986 (5 titles) and Porsche get a large share of the publicity and prestige that is still exploited to this day.
Porsche V12 3.5 engine powering Footwork Arrows in 1991, was a disaster that lasted only for a few races and was dropped. No one remembers this Porsche fiasco. Had it been a Porsche factory team the stigma would linger on and the cost of failure, monetary and otherwise, would have been enormous.
--
"Form follows function"
racerx:
They were also doing an indy car engine around that time which was showing potential but it was canceled due to budget. The early 90's were a very troubled time for Porsche. Money was very tight, so I do not know if the quitting then was technical or financial.
Here is an article about the V12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_3512
"Form follows function"
AL UNSER NAMED TO DRIVE QUAKER STATE PORSCHE INDY CAR
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J., June 25 /PRNewswire/ -- Al Unser, the winner of this year's Indianapolis 500 race has been named by Porsche Motorsport North America and Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation as the driver of the new Quaker State Porsche Indy Car which will be unveiled in September.
In making the announcement, Al Holbert, Director, Porsche Motorsport North America, stated, "The objective of the program this year is to test the new Quaker State Porsche in a racing environment. This requires a driver who knows how to race and win while still conserving the car. Al Unser fits the bill perfectly." …
1989 Derrick Walker "Quaker State" March/Porsche. Teo Fabi. Winner, CART at Mid Ohio. IIRC, only win for Porsche in any Indycar series, regardless of sanctioning body.